The Views You've Been Trained To Accept

1. The Left, in endorsing the collective over the individual, misunderstands the aspirations of human kind. And, also incorrect, the corollary, that human nature is malleable and can be altered by just the right governance.
.

The very beginning of the OP is a biased opinion. All that follows are attempts to prove an opinion. But it will never be anything more than an opinion. Liberals misunderstand the aspirations of human kind is the opinion. The other opinion being demanded to be recognized is that human nature is malleable and can be altered by governance. Ignore the fact that humans have been adjusting human nature since people lived in caves, long before liberal ideology existed.
 
And PC's OP flutters and sputters.
'twas ever thus for PoliSpice threads :boohoo:
She runs away, as always.
You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem." Now, since you can't back it up, you're attempting to ignore it. Do folks in your real life recognize what a fraud you are, too?
Common knowledge, sis. You write nonsense. Yes, you admit you are a fraud.
 
1. The Left, in endorsing the collective over the individual, misunderstands the aspirations of human kind. And, also incorrect, the corollary, that human nature is malleable and can be altered by just the right governance.
.

The very beginning of the OP is a biased opinion. All that follows are attempts to prove an opinion. But it will never be anything more than an opinion. Liberals misunderstand the aspirations of human kind is the opinion. The other opinion being demanded to be recognized is that human nature is malleable and can be altered by governance. Ignore the fact that humans have been adjusting human nature since people lived in caves, long before liberal ideology existed.



"Liberals misunderstand the aspirations of human kind is the opinion. The other opinion being demanded to be recognized is that human nature is malleable and can be altered by governance. Ignore the fact that humans have been adjusting human nature since people lived in caves, long before liberal ideology existed."

Well....at least you've tried to refer to a specific in the thread!

Of course, that simply makes it easy to ram it right back down your throat.

1. Human nature has never changed.
That's the reason for checks and balances in our memorializing documents.

a. Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person (Russian: новый советский человек), as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


b. Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :
"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will"


c. In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html___




How's that working out?

2. “Culture is a stubborn opponent. The Soviet Union attempted to create the New Soviet Man with gulags, psychiatric hospitals, and firing squads for seventy years and succeeded only in producing a more corrupt culture.”
Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 198



3. "So where, in this landscape, do we find them, the New Men? Where is homo Sovieticus, that new breed of ‘fully human' human beings?"
Martin Amis

a. "In the gulags, there were the 'dokhodyaga,' the goners.
"Goner' (доходяга) — camp slang for prisoner who was so exhausted by work and wasted by disease that he had little to live for, commonly used in Soviet gulags. "
The Goner


b. One finds them "rummaging thorough the garbage, eating rancid scraps of meat, chewing fish skeletons- -such behavior was so common that no one noticed."
"Man Is Wolf to Man: Surviving the Gulag,"by Janusz Bardach(Author),Kathleen Gleeson


c.The goners became ‘semi-idiots,'‘whom no amount of beating could drive from the refuse heaps'.Consider that: no amount of beating. If the scraps were thrown into the latrine, then the goners went in after them. ‘The name dokhodyaga is derived from the verb dokhodit which means to arrive or to reach,' writes Petrov:
"At first I could not understand the connection, but it was explained to me: the dokhodyagas were ‘arrivistes', those who had arrived at socialism, were the finished type of citizen in the socialist society."
"It Happens In Russia," by VLADIMIR PETROV



"...had arrived at socialism, were the finished type of citizen in the socialist society."

But you totalitarians will still try to alter human nature.....no matter how many have to be killed in the effort.
 
Last edited:
And PC's OP flutters and sputters.
'twas ever thus for PoliSpice threads :boohoo:
She runs away, as always.
You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem." Now, since you can't back it up, you're attempting to ignore it. Do folks in your real life recognize what a fraud you are, too?
Common knowledge, sis. You write nonsense. Yes, you admit you are a fraud.


You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem."

Still waiting.


Actually....no waiting is involved. It is clear that you have no ability to 'pick any argument apart,' and have been revealed as a low-life lying sleaze so often that it has no effect.

When I think of all the people I respect the most, you're right there,... serving them drinks.
 
And PC's OP flutters and sputters.
'twas ever thus for PoliSpice threads :boohoo:
She runs away, as always.
You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem." Now, since you can't back it up, you're attempting to ignore it. Do folks in your real life recognize what a fraud you are, too?
Common knowledge, sis. You write nonsense. Yes, you admit you are a fraud.


You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem."

Still waiting.


Actually....no waiting is involved. It is clear that you have no ability to 'pick any argument apart,' and have been revealed as a low-life lying sleaze so often that it has no effect.

When I think of all the people I respect the most, you're right there,... serving them drinks.
It is quite clear as common knowledge.

That is you serving the drinks.
 
'twas ever thus for PoliSpice threads :boohoo:
She runs away, as always.
You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem." Now, since you can't back it up, you're attempting to ignore it. Do folks in your real life recognize what a fraud you are, too?
Common knowledge, sis. You write nonsense. Yes, you admit you are a fraud.


You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem."

Still waiting.


Actually....no waiting is involved. It is clear that you have no ability to 'pick any argument apart,' and have been revealed as a low-life lying sleaze so often that it has no effect.

When I think of all the people I respect the most, you're right there,... serving them drinks.
It is quite clear as common knowledge.

That is you serving the drinks.



You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem."

You lied again, huh?
 
She runs away, as always.
You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem." Now, since you can't back it up, you're attempting to ignore it. Do folks in your real life recognize what a fraud you are, too?
Common knowledge, sis. You write nonsense. Yes, you admit you are a fraud.


You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem."

Still waiting.


Actually....no waiting is involved. It is clear that you have no ability to 'pick any argument apart,' and have been revealed as a low-life lying sleaze so often that it has no effect.

When I think of all the people I respect the most, you're right there,... serving them drinks.
It is quite clear as common knowledge.

That is you serving the drinks.



You wrote "....scores of millions of Americans who can read the above, laugh, and pick it apart without any problem."

You lied again, huh?
Only if the American public education systems has failed, and it hasn't.
 

Peter Singer: This was the man, the view, that Barack Obama felt was the best choice as his 'science adviser.'



7. "In a 1995 article in the LondonSpectatorentitled"Killing Babies Isn't Always Wrong," Singer said "That day had to come," states Singer, "when Copernicus proved that the earth is not at the center of the universe. It is ridiculous to pretend that the old ethics make sense when plainly they do not.The notion that human life is sacred just because it's human is medieval."
Peter Singer Joins Obama s Health Care Administrators I Am Not a Fan of Peter Singer Story Experience

a. ""In the animal kingdom, after all, parents sometimes kill and even devour their offpsring". Singer argues that the West can learn from the other cultures like the Kalahari where children are routinely killed when they are unwanted,even when they are several years old.

.... Peter Singer was appointed by Obama as part of his Health Care Team..."
Ibid.


This is the view selected by Barack Obama as his representative in his administration

Your President...a man who has stated that his daughter, having a baby, would be a "punishment.". Obama Says He Doesn t Want His Daughters Punished with a Baby




"It is ridiculous to pretend that the old ethics make sense when plainly they do not.The notion that human life is sacred just because it's human is medieval."
Peter Singer, Obama's choice!

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

Where is the difference between the two quotes????




Did you vote for Obama? Well, then.... Such are the 'Views You've Been Trained To Accept.'
 
Your point? That atheists should not be in America? Tough. America is for everyone, even you.
 
Your point? That atheists should not be in America? Tough. America is for everyone, even you.


No, you moron....that murderers should not be in high office, or even in America. I'd certainly allow fools like you....for comic relief.
You already have that gig. You make the silliest assertions, then stamp your little feet, pout, and say we should accept your nonsense. Won't ever happen.
 
Wrong forum.



You imbecile....this is the exactly correct forum in which to reveal the disregard Liberals/Progressives/Democrats have for human life. And that disregard is based on a hatred of religion.


8. " A German politician explained why he was so popular: “Peter Singer's ideas are logical, free from religion and easy to understand”.

However, these encomiums were lost on a gathering outside where about 250 people had assembled to protest the invitation. Their message was that Singer believes in killing babies.

...a Swiss newspaper published an interview with Singer in which, under aggressive questioning, he expressed his views with characteristic frankness.

Neue Zuricher Zeitung: You do not consider an infant to be more worthy of protection than an embryo. On the other hand, you do not necessarily ascribe a higher status to humans than to animals.

Peter Singer: Belonging to the human species is not what makes it morally wrong to kill a living being. Why should all members of the species homo sapiens have a right to life, whereas other species do not? This idea is merely a remnant of our religious legacy. For centuries, we have been told that man was created in the image of God, that God granted us dominion over the animals and that we have an immortal soul.

NZZ: Would you go as far as to torture a baby if this were to bring about permanent happiness for the whole of mankind?

PS: This question is from Dostoevsky's "The brothers Karamazov"; Ivan poses it to his brother Alyosha. I may not be capable of doing it, as it is in my evolutionarily developed nature to protect children from harm. But it would be the right thing to do. Because if I didn't, thousands of children would be tortured in the future.
BioEdge Peter Singer disinvited from German philosophy festival





Every totalitarian.....communist, socialist, Progressive, Liberal, fascist....
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky
 

Forum List

Back
Top