The Unseen Hand

[Preacher]

Dale Smith you read it? I was at a bookstore coming through the smokies on Sunday and this bookstore was open and he had a copy for 8$ so I bought it. The owner said he doesn't reach much but recommended that book. It shows WHO starts wars and WHY they do it. VERY interesting from what I scanned....moving in 2 days so will get around to reading it eventually.Seemed up your ally though. 9/11 inside job you as well.

 

[Dale Smith]

Yep and it's pretty much "dead on".........you will end up reading it several times.

 

[daws101]

 

[LA RAM FAN]

No I have not read it but I have HEARD about that book before and remember hearing what it was about.Meant to check it out but never got around to it,will have to do so sometime with this reminder from you. It is obviously the truth the fact that government shill disinfo agent dawgshits handlers sent him here to troll this thread is proof positive it is factual.lol

 

[Dale Smith]

No I have not read it but I have HEARD about that book before and remember hearing what it was about.Meant to check it out but never got around to it,will have to do so sometime with this reminder from you. It is obviously the truth the fact that government shill disinfo agent dawgshits handlers sent him here to troll this thread is proof positive it is factual.lol

Hmmm? I must have the troll on "Ignore" because I don't see anything from him here. Putting shills in iggyland has only enhanced my posting experience here.

 

[daws101]

The Unseen Hand: An Introduction to the Conspiratorial View of History

• Look inside

Goodreads 3.9/5
Amazon 4.4/5
Ralph Epperson contends that the major events of the past, the revolutions, the wars, the depressions and the revolutions, have been planned years in advance by an international conspiracy. He puts forward his Conspiratorial View of History.

• First published: Jan 01, 1985

 

[daws101]

Disclaimer:
This is written with many of the standard "boiler-plate" perspectives of nominal Christianity, so not only will there be terminology differences but also profound differences in observance, or the lack thereof. The primary value this book offers is the retelling of the activities of the RCC so that the current generation will be on guard, and not lulled into a comfort zone and caught by surprise. The tactics used by the RCC are planned decades, and even centuries, ahead of time. The conclusions of the author may diverge from ours on several details.

 

[midcan5]

"Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead." Franklin

"I want to argue for something which is controversial, although I believe that it is also intuitive and commonsensical. My claim is this: Oliver believes what he does because that is the kind of thinker he is or, to put it more bluntly, because there is something wrong with how he thinks. The problem with conspiracy theorists is not, as the US legal scholar Cass Sunstein argues, that they have little relevant information. The key to what they end up believing is how they interpret and respond to the vast quantities of relevant information at their disposal. I want to suggest that this is fundamentally a question of the way they are. Oliver isn’t mad (or at least, he needn’t be). Nevertheless, his beliefs about 9/11 are the result of the peculiarities of his intellectual constitution – in a word, of his intellectual character." The intellectual character of conspiracy theorists | Aeon Essays

Conspiracy theories are dangerous...
? Serious Conspiracy Theorist Question ?
JADE HELM MASTER THE HUMAN DOMAIN

 

[Dale Smith]

"Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead." Franklin

"I want to argue for something which is controversial, although I believe that it is also intuitive and commonsensical. My claim is this: Oliver believes what he does because that is the kind of thinker he is or, to put it more bluntly, because there is something wrong with how he thinks. The problem with conspiracy theorists is not, as the US legal scholar Cass Sunstein argues, that they have little relevant information. The key to what they end up believing is how they interpret and respond to the vast quantities of relevant information at their disposal. I want to suggest that this is fundamentally a question of the way they are. Oliver isn’t mad (or at least, he needn’t be). Nevertheless, his beliefs about 9/11 are the result of the peculiarities of his intellectual constitution – in a word, of his intellectual character." The intellectual character of conspiracy theorists | Aeon Essays

Conspiracy theories are dangerous...
? Serious Conspiracy Theorist Question ?
JADE HELM MASTER THE HUMAN DOMAIN

Someone hands me a 200 piece puzzle and tells me that it is the scene of a Hawaiian beach........after about 40 pieces in it is revealed that I can see a polar bear and a penguin with ice in the background, I can pretty much come to a conclusion that the one that handed me the puzzle was wrong. I have spent a lot of time attaining the knowledge that I have...for every one hour of digesting information, I spend another hour vetting it and approaching it from every angle possible. When you do this enough times, the big picture becomes very clear to me. I shook off cognitive dissonance a long time ago and it wasn't easy.

 

[daws101]

"Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead." Franklin

"I want to argue for something which is controversial, although I believe that it is also intuitive and commonsensical. My claim is this: Oliver believes what he does because that is the kind of thinker he is or, to put it more bluntly, because there is something wrong with how he thinks. The problem with conspiracy theorists is not, as the US legal scholar Cass Sunstein argues, that they have little relevant information. The key to what they end up believing is how they interpret and respond to the vast quantities of relevant information at their disposal. I want to suggest that this is fundamentally a question of the way they are. Oliver isn’t mad (or at least, he needn’t be). Nevertheless, his beliefs about 9/11 are the result of the peculiarities of his intellectual constitution – in a word, of his intellectual character." The intellectual character of conspiracy theorists | Aeon Essays

Conspiracy theories are dangerous...
? Serious Conspiracy Theorist Question ?
JADE HELM MASTER THE HUMAN DOMAIN

Someone hands me a 200 piece puzzle and tells me that it is the scene of a Hawaiian beach........after about 40 pieces in it is revealed that I can see a polar bear and a penguin with ice in the background, I can pretty much come to a conclusion that the one that handed me the puzzle was wrong. I have spent a lot of time attaining the knowledge that I have...for every one hour of digesting information, I spend another hour vetting it and approaching it from every angle possible. When you do this enough times, the big picture becomes very clear to me. I shook off cognitive dissonance a long time ago and it wasn't easy.

and traded it for cognitive bias.

Cognitive bias
A cognitive bias refers to a systematic pattern of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment, whereby inferences about other people and situations may be drawn in an illogical fashion. Individuals create their own "subjective social reality" from their perception of the input.

is it just me or is that a spot on description of dale and his merry band of the brain dead?

 

[Preacher]

I must have the troll on ignore as well I don't see any thing

 

[daws101]

I must have the troll on ignore as well I don't see any thing

You must be a slow reader.

 

[Moonglow]

Two peas in a pod-ah..

 

[daws101]

Two peas in a pod-ah..

The book was published in 1985 and these shit heads are just now reading it or hearing about it.
I read it in 86 wonder if it's gotten any more ridiculous.

 

[Moonglow]

Two peas in a pod-ah..

The book was published in 1985 and these shit heads are just now reading it or hearing about it.
I read it in 86 wonder if it's go any more ridiculous.

They just bought the book Chariots of the Gods...Now they wait outside to see if any aliens will respond to their flashlight signals in morse code..

 

[daws101]

Two peas in a pod-ah..

The book was published in 1985 and these shit heads are just now reading it or hearing about it.
I read it in 86 wonder if it's go any more ridiculous.

They just bought the book Chariots of the Gods...Now they wait outside to see if any aliens will respond to their flashlight signals in morse code..

I'm sure they really huge fans of ancient aliens and other shows like that .

Is there any such thing as conspiracy porn?
If there is they probably have it.
If there isn't, they'll say it's a cover up.

 

[Dale Smith]

Two peas in a pod-ah..

The book was published in 1985 and these shit heads are just now reading it or hearing about it.
I read it in 86 wonder if it's go any more ridiculous.

They just a book Chariots of the Gods...Now they wait outside to see if any aliens will respond to their flashlight signals in morse code..

Try English next time.........you made no sense. I never read the book until 4 years ago because I was like you....one of the sheeple that believed my beloved "gubermint" was a legitimate governmental body because that is what the "gubermint" school system taught me. I might still be asleep had it not been for a watershed moment that made me stop and reconsider. Four years later along with the many books I have read by downloading them on line, the thousand or so documentaries, thousand or so lectures I have listened.... to to go with another few thousand hours of researching on the internet to vet the information has brought me to where I am. I will go toe to toe with you on any issue concerning where we are now, where we have been and where we are heading..... and we can let the masses decide which one knows his stuff....just let me know. I am a walking, talking encyclopedia of knowledge and I digest more information with each passing day. I would be happy to add your pelt to the wall of the others that have tucked tail and ran....you have nothing to lose other than your pride. Game on???

 

[daws101]

Two peas in a pod-ah..

The book was published in 1985 and these shit heads are just now reading it or hearing about it.
I read it in 86 wonder if it's go any more ridiculous.

They just a book Chariots of the Gods...Now they wait outside to see if any aliens will respond to their flashlight signals in morse code..

Try English next time.........you made no sense. I never read the book until 4 years ago because I was like you....one of the sheeple that believed my beloved "gubermint" was a legitimate governmental body because that is what the "gubermint" school system taught me. I might still be asleep had it not been for a watershed moment that made me stop and reconsider. Four years later along with the many books I have read by downloading them on line, the thousand or so documentaries, thousand or so lectures I have listened.... to to go with another few thousand hours of researching on the internet to vet the information has brought me to where I am. I will go toe to toe with you on any issue concerning where we are now, where we have been and where we are heading..... and we can let the masses decide which one knows his stuff....just let me know. I am a walking, talking encyclopedia of knowledge and I digest more information with each passing day. I would be happy to add your pelt to the wall of the others that have tucked tail and ran....you have nothing to lose other than your pride. Game on???

Is it possible for you whine with brevity?
You the only thing you've beaten is your dick.

 

[anotherlife]

Engels and Lenin said, beware of the military industrial complex.