The world starves because of USA foreign aid

[Mr.Fitnah]

We enable sloth and incivility on a global scale through programs.
Or maybe not .
But We aint fixing anything and it is time to try something else.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

If we give aid and it is gobbled up by a war lord who can dole out UN rice and we perpetuate that crime, we should stop.

 

[skookerasbil]

We enable sloth and incivility on a global scale through programs.
Or maybe not .
But We aint fixing anything and it is time to try something else.

This thread is the perfect illustration of why somebody started coining the phrase, "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder"...............or more to the point, "Liberals live in Disney".


Perhaps some liberal genius will come up with the idea of how to actually get food donations to the PEOPLE of these countries. Since liberals dont think there is evil and corruption in the world, IM guessing it will take quite some time!!!

 

[KissMy]

Liberals always want to slap countries with embargo's that starve the citizens & not the government who we have the problem with. They never have the balls to stand up to their leaders.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Starving Americans and making the dollar worthless is not going to nourish anyone or make them self sufficient. Unless that is the plan for ending foreign aid ?

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Id like to hear other theories from rational people.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Well thanks for reading my post.

 

[HUGGY]

Well thanks for reading my post.

Thanks for wasting my time. Your glib labeling of "liberals" to any effort to relieve suffering from starvation is breath taking. You are a weak little man. You do not understand the best principles of capitalism as Gates and Buffet display every day as they give back to the world some of the wealth they have rightfully accumulated. Apparently you disapprove. Piss on you for the focus of much of what you "share".

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Id like to hear other theories from rational people.

I never used the" glib title liberal" the problem in systemic and global.Put your self on a list and go shopping for choking hazards. You are wasting your own time you and other peoples resources.

 

[Lasher]

Liberals always want to slap countries with embargo's that starve the citizens & not the government who we have the problem with. They never have the balls to stand up to their leaders.

There are too many starving people in the world today, but it is not the problem of the American taxpayer, and we shouldn't have to bear the burden of feeding them. If they choose to proliferate like cockroaches, we should just let nature take its course and allow them to die out until they become few enough to feed themselves and learn to stop having offspring they can't feed.

We, in America, are borrowing money we will never be able to pay back, yet we are still spending that borrowed money on the rest of the world by fighting their wars, feeding them and attending to their calamities, along with doing the same at home for our own parasites. This can't go on much longer before we are a ruined, third-world nation.

 

[Lasher]

Well thanks for reading my post.

Thanks for wasting my time. Your glib labeling of "liberals" to any effort to relieve suffering from starvation is breath taking. You are a weak little man. You do not understand the best principles of capitalism as Gates and Buffet display every day as they give back to the world some of the wealth they have rightfully accumulated. Apparently you disapprove. Piss on you for the focus of much of what you "share".

Those two are wealthy enough to "give back" plenty, but they should do it willingly according to what they wish to "give." but we who are not so wealthy resent the government robbing us of our property without our consent as to where the loot will wind up. The two you mentioned surely don't believe that being robbed by a tyrannical government at the point of a gun for the benefit of total strangers is actually "giving."

Those of you who believe in taking other folks' property and redistributing it to the losers of the world are mean-spirited and uncaring of anyone who is successful through their own toil and effort and who wish to retain the fruit of their labor. We are not the greedy ones, it is you and your losers who are greedy for wanting the law to rob us for your benefit.

 

[Douger]

Liberals always want to slap countries with embargo's that starve the citizens & not the government who we have the problem with. They never have the balls to stand up to their leaders.

This can't go on much longer before we are a ruined, third-world nation.

Good morning.
Today is that day.
DRUDGE REPORT 2011®

 

[HUGGY]

Well thanks for reading my post.

Thanks for wasting my time. Your glib labeling of "liberals" to any effort to relieve suffering from starvation is breath taking. You are a weak little man. You do not understand the best principles of capitalism as Gates and Buffet display every day as they give back to the world some of the wealth they have rightfully accumulated. Apparently you disapprove. Piss on you for the focus of much of what you "share".

Those two are wealthy enough to "give back" plenty, but they should do it willingly according to what they wish to "give." but we who are not so wealthy resent the government robbing us of our property without our consent as to where the loot will wind up. The two you mentioned surely don't believe that being robbed by a tyrannical government at the point of a gun for the benefit of total strangers is actually "giving."

Those of you who believe in taking other folks' property and redistributing it to the losers of the world are mean-spirited and uncaring of anyone who is successful through their own toil and effort and who wish to retain the fruit of their labor. We are not the greedy ones, it is you and your losers who are greedy for wanting the law to rob us for your benefit.

I am not a "liberal". Starving diseased children are not "losers".

 

[LibocalypseNow]

The whole issue of Foreign Aid needs to be re-examined. The People currently have no input in the decision process. They just quietly automatically give $Billions in American Tax Dollars to any Nation they choose. The People should definitely have more say in this. After all,we have our own Massive Unemployment,Record Poverty,and Massive Debt here at home. In these times especially,it's even more important for us to debate dramatically cutting back on Foreign Aid. Right now they don't debate it openly & publicly. They do it very quietly when no one's paying attention. Foreign Aid should be openly debated in Congress on a Nation by Nation basis. Time to give the People more say.

 

[JBeukema]

The solution:

In much of Africa and other impoverished areas where the land cannot sustain the population, reception of food and other aid will depend upon enrollment and sterilization.

It is the highest degree evil to knowing and willfully continue to bring children into the world knowing they will starve. We've been artificially inflating the population and encouraging them these people to breed, thereby making the problem worse. To receive aid, they must be required to undergo a procedure to ensure they will not contribute to the problem of an unsustainable population. Many regions simply cannot sustain a large population anymore.

 

[hipeter924]

History Lesson:

1) Colonial Empires build agricultural infrastructure as well as dismantle traditional agriculture.

2) Colonial Empires leave/forced out. Poor Education of the new landowners* and government incompetence/corruption, as well as war over territory (in Africa tribe by tribe as Colonial policy was to divide and rule).

3) Mass starvation across Africa and the third world, no access to foreign markets, however local agricultural production was increasing to meet demand.

4) Western nations (US, EU and so on...) send food aid and undercut and charge less than local producers, which collapses the local production of agriculture.

Today:

Exponentially increasing population well exceeding the increase in agricultural production (and in some places that production is decreasing) with food aid and foreign food suppliers constantly undermining local production, also barring from western markets cripples economic development.

The food bank and the rest should be on the dock for Genocide, but people want to 'help' them more?

*If you want a good example take Mugabe's Zimbabwe, where his uneducated thugs took over farms from white and black Zimbabwean farmers.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Massive Foreign Aid Packages are always snuck in with no input from the People. These Packages need to be more openly & publicly debated. It's just like their recent START Treaty. No real debate occurred before they passed that one. Most People would not have agreed to that Treaty if they were allowed to be included in the decision-process. Yet it passed very quietly with almost no debate. The Politicians clearly have a deep disdain for allowing the People to be involved with decisions. It's a very Un-American philosophy. The People need to stand up and demand involvement in these decisions. Nothing will change unless the People stand up.

 

[skookerasbil]

Id like to hear other theories from rational people.

fAiL........rationaly people on these forums care not to visit Disney!!!


Its threads like this one that reminds me of the "thatched cottage" concept normally associated with far left guys.........

 

[Lasher]

Thanks for wasting my time. Your glib labeling of "liberals" to any effort to relieve suffering from starvation is breath taking. You are a weak little man. You do not understand the best principles of capitalism as Gates and Buffet display every day as they give back to the world some of the wealth they have rightfully accumulated. Apparently you disapprove. Piss on you for the focus of much of what you "share".

Those two are wealthy enough to "give back" plenty, but they should do it willingly according to what they wish to "give." but we who are not so wealthy resent the government robbing us of our property without our consent as to where the loot will wind up. The two you mentioned surely don't believe that being robbed by a tyrannical government at the point of a gun for the benefit of total strangers is actually "giving."

Those of you who believe in taking other folks' property and redistributing it to the losers of the world are mean-spirited and uncaring of anyone who is successful through their own toil and effort and who wish to retain the fruit of their labor. We are not the greedy ones, it is you and your losers who are greedy for wanting the law to rob us for your benefit.

I am not a "liberal". Starving diseased children are not "losers".

Nor are they my problem.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Thanks for wasting my time. Your glib labeling of "liberals" to any effort to relieve suffering from starvation is breath taking. You are a weak little man. You do not understand the best principles of capitalism as Gates and Buffet display every day as they give back to the world some of the wealth they have rightfully accumulated. Apparently you disapprove. Piss on you for the focus of much of what you "share".

Those two are wealthy enough to "give back" plenty, but they should do it willingly according to what they wish to "give." but we who are not so wealthy resent the government robbing us of our property without our consent as to where the loot will wind up. The two you mentioned surely don't believe that being robbed by a tyrannical government at the point of a gun for the benefit of total strangers is actually "giving."

Those of you who believe in taking other folks' property and redistributing it to the losers of the world are mean-spirited and uncaring of anyone who is successful through their own toil and effort and who wish to retain the fruit of their labor. We are not the greedy ones, it is you and your losers who are greedy for wanting the law to rob us for your benefit.

I am not a "liberal". Starving diseased children are not "losers".

Bill G and buffet are giving back? No .They are giving to support a political vision .Huntsman is giving it away to help people with cancer.