*The Useless Removal Of Fire Arms*

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. Not having guns isn't going to change anything, if crazy killers can't get a gun, they will get a knife, a sword, a baseball bat, a bomb, a brick.
2. You can't stop crazy or mentally insane killers, face it, any one of your neighbors can decide to knock on you door and get close enough to you and kill you, when you are off guard, using a garden rake, or a water hose.
3. Cain killed Able without a *gun*.
4. If you are really serious about getting rid of murdering and killing and want *all* useless killings to stop, the only way it seems that that can be accomplished is to get rid of *all* people.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[slackjawed]

water hoses are dangerous, we should ban all water hoses over 1/2" in diameter and limit their length to 32'.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. When you're right you're right!
2. No debate needed.
3. Glad you *all* are smart enough to see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[zeke]

WOW you fuking people are weird. Are you trying to be cute? Obtuse? What is it you are trying to say in such a weird way? Surely there is a point to this thread? What might it be?

 

[zeke]

What's really funny. People used to kill each other with bare hands. Then rocks. Then clubs, then they made metal and found that metal blades worked well for killing, then the Chinese gave us gunpowder and we found exposive charges with a projectile to be very efficient killing methods. Then they increased the efficiency of killing with gunpowder by designing better weapons and ammo.

Have you noticed that the armies of the world have not gone back to killing with rocks and clubs as their main choice of weapons?
Just curious if you noticed that?

So while you are able to kill with a variety of weapons, most killers are lazy and take the easy, more efficient way; guns. But you knew that. Didn't you?

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that

What's really funny. People used to kill each other with bare hands. Then rocks. Then clubs, then they made metal and found that metal blades worked well for killing, then the Chinese gave us gunpowder and we found exposive charges with a projectile to be very efficient killing methods. Then they increased the efficiency of killing with gunpowder by designing better weapons and ammo.

Have you noticed that the armies of the world have not gone back to killing with rocks and clubs as their main choice of weapons?
Just curious if you noticed that?

So while you are able to kill with a variety of weapons, most killers are lazy and take the easy, more efficient way; guns. But you knew that. Didn't you?

1. Stop being Obtuse.
2. So you say the world is too lazy to revert back to swords and large stones if guns are removed from the face of the earth?
3. Maybe spears might be useful then?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Oldguy]

Sorry bout that,


1. Not having guns isn't going to change anything, if crazy killers can't get a gun, they will get a knife, a sword, a baseball bat, a bomb, a brick.
2. You can't stop crazy or mentally insane killers, face it, any one of your neighbors can decide to knock on you door and get close enough to you and kill you, when you are off guard, using a garden rake, or a water hose.
3. Cain killed Able without a *gun*.
4. If you are really serious about getting rid of murdering and killing and want *all* useless killings to stop, the only way it seems that that can be accomplished is to get rid of *all* people.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Who's suggesting we get rid of guns entirely? Nobody is seriously proposing that, not even Obama.

The only ones talking about THAT are the hyper-excited Obamaphobes.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

WOW you fuking people are weird. Are you trying to be cute? Obtuse? What is it you are trying to say in such a weird way? Surely there is a point to this thread? What might it be?

1. Glad you have perfect understanding in this matter.
2. Now what is this understanding you have, we do not?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,


1. Not having guns isn't going to change anything, if crazy killers can't get a gun, they will get a knife, a sword, a baseball bat, a bomb, a brick.
2. You can't stop crazy or mentally insane killers, face it, any one of your neighbors can decide to knock on you door and get close enough to you and kill you, when you are off guard, using a garden rake, or a water hose.
3. Cain killed Able without a *gun*.
4. If you are really serious about getting rid of murdering and killing and want *all* useless killings to stop, the only way it seems that that can be accomplished is to get rid of *all* people.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Who's suggesting we get rid of guns entirely? Nobody is seriously proposing that, not even Obama.

The only ones talking about THAT are the hyper-excited Obamaphobes.

1. So does anyone here or anywhere who reads this think that removing certain types of guns from the market place, or doing more expensive back ground checks, or mental tests will in any way prevent *one* pointless murder?
2. I say murder's will continue un-abated, logically.
3. Only thing making certain guns unavailable will do in hindering mass murders is *nothing*.
4. Save the money and do something else.
5. What else can be done about it you may ask?
6. Just axe me and I will tell you.
7. God you people are obtuse.....lol!


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[BallsBrunswick]

Seriously, what is this "Sorry bout that" thing about?

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

Seriously, what is this "Sorry bout that" thing about?

1. To some it will remain a mystery.
2. Its been gone over.
3. To *death*.
4. But do elaborate of what needs be done if anything about mass murderers???



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. I will give you a clue, look to the *mother*.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas