thermite and high explosives

[eots]

NIST SAYS FIRE CAUSED THE FAILURE OF A SINGLE COLUMN CAUSED THE COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 AND THE FAILURE OF THAT COLUMN UNDER ANY - CIRCUMSTANCE WOULD OF RESULTED IN A PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE



.

WHO SAYS IT TAKES MONTHS AND THAT IT MUST BE WIRED ?



Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org - YouTube


Danny Jowenko on WTC 7 controlled demolition - YouTube

Keep proving just how idiotic your claims are.

by showing your assertions are almost always wrong ?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Keep proving just how idiotic your claims are.

by showing your assertions are almost always wrong ?

There is ZERO evidence that explosives were laid in any of the buildings. I notice when NIST claims the pillar brought the building down you poo poo it. But when you want to claim a jury rigged explosive was used suddenly it is perfectly sensible? Which is it? Did the single pillar bring the building down or not?

How did anyone get in the building and to the pillar to lay explosives when fires raged in the building? How come no one saw these men and their explosives? Why if it were so important to bring the building down did they rely on a last minute jury rig you claim did not bring the building down?

YOU claimed the pillar could not bring the building down now suddenly when confronted with the reality that you can not justify a claim that explosives were used suddenly a single pillar DID bring it down.

For the slow and stupid, it requires months of planning and weeks of construction to wire a building for demolition of the type we are talking about. There is zero evidence any such construction occurred. Yet you keep claiming explosives brought down all 3 buildings.

You keep claiming the Pentagon was not hit by a jet liner. You keep claiming no plane crashed in Pennsylvania.

 

[eots]

by showing your assertions are almost always wrong ?

There is ZERO evidence that explosives were laid in any of the buildings. I notice when NIST claims the pillar brought the building down you poo poo it. But when you want to claim a jury rigged explosive was used suddenly it is perfectly sensible? Which is it? Did the single pillar bring the building down or not?

How did anyone get in the building and to the pillar to lay explosives when fires raged in the building? How come no one saw these men and their explosives? Why if it were so important to bring the building down did they rely on a last minute jury rig you claim did not bring the building down?

YOU claimed the pillar could not bring the building down now suddenly when confronted with the reality that you can not justify a claim that explosives were used suddenly a single pillar DID bring it down.

For the slow and stupid, it requires months of planning and weeks of construction to wire a building for demolition of the type we are talking about. There is zero evidence any such construction occurred. Yet you keep claiming explosives brought down all 3 buildings.

You keep claiming the Pentagon was not hit by a jet liner. You keep claiming no plane crashed in Pennsylvania.

you keep attributing words to me I have never said...why is that ?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

There is ZERO evidence that explosives were laid in any of the buildings. I notice when NIST claims the pillar brought the building down you poo poo it. But when you want to claim a jury rigged explosive was used suddenly it is perfectly sensible? Which is it? Did the single pillar bring the building down or not?

How did anyone get in the building and to the pillar to lay explosives when fires raged in the building? How come no one saw these men and their explosives? Why if it were so important to bring the building down did they rely on a last minute jury rig you claim did not bring the building down?

YOU claimed the pillar could not bring the building down now suddenly when confronted with the reality that you can not justify a claim that explosives were used suddenly a single pillar DID bring it down.

For the slow and stupid, it requires months of planning and weeks of construction to wire a building for demolition of the type we are talking about. There is zero evidence any such construction occurred. Yet you keep claiming explosives brought down all 3 buildings.

You keep claiming the Pentagon was not hit by a jet liner. You keep claiming no plane crashed in Pennsylvania.

you keep attributing words to me I have never said...why is that ?

You have said all those things. Your story changes with the weather. Tell ya what EOTS, this is your chance.

Tell us what YOU believe happened on 9/11 at all the sites.

 

[eots]

Shanksville...shot down...pentagon.. Unknown cover up....twin towers..wtc 7
controlled demolition

 

[Liability]

Shanksville...shot down...pentagon.. Unknown cover up....twin towers..wtc 7
controlled demolition

Now, for a limited time only, for EVERY incident in American History:

WE. HAVE. A. CONSPIRACY!

(We have no proof, but we do have LOTS of conspiracies!)

Conspiracies R US!

To get any loopier, you'd have to be id-eots, too!

 

[daws101]

Shanksville...shot down...pentagon.. Unknown cover up....twin towers..wtc 7
controlled demolition

based on what? since you have no credible evidence, it must be faith alone.

 

[Mr. Jones]

This whole procedure causes a lot of noise, and there's no way any conspirators could contain the resulting cacophany of demolition work. Everyone within several blocks would be aware that the building was undergoing major work. None of this could be achieved under the noses of any otherwise unsuspecting employees within the building.

The WTC towers had undergone extensive work and renovations providing assess. So there could have been plenty of opportunities to use the elevator shafts, evacuations, special access floors, and power downs to access and plant devices
on the core columns of the Twin Towers.
Bad guys could, of course, have forged maintenance badges or otherwise piggybacked onto legitimate maintenance efforts.

I agree that on first glance the way the building fell looks like explosive charges were used in its demise, but to achieve that you'd have to do the impossible by containing the secrecy of those complicit in such an outrage.

There have been many conspiracies that have remained secret for long periods of time, like the Manhattan Project, 130,000 people and a cost of 2 billion.
Trying to say that because we can't exactly figure out when, who, or how it was done, automatically gives you the right to throw away the laws of physics is a fail at countering the science of the collapses.

Realistically, your only option would be to murder them prior to detonation, as I can't see any of them willing to perpetuate the lie by volunteering their presence inside when the charges are detonated.

Trillions of missing dollars, and some of the most powerful people behind the scenes will keep people quiet. Ever hear of the Northwoods Project, and how long that was kept quiet?
The fact is that the mass of the buildings, especially the lower parts that were more robust, should not have provided "minimal resistance" and just moved out of the way and succumb to the destruction in the short amount of time the towers fell in.
That part of the explanation that NIST was tasked with, has NOT been explained. They just say assume that the falling mass pulverizing the lower parts of the towers, was to be expected, physics and science and the law of conservation of momentum be damned.
Those massive structures should not have collapsed in the short amount of time that they did without some "help".
To say this doesn't matter because no one has confessed is an absurdity.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Shanksville...shot down...pentagon.. Unknown cover up....twin towers..wtc 7
controlled demolition

based on what? since you have no credible evidence, it must be faith alone.

Trutherism is a religion to them.

And Dickey Gage named himself their Pope.

Avery, Rowe, Bermas, Griffin, Blevins, Wood & Chandler make up their College of cardinals.

 

[eots]

shanksville...shot down...pentagon.. Unknown cover up....twin towers..wtc 7
controlled demolition

now, for a limited time only, for every incident in american history:

We. Have. A. Conspiracy!

(we have no proof, but we do have lots of conspiracies!)

conspiracies r us!

To get any loopier, you'd have to be id-eots, too!

american history is full of documented conspiracies nipple-head

 

[eots]

shanksville...shot down...pentagon.. Unknown cover up....twin towers..wtc 7
controlled demolition

based on what? Since you have no credible evidence, it must be faith alone.

trutherism is a religion to them.

And dickey gage named himself their pope.

Avery, rowe, bermas, griffin, blevins, wood & chandler make up their college of cardinals.

its your faith based denial..is more "religious" in nature than science

 

[daws101]

based on what? Since you have no credible evidence, it must be faith alone.

trutherism is a religion to them.

And dickey gage named himself their pope.

Avery, rowe, bermas, griffin, blevins, wood & chandler make up their college of cardinals.

its your faith based denial..is more "religious" in nature than science

this coming from a guy who knew a guy who met a guy that watched the science channel once.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

based on what? Since you have no credible evidence, it must be faith alone.

trutherism is a religion to them.

And dickey gage named himself their pope.

Avery, rowe, bermas, griffin, blevins, wood & chandler make up their college of cardinals.

its your faith based denial..is more "religious" in nature than science

Find any det cord or radio controlled detonators at Ground Zero yet?

How about any photos of Flight 77 north of the Citgo station?

Or have you located the high power energy source for Judy's space beam? Or it's firing platform?

Has Herrit tested his "nano-thermite" paint chips in an inert gas atmosphere yet?

Until you can prove any of these things, all you have is a religion.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

trutherism is a religion to them.

And dickey gage named himself their pope.

Avery, rowe, bermas, griffin, blevins, wood & chandler make up their college of cardinals.

its your faith based denial..is more "religious" in nature than science

this coming from a guy who knew a guy who met a guy that watched the science channel once.

And didn't understand what they were saying.

 

[Xchel]

Thermite and Sulfer- Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition

 

[daws101]

This whole procedure causes a lot of noise, and there's no way any conspirators could contain the resulting cacophany of demolition work. Everyone within several blocks would be aware that the building was undergoing major work. None of this could be achieved under the noses of any otherwise unsuspecting employees within the building.

The WTC towers had undergone extensive work and renovations providing assess. So there could have been plenty of opportunities to use the elevator shafts, evacuations, special access floors, and power downs to access and plant devices
on the core columns of the Twin Towers.
Bad guys could, of course, have forged maintenance badges or otherwise piggybacked onto legitimate maintenance efforts.

I agree that on first glance the way the building fell looks like explosive charges were used in its demise, but to achieve that you'd have to do the impossible by containing the secrecy of those complicit in such an outrage.

There have been many conspiracies that have remained secret for long periods of time, like the Manhattan Project, 130,000 people and a cost of 2 billion.
Trying to say that because we can't exactly figure out when, who, or how it was done, automatically gives you the right to throw away the laws of physics is a fail at countering the science of the collapses.

Realistically, your only option would be to murder them prior to detonation, as I can't see any of them willing to perpetuate the lie by volunteering their presence inside when the charges are detonated.

Trillions of missing dollars, and some of the most powerful people behind the scenes will keep people quiet. Ever hear of the Northwoods Project, and how long that was kept quiet?
The fact is that the mass of the buildings, especially the lower parts that were more robust, should not have provided "minimal resistance" and just moved out of the way and succumb to the destruction in the short amount of time the towers fell in.
That part of the explanation that NIST was tasked with, has NOT been explained. They just say assume that the falling mass pulverizing the lower parts of the towers, was to be expected, physics and science and the law of conservation of momentum be damned.
Those massive structures should not have collapsed in the short amount of time that they did without some "help".
To say this doesn't matter because no one has confessed is an absurdity.

blah...blah...blah...blah....

 

[daws101]

Thermite and Sulfer- Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition

best source ever!

 

[Mr. Jones]

This whole procedure causes a lot of noise, and there's no way any conspirators could contain the resulting cacophany of demolition work. Everyone within several blocks would be aware that the building was undergoing major work. None of this could be achieved under the noses of any otherwise unsuspecting employees within the building.

The WTC towers had undergone extensive work and renovations providing assess. So there could have been plenty of opportunities to use the elevator shafts, evacuations, special access floors, and power downs to access and plant devices
on the core columns of the Twin Towers.
Bad guys could, of course, have forged maintenance badges or otherwise piggybacked onto legitimate maintenance efforts.


There have been many conspiracies that have remained secret for long periods of time, like the Manhattan Project, 130,000 people and a cost of 2 billion.
Trying to say that because we can't exactly figure out when, who, or how it was done, automatically gives you the right to throw away the laws of physics is a fail at countering the science of the collapses.

Realistically, your only option would be to murder them prior to detonation, as I can't see any of them willing to perpetuate the lie by volunteering their presence inside when the charges are detonated.

Trillions of missing dollars, and some of the most powerful people behind the scenes will keep people quiet. Ever hear of the Northwoods Project, and how long that was kept quiet?
The fact is that the mass of the buildings, especially the lower parts that were more robust, should not have provided "minimal resistance" and just moved out of the way and succumb to the destruction in the short amount of time the towers fell in.
That part of the explanation that NIST was tasked with, has NOT been explained. They just say assume that the falling mass pulverizing the lower parts of the towers, was to be expected, physics and science and the law of conservation of momentum be damned.
Those massive structures should not have collapsed in the short amount of time that they did without some "help".
To say this doesn't matter because no one has confessed is an absurdity.

blah...blah...blah...blah....

Nice dodge, proving once again that you can't counter the claims of just how absurd the shit you believe really is.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Hey TRUTHERS(can I have a cookie?). If there was so much thermite around that it was enough to demolish 3 buildings, why did they find so little iron and aluminum in the dust?

A study by the US Geological Survey (USGS) provides some analytical detail missing from the above study. It lists the elemental composition of a number of dust samples collected from outdoor and indoor locations. 3 The following table summarizes the percentages by weight of the more abundant elements in samples for which sulfur was measured.
sample element: percentage by weight
Si Ca Mg S Fe Al
WTC 01-02 21.20 15.01 3.11 1.33 4.13 4.13
WTC 01-03 26.30 9.58 2.23 0.87 2.16 2.75
WTC 01-14 15.30 17.65 2.83 4.32 1.87 2.86
WTC 01-15 13.60 18.58 2.64 5.40 1.87 2.59
WTC 01-16 17.00 13.36 1.79 3.68 1.92 2.27
WTC 01-21 12.80 18.94 2.68 5.10 1.49 2.73
WTC 01-22 17.00 16.80 2.77 3.70 2.78 2.78
WTC 01-25 13.20 20.37 3.29 4.03 1.33 3.28
WTC 01-27 15.20 19.51 3.04 4.29 1.72 3.05
WTC 01-28 13.80 19.65 2.83 4.56 1.80 2.95

9-11 Research: World Trade Center Dust

 

[daws101]

The WTC towers had undergone extensive work and renovations providing assess. So there could have been plenty of opportunities to use the elevator shafts, evacuations, special access floors, and power downs to access and plant devices
on the core columns of the Twin Towers.
Bad guys could, of course, have forged maintenance badges or otherwise piggybacked onto legitimate maintenance efforts.


There have been many conspiracies that have remained secret for long periods of time, like the Manhattan Project, 130,000 people and a cost of 2 billion.
Trying to say that because we can't exactly figure out when, who, or how it was done, automatically gives you the right to throw away the laws of physics is a fail at countering the science of the collapses.


Trillions of missing dollars, and some of the most powerful people behind the scenes will keep people quiet. Ever hear of the Northwoods Project, and how long that was kept quiet?
The fact is that the mass of the buildings, especially the lower parts that were more robust, should not have provided "minimal resistance" and just moved out of the way and succumb to the destruction in the short amount of time the towers fell in.
That part of the explanation that NIST was tasked with, has NOT been explained. They just say assume that the falling mass pulverizing the lower parts of the towers, was to be expected, physics and science and the law of conservation of momentum be damned.
Those massive structures should not have collapsed in the short amount of time that they did without some "help".
To say this doesn't matter because no one has confessed is an absurdity.

blah...blah...blah...blah....

Nice dodge, proving once again that you can't counter the claims of just how absurd the shit you believe really is.

blah ...etc...