Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't think Republicans or Democrats really care if they get voted out every couple of years any more. They'll take corporate campaign contributions, try and scratch corporate backs as much as they can, and then take cushy corporate jobs on their way out.
Campaign finance reform, my friends. The federal government could have financed every candidate equal to their opponents so people could compete on ideas and not air time. Campaigns should be 100% publicly financed and there should be no financial inequality between opposing campaigns.
I don't think Republicans or Democrats really care if they get voted out every couple of years any more. They'll take corporate campaign contributions, try and scratch corporate backs as much as they can, and then take cushy corporate jobs on their way out.
Campaign finance reform, my friends. The federal government could have financed every candidate equal to their opponents so people could compete on ideas and not air time. Campaigns should be 100% publicly financed and there should be no financial inequality between opposing campaigns.
youre right, thats how it should be. but then again, rich people should have the same representation in court as poor people so every offender goes to prison and not just to rehab in beverly hills if youre lyndsie lohan, but that doesnt happen, does it?
It is my thesis that the latest election has nothing to do with the policy prescriptions of either party. Rather, it has to do with a deep seeded notion that grows every day that not only Washington but America itself is broken. From the department of war (ridiculously called defense) to corporations, to banks, to school boards to departement of public works in anthill sized towns, the "average Joe" just perceives that the system, in the widest sense of that word, is not responding to his needs.
Republicans did not win this election cause the people want some inane strict constitutionalism or radical libertarianism. In the previous two elections Democrats did not win because the people wanted a massive expansion of government involvement in the economy. Both parties won in those years for the same reason. The American voter is simply doing what they do, throwing out the party in power and putting in the other team. They will keep doing this, repeatedly, till something fundamental changes in the system, in the widest sense of that word.
Thus, the winning message is not "really" based on policy. The winning political message is to attack institutions, all kinds of institutions, repeatedly and then, once you get power, the way to retain it will be to get to work changing those institutions so that the "average Joe" perceives that you are at least trying to improve his lot in life.
Consider the New Deal. By any honest account, much of the early New Deal failed, miserably. Did the voters punish the Dems for this? No. Why? Cause they PERCEIVED that the system was TRYING to change and to change in thier favor.
The back and forth turbulence of the present body politic is inexorably moving in one direction. Radical change. The people who finally gain and HOLD power, like the dems did in the 30s and held on for 40 years, will be those who are willing to openly criticize the system, in the widest sense of that word, and then get about showing a lot of activity toward changing said system.
The new, New Deal is what is coming. Clearly I think it isn't going to be this crop of tea baggers that is going to bring it about.
Oh fuck. I think I actually agree, for the most part, with nutty boy on this one.
Come to the light Jeremy. Come to the light.
... for the most part...