There is no ObamaCare. Only ScotusCare

The fact is, he argued against it before he was elected. He argued for it after.

Yes, which is entirely consistent with him changing his mind on it. If you ave evidence to contrary then present it, otherwise what you say about his motivation is little beyond your own fantasy.

Heh... sure, man. Politicians never lie to elected. What the hell is wrong with me?

Was that what he meant by hope and Change (as in change his mind after selling a load of crap to his supporters) ?
 

From your first article:

In a landmark 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Affordable Care Act's insurance subsidies in every state.

The decision in the King v. Burwell case is a win for the White House. For Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the dissenting opinion, the majority opinion, which was authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, is a "defense of the indefensible."

The decision, Scalia wrote, "rewrites the law."

"We should start calling this law SCOTUScare," he wrote.

He continued: "Rather than rewriting the law under the pretense of interpreting it, the Court should have left it to Congress to decide what to do about the Act's limitation of tax credits to state exchanges," Scalia wrote.
 

Forum List

Back
Top