The Vaccine Hoax is over.

Of course, the story is a bit different than your small quote would make it sound. Let's look at an expanded quote from the article, shall we?

"Neither TDap nor the child version of the vaccine, DTaP, is foolproof. A majority of the 522 cases are in vaccinated children, Kelso said, adding that the effectiveness fades as years pass. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, DTaP vaccines are 80 percent to 90 percent effective, and "about seven of 10 kids are fully protected five years after getting their last dose." Children typically receive five doses of DTaP between the age of 2 months and 6 years.

The highest incidence in Vermont is in the 10-to-14-year-old age group, Kelso said.

As for the adult vaccine, the CDC website states: "Our current estimate is that Tdap vaccination protects 7 of 10 people who receive it."

Vaccinated people who come down with the disease tend have less severe cases, Kelso said."

Oh shit, it works............

grasping for straws "majority of the 522 cases are in vaccinated children'

Did you not see that the most incidences were in the 10-14 year old range? That apparently means the full effects of the vaccine may have lessened or even worn off if it was administered in early childhood.

It sounds like the issue is not whether the vaccine works, but how effective it is for how long.

You seem to be implying that this specific vaccination, and vaccinations in general, are ineffective.
 
Neither TDap nor the child version of the vaccine, DTaP, is foolproof. A majority of the 522 cases are in vaccinated children

Neither TDap nor the child version of the vaccine, DTaP, is foolproof. A majority of the 522 cases are in vaccinated children, Kelso said, adding that the effectiveness fades as years pass. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, DTaP vaccines are 80 percent to 90 percent effective, and "about seven of 10 kids are fully protected five years after getting their last dose." Children typically receive five doses of DTaP between the age of 2 months and 6 years.

The highest incidence in Vermont is in the 10-to-14-year-old age group, Kelso said.

As for the adult vaccine, the CDC website states: "Our current estimate is that Tdap vaccination protects 7 of 10 people who receive it."

Vaccinated people who come down with the disease tend have less severe cases, Kelso said."

Hah thats pretty funny, busted him attempting the misleading partial quote technique.

Eots has no shame, as many times as he's been made to look like a complete ass in this thread he just keeps popping back up asking for more.
 
Neither TDap nor the child version of the vaccine, DTaP, is foolproof. A majority of the 522 cases are in vaccinated children

Neither TDap nor the child version of the vaccine, DTaP, is foolproof. A majority of the 522 cases are in vaccinated children, Kelso said, adding that the effectiveness fades as years pass. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, DTaP vaccines are 80 percent to 90 percent effective, and "about seven of 10 kids are fully protected five years after getting their last dose." Children typically receive five doses of DTaP between the age of 2 months and 6 years.

The highest incidence in Vermont is in the 10-to-14-year-old age group, Kelso said.

As for the adult vaccine, the CDC website states: "Our current estimate is that Tdap vaccination protects 7 of 10 people who receive it."

Vaccinated people who come down with the disease tend have less severe cases, Kelso said."

Hah thats pretty funny, busted him attempting the misleading partial quote technique.

Eots has no shame, as many times as he's been made to look like a complete ass in this thread he just keeps popping back up asking for more.

iI posted it it with the link and the only thing misleading is someone called Kelso.. there is nothing offered to support any of his speculations and they certainly can not be considered as facts
 
Last edited:
Oh shit, it works............

grasping for straws "majority of the 522 cases are in vaccinated children'

Did you not see that the most incidences were in the 10-14 year old range? That apparently means the full effects of the vaccine may have lessened or even worn off if it was administered in early childhood.

It sounds like the issue is not whether the vaccine works, but how effective it is for how long.

You seem to be implying that this specific vaccination, and vaccinations in general, are ineffective.

there is no question that some vaccines are ineffective or dangerouse but still heavily marketed
 
grasping for straws "majority of the 522 cases are in vaccinated children'

Did you not see that the most incidences were in the 10-14 year old range? That apparently means the full effects of the vaccine may have lessened or even worn off if it was administered in early childhood.

It sounds like the issue is not whether the vaccine works, but how effective it is for how long.

You seem to be implying that this specific vaccination, and vaccinations in general, are ineffective.

there is no question that some vaccines are ineffective or dangerouse but still heavily marketed

That much sounds quite possible. The question of which ones are ineffective or dangerous is important, however, and your posts seem to imply that they ALL are.
 
Did you not see that the most incidences were in the 10-14 year old range? That apparently means the full effects of the vaccine may have lessened or even worn off if it was administered in early childhood.

It sounds like the issue is not whether the vaccine works, but how effective it is for how long.

You seem to be implying that this specific vaccination, and vaccinations in general, are ineffective.

there is no question that some vaccines are ineffective or dangerouse but still heavily marketed

That much sounds quite possible. The question of which ones are ineffective or dangerous is important, however, and your posts seem to imply that they ALL are.

"Dr Maurice Hilleman: and I think that vaccines have to be considered the bargain basement technology for the 20th century."
 
A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

Q: Which is?

A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.

The Alternative-Doctor - Sixteen Reasons to Question Vaccinations
 

Forum List

Back
Top