The USA is going to war again.

What's the point. Ghadafi has already slaughtered his citizens and is now in control again.

Exactly, if we wanted to effect the out come, we should have acted 2 weeks ago. However BHO was to busy golfing and picking March madness brackets to be bothered to even talk about it until now.

Now that the Rebels are defeated he is paying lip service to the Idea of acting, when he never intended to do anything in the first place.

This presidents serious lack of leadership Experience is become more and more painfully evident.
520.gif
544.gif
520.gif


Another
CLUELESS-'BAGGER!!!!

493.gif
493.gif
493.gif
 
We just can't mind our own business. This isn't surprising to me. Both the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons love that World's Policeman/World's Referee stuff. That's why i always say they're the same entity in the end. It's all just a big dirty trick they continue to play on us. They love to pretend they're so different but in the end they both really do agree on much more than they disagree on. I just wish we had a real alternative. We have no business bombing and killing anyone in Libya. Period,end of story.

BULL FUCKING SHIT

CRAP TASTIC LIE OF THE YEAR (so far)

YOU RETARDO!


That's what sprung to mind as I read this. Why? Because it couldnt be farther from the truth. It's been liberals who have SCREAMED for us to stop nation-building....get out of other countries' business...and COME HOME.

Do you even read what you type or do you go into some drunken coma the moment your fingers hit the keyboard?

Liberals wanted us to STOP this shit. And now here you are claiming the opposite.
 
We just can't mind our own business. This isn't surprising to me. Both the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons love that World's Policeman/World's Referee stuff. That's why i always say they're the same entity in the end. It's all just a big dirty trick they continue to play on us. They love to pretend they're so different but in the end they both really do agree on much more than they disagree on. I just wish we had a real alternative. We have no business bombing and killing anyone in Libya. Period,end of story.

BULL FUCKING SHIT

CRAP TASTIC LIE OF THE YEAR (so far)

YOU RETARDO!


That's what sprung to mind as I read this. Why? Because it couldnt be farther from the truth. It's been liberals who have SCREAMED for us to stop nation-building....get out of other countries' business...and COME HOME.

Do you even read what you type or do you go into some drunken coma the moment your fingers hit the keyboard?

Liberals wanted us to STOP this shit. And now here you are claiming the opposite.

lol! Say Whaa?? "Liberal" Democrats have always supported aggressive Foreign Interventionism and Nation-Building. No offense,but you sound like you were born yesterday. You probably have a lot of growing up to do so i'll excuse your over-zealous ignorance. Socialists/Progressives & Neocons love being the 'World's Policeman/World's Referee.' I just wish we could have a real alternative to both.
 
WASHINGTON (AP) - Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Thursday that a U.N. no-fly zone over Libya would require bombing targets inside the country, and a deputy acknowledged that Moammar Gadhafi's forces were making huge gains against the opposition.

Clinton gave her assessment during a visit to Tunisia and ahead of a planned U.N. vote, making clear the risk of possible military intervention as world powers considered broader steps to protect civilians and pressure the Libyan leader.

"A no-fly zone requires certain actions taken to protect the planes and the pilots, including bombing targets like the Libyan defense systems," Clinton said as she neared the end of a Middle East trip dominated by worries about Libya.

Both the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., and the top Republican, Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, expressed frustration with the administration and its articulation of policies.

Senators were in disagreement over the no-fly zone. Lugar doubted that U.S. interests would be served and said the step would require a declaration of war from Congress under the War Powers Act. He asked that Arab governments pay for any U.S. military involvement.

My Way News - Clinton: No-fly zone means bombing Libyan targets

Another war for liberal/ progressives/ centrists/ communist to protest. Liberals will send more of our young men, and women into harms way then turn against then, and not support them when they get there. Doesn't everyone feel safer now?

Dont worry, the Democrat party will be there to point fingers at the error of our ways if we do.
....More-often-referred-to as....

PRECEDENCE!!



:eusa_whistle:


Howdy, I thought that you might enjoy watching this clip. It may explain some of the intelligence glitches concerning Iraq's WMDs. This is a great video.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's the point. Ghadafi has already slaughtered his citizens and is now in control again.

Exactly, if we wanted to effect the out come, we should have acted 2 weeks ago. However BHO was to busy golfing and picking March madness brackets to be bothered to even talk about it until now.

Now that the Rebels are defeated he is paying lip service to the Idea of acting, when he never intended to do anything in the first place.

This presidents serious lack of leadership Experience is become more and more painfully evident.
520.gif
544.gif
520.gif


Another
CLUELESS-'BAGGER!!!!

493.gif
493.gif
493.gif

Looks like Mr. Shaman got into the medicine cabinet again. :lol: What a fucking tweaker! ~BH
 
Hey here's an idea...Lets not bomb & kill anyone in Libya. I know it's a crazy idea but lets give it a shot anyway.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top