The Warmer's Hypothesis

[CrusaderFrank]

Are deminimus, incremental increases in the atmospheric trace element CO2 solely responsible for instantaneous, cataclysmic and irreversible changes in Earth's climate?

 

[Big Black Dog]

Geese shitting in flight is what is causing all the problems with our atmosphere. Nothing else.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No comment from the Decline Hiders?

 

[wirebender]

No comment from the Decline Hiders?

You didn't really expect any did you?

 

[ScienceRocks]

I'm really not to sure myself. Just stated what I've been told from warmers...We will see within the next decade if they're right or wrong.

 

[Oddball]

That's what the warmists said last decade....and the decade before.....

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I’d have a tad more respect for the right if they’d admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the ‘One World Government,’ hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.

 

[rdean]

Emanuel sees himself as a conservative. He believes marriage is between a man and a woman. He backs a strong military. He almost always votes Republican and admires Ronald Reagan.

Emanuel is also a highly regarded professor of atmospheric science at MIT. And based on his work on hurricanes and the research of his peers, Emanuel has concluded that the scientific data show a powerful link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.

Conservative scientists take on climate change deniers | Deseret News

Texas Tech atmospheric scientist Katharine Hayhoe is an evangelical Christian who travels widely talking to conservative audiences and wrote a book with her husband, a pastor and former climate change denier, explaining climate change to skeptics.

A physicist by training, John Cook is an evangelical Christian who runs the website skepticalscience.com, which seeks to debunk climate change deniers' arguments.

Barry Bickmore is a Mormon, a professor of geochemistry at Brigham Young University and the blogger behind Anti-Climate Change Extremism in Utah, where he recently rebuked Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) for his climate views and posted editorials mentioning his Republican affiliation.

------------------------------------------------------

You gotta admit, it's pretty fucking hilarious these "right wing conservative scientists" think they still belong to the Republican Party.'

HELLO!

That party doesn't want you. No academics. No "elites". No "smarts". NOT WANTED in the Republican Party. Sheesh, what does it take to get through?

 

[wirebender]

I’d have a tad more respect for the right if they’d admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the ‘One World Government,’ hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.

Actually, my entire argument is founded in science. Care to examine some laws of physics and do some math?

 

[percysunshine]

Emanuel sees himself as a conservative. ..... Sheesh, what does it take to get through?

I am begining to believe that rdean is Rahm Emanuel.

Nothing else makes sense.

 

[Old Rocks]

I’d have a tad more respect for the right if they’d admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the ‘One World Government,’ hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.

Actually, my entire argument is founded in science. Care to examine some laws of physics and do some math?

 

[daveman]

I’d have a tad more respect for the right if they’d admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science...

Well, except for the "science" that's being used to prove AGW -- the "science" that's distorted, massaged, cherry-picked, and promoted with a bastardized peer-review process.

...and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the ‘One World Government,’ hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.

Well, if every proposed "solution" to AGW didn't involve recommendation of all that, perhaps there'd be less opposition to it.

Say, can you answer this question? No one else has been able to:

If the promoters of man-made climate fears truly believed the "debate is over" and the science is "settled", why is there such a strong impulse to shut down debate and threaten those who disagree?​

 

[daveman]

Emanuel sees himself as a conservative. He believes marriage is between a man and a woman. He backs a strong military. He almost always votes Republican and admires Ronald Reagan.

Emanuel is also a highly regarded professor of atmospheric science at MIT. And based on his work on hurricanes and the research of his peers, Emanuel has concluded that the scientific data show a powerful link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.

Conservative scientists take on climate change deniers | Deseret News

Texas Tech atmospheric scientist Katharine Hayhoe is an evangelical Christian who travels widely talking to conservative audiences and wrote a book with her husband, a pastor and former climate change denier, explaining climate change to skeptics.

A physicist by training, John Cook is an evangelical Christian who runs the website skepticalscience.com, which seeks to debunk climate change deniers' arguments.

Barry Bickmore is a Mormon, a professor of geochemistry at Brigham Young University and the blogger behind Anti-Climate Change Extremism in Utah, where he recently rebuked Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) for his climate views and posted editorials mentioning his Republican affiliation.

------------------------------------------------------

You gotta admit, it's pretty fucking hilarious these "right wing conservative scientists" think they still belong to the Republican Party.'

HELLO!

That party doesn't want you. No academics. No "elites". No "smarts". NOT WANTED in the Republican Party. Sheesh, what does it take to get through?

If they're conservatives, why do you believe them? Conservatives are anti-science, right? People of faith are irrational, right?

Poor dean. He desperately wants to have it both ways, but he can't.

 

[Old Rocks]

Daveboy, Dean is quoting real scientists who happen to be conservatives. What you wingnuts are stating is that virtually all the scientists in the world, from every kind of political organization that exists, are in on some sort of conspiracy. A regular tinfoil hat brigade is what you are.

 

[Richard-H]

Are deminimus, incremental increases in the atmospheric trace element CO2 solely responsible for instantaneous, cataclysmic and irreversible changes in Earth's climate?

Wow, what a loaded question!

First, according to dictionary.com, there is no such word as "deminimus".

Secondly, the use of the word "solely"

Third, the use of the word "instantaneous"

Fourth, "irreversible"

It doesn't get more loaded that that!

How about you create a liberal strawman, put words in his mouth that no liberal has every spoken, then declare that the bunk that you made up is what all "liberals" believe and dare them to support it.

Typical sleazy wingnut tactics!

 

[Richard-H]

Emanuel sees himself as a conservative. He believes marriage is between a man and a woman. He backs a strong military. He almost always votes Republican and admires Ronald Reagan.

Emanuel is also a highly regarded professor of atmospheric science at MIT. And based on his work on hurricanes and the research of his peers, Emanuel has concluded that the scientific data show a powerful link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.

Conservative scientists take on climate change deniers | Deseret News

Texas Tech atmospheric scientist Katharine Hayhoe is an evangelical Christian who travels widely talking to conservative audiences and wrote a book with her husband, a pastor and former climate change denier, explaining climate change to skeptics.

A physicist by training, John Cook is an evangelical Christian who runs the website skepticalscience.com, which seeks to debunk climate change deniers' arguments.

Barry Bickmore is a Mormon, a professor of geochemistry at Brigham Young University and the blogger behind Anti-Climate Change Extremism in Utah, where he recently rebuked Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) for his climate views and posted editorials mentioning his Republican affiliation.

------------------------------------------------------

You gotta admit, it's pretty fucking hilarious these "right wing conservative scientists" think they still belong to the Republican Party.'

HELLO!

That party doesn't want you. No academics. No "elites". No "smarts". NOT WANTED in the Republican Party. Sheesh, what does it take to get through?

If they're conservatives, why do you believe them? Conservatives are anti-science, right? People of faith are irrational, right?

Poor dean. He desperately wants to have it both ways, but he can't.

Not all conservatives are complete jackasses...present company excepted!

 

[Richard-H]

I’d have a tad more respect for the right if they’d admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the ‘One World Government,’ hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.

Actually, my entire argument is founded in science. Care to examine some laws of physics and do some math?

Here's some math for you:

Your banner says that the estimate for MAY is -0.179 degrees lower than the yearly historical average.

Holy shit! That's only MAY! Maybe you need to go back to grade school and learn the basics of Earth's orbit around the Sun.

It got news for you - hottest part of the year is yet to come. If we're only at -0.179 degrees below the yearly average already in May, the full yearly average for this year is going to be quite a bit higher than the historical average.

Thanks for proving the Earth is apparently considerably warmer this year than the historical average!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Are deminimus, incremental increases in the atmospheric trace element CO2 solely responsible for instantaneous, cataclysmic and irreversible changes in Earth's climate?

Wow, what a loaded question!

First, according to dictionary.com, there is no such word as "deminimus".

Secondly, the use of the word "solely"

Third, the use of the word "instantaneous"

Fourth, "irreversible"

It doesn't get more loaded that that!

How about you create a liberal strawman, put words in his mouth that no liberal has every spoken, then declare that the bunk that you made up is what all "liberals" believe and dare them to support it.

Typical sleazy wingnut tactics!

Because none of the Warmers and Decline Hiders has taken up the challenge, I'm taking the sum of everything they've put froward and expressing it in a hypothesis.

Allegedly, CO2 has increased by 100PPM over the past 150 years of which some percentage was added by mankind and this caused has caused hurricane Katrina, the Midwest tornado, tsunamis, record snowfall in New York.

De minimis, because that's what it is. It's less than a rounding error.

Solely, because the Warmers have told us they've eliminated all other variables and are identifying the additional CO2 as the culprit

Instantaneous, because they tell us that how it works.

Irreversible, have you read the literature? According to MIT's Wheel of Climate Change, we're going to be 5 to 7 degree warmer.

That's what the Warmers are telling us is happening

 

[theHawk]

I’d have a tad more respect for the right if they’d admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the ‘One World Government,’ hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.

It doesn't have anything to do with all that, it has to do with scientific fact. The fact that several times in Earth's history the global tempature has been much warmer than it is today, and yet the world did not end.

The fact that ever since the last ice age, the global tempature has been steadily rising naturally.

You know, all those silly little facts that liberals choose to ignore.

So, a more appropriate question might be, would liberals believe in global warming if it weren't for the fact that they are trying to use it to enforce policies that would hurt the US economically?

 

[daveman]

Daveboy, Dean is quoting real scientists who happen to be conservatives. What you wingnuts are stating is that virtually all the scientists in the world, from every kind of political organization that exists, are in on some sort of conspiracy. A regular tinfoil hat brigade is what you are.

If you weren't such a braindead moron, you'd know about dean's irrational hatred of and bigotry against conservatives.

But, alas, you are.