Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's plagiarism, by definition. If you're going to quote someone else's writings (however absurd they are), you gotta give a link, or at least credit.
He didn't write it.
No surprise you like it so much, you're a PROVEN PLAGIARIST too:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/782439-post11.html
Birds of a feather, eh Chrissy
if you post something that isnt your own words, you should post a link to your source
Who cares if he didnt write it, what the hell does it matter, it creates a point and you cant deal with it so you spin it with "its plagiarism" Your a fricken lowlife.
It creates a leftist spin of a point. If I had nothing better to do, I could write a similar article pointed in the other direction. There's no reason to respond to the "points" themselves, so we just point out how ignorant the poster is for not even being original.
It creates a leftist spin of a point. If I had nothing better to do, I could write a similar article pointed in the other direction. There's no reason to respond to the "points" themselves, so we just point out how ignorant the poster is for not even being original.
if it took him 12 seconds to copy & paste, he needs to work on his puter skillsplease tell me you didn't spend more than 12 seconds on this self-pitying drivel.
Hardly anyone on this board is original, they take bits and pieces of what they hear on the news, radio and what they have read and they just repeat it. This is why we end up in so many debates because what we find is that both sides do many of the same things and there is rarely ever a conclusion to the topic being debated. Take the mortgage crisis for example. As you know we have been in banking and we both know what happened but I see so many ignorant posts that are so scripted that I know they are using someone else line and it shows they have no idea what they are talking about. Thats just one example.
I try to bring ouside sources into the discussion, which everyone should be doing in their arguments.
Outstanding post.
That's it in a nutshell.
excuse me, but that is a msm talking point regarding how 'different' Obama is. Not to mention they got it from his first book.I'm a little confused. Let me see if I have this straight.....
* If you grow up in Hawaii , raised by your grandparents, you're "exotic,
different."
Says whom? Besides, what American isn't a 'quintessential' American story?* Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, a quintessential American story.
He chose to change his name. He made the name one of his 'differences', much like his upbringing. After calling attention to it, suddenly everyone is supposed to ignore it?* If your name is Barack you're a radical, unpatriotic Muslim.
Huh? Now you'd like to regulate naming kids? Sounds a bit like New Zealand.* Name your kids Willow , Trig and Track, you're a maverick.
Whenever has this canard been used? Got a link, whoops, not your thing.* Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable.
Where has this linkage been used, regarding whether or not she's 'stable?' On the contrary I'd say you are disappointed that people don't agree that it or what colleges she attended qualifies or disqualifies her from the office.* Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well
grounded.
Brilliant? How does receiving millions of dollars, doling them out, and then fail to accomplish anything beyond handing out someone else's largess, equate with 'brilliant'? Then there was the Woods project, similar results. This NYT piece touches on both, with a 10 foot pole. Coming from Chicago, we've heard about Barack's brilliance, but it has to do with politics, not community organization.* If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the
first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter
registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a
Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator
representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the
state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the
United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while
sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and
Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees, you don't have any real
leadership experience.
She's more qualified than Harry Truman was. She meets the constitutional qualifications, that's all that is necessary. Vote for her or not.* If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council
and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months
as the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you're qualified
to become the country's second highest ranking executive and next in line
behind a man in his eighth decade.
God damn America....* If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2
beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're not a real
Christian.
Wow, getting to the other candidate for the same office, great. Better than a cheating husband that gets drunk, sinks his car, gets out and runs away, while the girl drowns. For some reason McCain's ex manages to speak highly of him, go figure.* If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and then left
your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a true
Christian.
Who has said that anyone couldn't teach their own children sex education they feel is appropriate? Oh, you are speaking of the sex education bill that mandated teaching HIV, along with birth control methods down to kindergarten, but in an 'age appropriate manner'. Problem is, no way to do that with 5-8 year olds.* If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the
proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society.
This has already been proven untrue.* If, while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no
other option in sex education in your state's school system while your
unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant, you're very responsible.
Where did any of this happen? Oh yea, in the mind of the actual writer of these questions.* If your wife is a Harvard graduate laywer who gave up a position in a
prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city
community, then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values don't
represent America 's.
Lady Bird was an alcoholic, who went on to help millions. On the other hand, the actual candidate admits to cocaine use during the same years as the First Dude.* If you're husband is nicknamed "First Dude",with at least one DWI conviction and no college education, who didn't register to vote until age
25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, your family is extremely admirable.
Someone please explain?
I think that it is pointless to continue this topic. Time to go to another.
Why? He posted another's writing, without credit, yet picked up lots of 'good post' and asked for clarification, I and others tried.
Now it's time to move along?
I would like to think that I bring some originality to the board
