The waters, they are arising

[Old Rocks]

Clear and present danger.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Clear and present MORON's....



This crap has been refuted time and time again. I am surprised that these fools tried this.

 

[Old Rocks]

OK, silly asshole, post the links to the refutations. This is a presentation at the annual AGU conferance in San Francisco. Only the best and brightest are invited to do presentations.

 

[IanC]

Clear and present MORON's....



This crap has been refuted time and time again. I am surprised that these fools tried this.

Clear and present MORON's....



This crap has been refuted time and time again. I am surprised that these fools tried this.

But...but...but...the models say the water is going to rise real soon now! When have the models ever been wrong?

Same old crap. 1.2 meters by 2100! Hahahahaha, unsubstantiated nonsense.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Clear and present MORON's....



This crap has been refuted time and time again. I am surprised that these fools tried this.

So being a research scientist = moron. Find something out new every day.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Clear and present MORON's....



This crap has been refuted time and time again. I am surprised that these fools tried this.

Clear and present MORON's....



This crap has been refuted time and time again. I am surprised that these fools tried this.

But...but...but...the models say the water is going to rise real soon now! When have the models ever been wrong?

Same old crap. 1.2 meters by 2100! Hahahahaha, unsubstantiated nonsense.

rising at 3mm/year. If we warm another 1c between now and 2100 this rate could go up some... 3mm/year is about 10 inches in 85 years.

 

[william the wie]

How recently has that 3mm been confirmed with non-adjusted numbers?

 

[ScienceRocks]

How recently has that 3mm been confirmed with non-adjusted numbers?

Nov 4th of this year
CU Sea Level Research Group University of Colorado

The black line in the middle is the means of around 3mm/year.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Guam is going to tip over!

 

[westwall]

OK, silly asshole, post the links to the refutations. This is a presentation at the annual AGU conferance in San Francisco. Only the best and brightest are invited to do presentations.

Here you go. This one is even from them. Of course they always have to do their "adjustments" to get what they want. Their isostatic adjustments are cute, but they are totally misleading. They are measuring VOLUME, not sea level. Funny how you silly people ignore that fact. Further, the LAND is rising, it was after all under the weight of all of that ice. The ocean basins though, weren't. So, if anything isostatic rebound LESSENS the possible effect of sea level rise. But that's called science.

2014_rel5: Global Mean Sea Level Time Series (seasonal signals removed)


CU Sea Level Research Group University of Colorado

 

[Old Rocks]

2014 rel5 Global Mean Sea Level Time Series seasonal signals removed CU Sea Level Research Group

Hmmmmmmmm.............

 

[Old Rocks]

​

Sea Level Trends - NOAA Tides and Currents

Funny how you continually lie about everything, Walleyes. Here is a map of the sea level rise in North America. The only place that you are seeing isostatic rebound having an effect is in Canada. Along the Oregon and Washington coast you have an active subduction zone, yet the rise is fast enough that there are more areas of sea level rise than fall.

 

[elektra]

another Crock of Old Crock.

 

[jc456]

another Crock of Old Crock.

hahahahahahaahahahahahaha, that is some knee slappin words there!!!!!

 

[elektra]

another Crock of Old Crock.

hahahahahahaahahahahahaha, that is some knee slappin words there!!!!!

you think the sky is falling?

 

[skookerasbil]

meh

Theyve been saying this for 25 years.........nobody cares anymore.

 

[mamooth]

I'd like to hear Westwall explain why he thought the ENSO adjustments, which jitter around zero, had anything to do with anything. Some years the adjustments push the line up a little, some years down, but the overall effect on the trend is zilch.

He just tossed out the graph and declared it proved his case somehow. I'm guessing that, as usual, he had no idea of what the science meant, being he didn't have a denier blog at hand to tell him what to parrot.

 

[jc456]

I'd like to hear Westwall explain why he thought the ENSO adjustments, which jitter around zero, had anything to do with anything. Some years the adjustments push the line up a little, some years down, but the overall effect on the trend is zilch.

He just tossed out the graph and declared it proved his case somehow. I'm guessing that, as usual, he had no idea of what the science meant, being he didn't have a denier blog at hand to tell him what to parrot.

Well I'd like to see an experiment that actually proves any of what you're talking about.

 

[jc456]

another Crock of Old Crock.

hahahahahahaahahahahahaha, that is some knee slappin words there!!!!!

you think the sky is falling?

was that question for me?

 

[elektra]

another Crock of Old Crock.

hahahahahahaahahahahahaha, that is some knee slappin words there!!!!!

you think the sky is falling?

was that question for me?

I do not know, seems you laughed at my post, I guess it was dumb, I should just say another Crock of shit from Old Crock, but I was trying to be nice.