The Washington Post Should Tell You When Its Columnists Are Paid to Disinform You

[Disir]

If you’re getting paid to advocate for the destruction of the world as we know it, shouldn’t you at least let people know?

The Washington Post apparently doesn’t think so.

....The Post‘s bio for Rogers notes that he “is the chairman of the lobbying and communications firm BGR Group,” but it doesn’t give any clue who his clients are. Luckily, lobbyists are required by law to disclose their clients, a fact the media critic known as @crushingbort made good use of:

The Washington Post Should Tell You When Its Columnists Are Paid to Disinform You FAIR

What I find amazing is that Rogers doesn't give detail into what those other problems are. He isn't paid to.

 

[Rozman]

USMB should have the same policy here.
I wonder how many members would admit that they are paid for their posts.