then and now

[Old Rocks]

As close as Muller can come to stating that "I was wrong, Hansen, et. al. were right.

http://berkeleyearth.org/Resources/Muller_Testimony_31_March_2011

In Summary
Despite potential biases in the data, methods of analysis can be used to reduce bias effects
well enough to enable us to measure long-term Earth temperature changes. Data integrity
is adequate. Based on our initial work at Berkeley Earth, I believe that some of the most
worrisome biases are less of a problem than I had previously thought.

 

[Si modo]

Seriously, Rocks. What part of the meaning of preliminary is so confusing to you?

I AM serious.

But, as I said, you are a true believer.

Recall that a belief is an acceptance of some truth without proof. You believe in preliminary results, and not science.

 

[IanC]

I really cant figure out why you are so sure of your version of what you think Muller said.

If BEST methodologies for splicing and adjusting temps are equivilent to GISS I would very surprised but we will soon see. I think places like Australia and NewZealand show more than a third of the warming is arbitrary adjustments. Like I said- we shall see when BEST releases more than preliminary results.

 

[jesereL]