The winning continues

[edward37]

It took President Trump just a year and a half to solve the North Korea problem. So much winning - exactly as he said we would.

Kim Jong-un tells South Korea he will abandon nuclear weapons if US promises to not invade

IF he achieves what he's trying to achieve he deserves a pat on the back ,,,but don't worry,,he'll give it to himself

Wow...you are literally the first progressive I have ever heard willing to give President Trump credit where credit is due. Kudos.

Right is right Should be many others willing to give him Kudos

 

[P@triot]

The winning continues...just as President Trump promised!

MANCHESTER, N.H. (Reuters) - Enthusiasm for the Democratic Party is waning among millennials as its candidates head into the crucial midterm congressional elections, according to the Reuters/Ipsos national opinion poll.

Yeah...well that is what happens when Republicans deliver unprecedented prosperity while Dumbocrats promise to help illegal aliens, support sexually deviant predators, and provide for parasites.

Exclusive: Democrats lose ground with millennials - Reuters/Ipsos poll

 

[P@triot]

What President Trump (and the Republican's) have done is nothing short of astounding. They have built one of the best economies in U.S. history...

Throughout the March quarter, Apple has paid over $3.2 billion in dividends, and they have plans to boost those payments up another 16% going forward. And the hits just keep on coming for Apple investors.

Apple has also announced the construction of a new mega-campus, and they’re looking at adding over 20,000 new jobs. Over the next 5 years, they’ll add $350 billion to the US economy.

Nancy Pelosi tried to call the tax cuts "crumbs". The results have not even been the whole bag of bread - they've been the whole damn bakery!!! Record highs in the market. Record lows in unemployment. Companies investing in their people and their infrastructure (just as history has proven over and over and over).

Sorry Nancy Pelosi, Apple’s record-shattering buyback program is proof positive tax breaks work

 

[candycorn]

What President Trump (and the Republican's) have done is nothing short of astounding. They have built one of the best economies in U.S. history...

Throughout the March quarter, Apple has paid over $3.2 billion in dividends, and they have plans to boost those payments up another 16% going forward. And the hits just keep on coming for Apple investors.

Apple has also announced the construction of a new mega-campus, and they’re looking at adding over 20,000 new jobs. Over the next 5 years, they’ll add $350 billion to the US economy.

Nancy Pelosi tried to call the tax cuts "crumbs". The results have not even been the whole bag of bread - they've been the whole damn bakery!!! Record highs in the market. Record lows in unemployment. Companies investing in their people and their infrastructure (just as history has proven over and over and over).

Sorry Nancy Pelosi, Apple’s record-shattering buyback program is proof positive tax breaks work

Meanwhile back in reality what happens in these buybacks is this:

IF your company is valued at, lets dumb it down for Conservatives, a dollar and there are 100 shares outstanding, each share is worth a penny. If you buy back 50 shares, the shares outstanding double in value to two pennies.

The reason all of these companies are using Trumps’ tax payer funded gifts to not raise pay of the guys who get their hands dirty but to buy back stock is to reduce the number of shares outstanding. This makes the stock more valuable. Now, who benefits from that? The shareholders. The more you own, the more you benefit. So the corporate officers, chairperson of the board, CEO, etc… benefit disproportionately. All due to the tax break you’re paying for.

Apple says thank you.

 

[P@triot]

IF your company is valued at, lets dumb it down for Conservatives, a dollar and there are 100 shares outstanding, each share is worth a penny. If you buy back 50 shares, the shares outstanding double in value to two pennies.

Which means every hedge fund, every 401k, every pension, etc. instantly doubles their returns in that particular stock. Like you said - it makes each stock more valuable.

Sorry CC, you can’t spin this type of success into a “failure” no matter how hard you try.

 

[candycorn]

IF your company is valued at, lets dumb it down for Conservatives, a dollar and there are 100 shares outstanding, each share is worth a penny. If you buy back 50 shares, the shares outstanding double in value to two pennies.

Which means every hedge fund, every 401k, every pension, etc. instantly doubles their returns in that particular stock. Like you said - it makes each stock more valuable.

Sorry CC, you can’t spin this type of success into a “failure” no matter how hard you try.

There is no success. Only substantial stock owners benefit from this gift to the 1% paid for by the middle class. Nobody else. As for your fantasy about 401k plans and pensions, growth happens when the value of each share does go up…it also contracts when it goes down. What hurts 401ks and pensions is higher stock prices because you cannot purchase additional shares for the same price…because if the stock price does go down, you are insulated by having more stock. Temporary increases in share price do little unless you happen to be right at retirement age. And thanks to the same 1% that we just gave this wonderful gift to; many of us will never retire because we can’t afford to.

 

[P@triot]

What hurts 401ks and pensions is higher stock prices because you cannot purchase additional shares for the same price…

CC first makes the case that the buy back is some incredible source of wealth for CEO’s. But she wants you to believe it is simultaneously bad for anyone else who owns the same stock as the CEO’s.

 

[P@triot]

What hurts 401ks and pensions is higher stock prices because you cannot purchase additional shares for the same price…

Snowflake...money isn’t made by buying stock. Money is made when selling stock. And you want that price high when you sell.

(Psst...buy low - sell high)

 

[edward37]

What hurts 401ks and pensions is higher stock prices because you cannot purchase additional shares for the same price…

Snowflake...money isn’t made by buying stock. Money is made when selling stock. And you want that price high when you sell.

(Psst...buy low - sell high)

Damn the great info one gets here thanks pat

 

[candycorn]

What hurts 401ks and pensions is higher stock prices because you cannot purchase additional shares for the same price…

CC first makes the case that the buy back is some incredible source of wealth for CEO’s. But she wants you to believe it is simultaneously bad for anyone else who owns the same stock as the CEO’s.

Again; you lie about what I stated. And you know it. I’ll state it once more.

The number of shares is more important than the share value that fluctuates wildly under an unstable President like your messiah.
The companies understand this which is why they are buying back more of the shares and, thanks to the gift they got from the middle class, corporations are able to buy back copious amounts of shares.

 

[P@triot]

The number of shares is more important than the share value that fluctuates wildly under an unstable President like your messiah. The companies understand this which is why they are buying back more of the shares and, thanks to the gift they got from the middle class, corporations are able to buy back copious amounts of shares.

Which means everyone who is selling is making money. Serious money.

Oh...and let’s not forget how they are creating jobs.

 

[P@triot]

What hurts 401ks and pensions is higher stock prices because you cannot purchase additional shares for the same price…

CC first makes the case that the buy back is some incredible source of wealth for CEO’s. But she wants you to believe it is simultaneously bad for anyone else who owns the same stock as the CEO’s.

Again; you lie about what I stated. And you know it.

It is all there for everyone to see it, sweetie. You can’t turn this astounding success into a negative no matter how hard you try.

 

[P@triot]

The entire world is properly crediting President Trump for “this”, snowflake.

“President Trump’s peace through strength policies are working and bringing peace to the Korean Peninsula,” the congressmen write.

Barack Insane Obama set the entire Middle East on fire, alienatied all U.S. allies, and emboldened all U.S. enemies over his 8 year reign of terror. It took President Trump just a year and a half to solve the North Korea problem.

18 House Members Put Trump Up for Nobel Prize

 

[candycorn]

The number of shares is more important than the share value that fluctuates wildly under an unstable President like your messiah. The companies understand this which is why they are buying back more of the shares and, thanks to the gift they got from the middle class, corporations are able to buy back copious amounts of shares.

Which means everyone who is selling is making money. Serious money.

Oh...and let’s not forget how they are creating jobs.

hiring more butlers…gardeners…someone to scrub barnacles off the hull

 

[P@triot]

hiring more butlers…gardeners…someone to scrub barnacles off the hull

Only a progressive parasite believes those jobs are “beneath” them.

 

[candycorn]

hiring more butlers…gardeners…someone to scrub barnacles off the hull

Only a progressive parasite believes those jobs are “beneath” them.

There not beneath me…but over your head.

 

[P@triot]

There not beneath me…but over your head.

 

[candycorn]

There not beneath me…but over your head.

View attachment 191628

I guess when all you can do is cite minor spelling errors, you lost the argument…once again.

 

[P@triot]

I guess when all you can do is cite minor spelling errors, you lost the argument…once again.

That wasn’t a “spelling error”, my dear. You spelled “there” correctly. Unfortunately, the word you needed was “they’re” (as in the contraction for “they are”).

 

[candycorn]

I guess when all you can do is cite minor spelling errors, you lost the argument…once again.

That wasn’t a “spelling error”, my dear. You spelled “there” correctly. Unfortunately, the word you needed was “they’re” (as in the contraction for “they are”).