The U.S. turning Communist polls better than Congress!

Low ratings for the Republicans happen because they are pursuing an agenda that benefits the 1% against the 99%.

Low ratings for the Democrats happen for exactly the same reason.

There are no low ratings for liberal approaches to the economy. The Democrats suffer in the polls because they do not pursue these approaches.
As Bill Maher said: "He's been president for almost 3 years - when do we get to try some Democratic policies?"
 
Don't wanna talk about the 13% under Pelosi? I didn't think so. :eusa_whistle:
Ummm....it doesn't say only the Democrats, or only the House, or only under Pelosi. The Senate is not under Pelosi.


And I would strongly suspect, since that 13% was in December 2010, that it was a backlash against TARP. And I would strongly believe that you would agree, if you're honest about it. EVERYONE was pissed about TARP.


Your choice in signature lines is telling -I'm one of those people who actually takes a look at those because it is very revealing about the individual's critical thinking skills and his ability (or lack thereof) to engage in discussions of substance or whether they are just another apologist demagogue. What do you really think your signature lines say about you?

You quote that heavy "thinker" Maher about why people think Gingrich is intelligent -as if his obviously partisan comment really IS the reason people have started to increase their support for Gingrich and why they insist the man is intelligent? Are you kidding? That actually works for you, huh? Because in case you really didn't know this, Maher's comment isn't funny, isn't biting political humor and in fact it is just a sad commentary about Maher's own lack of critical thinking skills too -so you must think it represents "truth" on some level. Oh wow Bill Maher said it so that makes it real to you or what? If that were actually true and based on some grain of truth and fact oh-you-too-are-another-real-"genius"-here - then Gingrich would not have had to spend these 9 or 10 debates getting his poll numbers up from the basement, would he? A lot of people rejected Gingrich out of hand right off the bat before he even opened his mouth, based on what they presumed they knew about him -and it has taken a long time to get people to re-evaluate their opinion of the man. So maybe it was for more than just using a couple of words. Or what is more likely when it comes to Maher -what Gingrich had to say couldn't be wrapped up in a 10 second sound bite and that meant it went right over Maher's head entirely. Gee, maybe people re-evaluated their opinion of Gingrich for reasons beyond Maher's ability to grasp. Reasons that are actually far more serious and deep than the non-existent evaluation voters gave Obama whose sole accomplishment before he was allowed to use the office of President as an entry level job -was ZILCH. Oh, yeah I forgot. He can read off that teleprompter like nobody's business, can't he. That kind of superficial skill is always top priority for a liberal. And let's not pretend the man had any other accomplishment to his name than this skill, ok?

Then you put a link to a comment from someone you must have ongoing issues with as if the fact she left words out of the sentence indicates something about her intelligence when in fact it is something everyone has done when they can't type as fast as they are thinking. I'm not defending anything that was said by her because I don't care enough to check out the what led to any squabble between you two -just pointing out that what you want to pretend is being "clever" -isn't nearly by half. It tells me you are petty and mean-spirited and that you cannot engage in a spirited debate or tolerate vigorous disagreement without taking it as a PERSONAL attack -and then respond by not just attacking the other person, but perpetuating it beyond the discussion at hand and continue personally attacking that person every time you post. And clearly are shallow enough to believe that represents something both intelligent and deep when in reality it only reveals the depth of some really unpleasant character traits you possess. See I don't give a flying fuck if you like or dislike me, I don't care if you agree with me or not and if you can't intelligent and rationally defend your opinions and can only engage in sound bites as if that represents "substance", then it is a waste of my time engaging in debate with someone like you.

I have no problem if people disagree with me -but I expect them to rely on substance and show a mature level of critical thinking skills which tends to be in very short supply among liberals and not spew back stupid sound bites as if that represents "wisdom". I have a bad habit of getting really insulting toward those who like to pretend demagoguery, spewing back political talking points from their handlers and silly sound bites represents "intelligent discussion". Your own signature lines told me all I needed to know about whether your posts are even worth reading at all -which is why I didn't bother to address a thing you said in even one of them.

You want to encourage others to think in superficial and empty sound bites rather than substance just because that is the best you can do? Misery not only loves company but so does the total lack of critical thinking skills, huh. Sorry, seek that company elsewhere -it is no big loss for either of us, huh. LOL

But I will point out the obvious here -because if you can't grasp it, others can. The overwhelming vast majority of Americans disapprove of the job Congress is doing -Congress isn't viewed as being "Republican" or "Democrat" but as GOVERNMENT. Those who think this portends something favorable for one party over the other, particularly favoring Democrats over Republicans when they control half of Congress and the Presidency and are therefore the bulk of power in government -are mistaken.

I am among that overwhelming majority who strongly disapprove of the job Congress is doing and I am a conservative. I STRONGLY disapprove of the job Congress is doing -not sort of disapprove, but STRONGLY disapprove. I will continue to STRONGLY disapprove of the job Congress is doing until the members of Congress get it through their heads they are not little dictators sent to Washington to ram unwanted laws down our throats against our will. Until they get it through their heads they were NOT sent there to spend our nation into bankruptcy and then try to figure out how to part us from ever more of our own hard earned money so they can keep up the out of control spending spree -and until they get it through their heads that simply getting elected did NOT turn them into experts who can suddenly do everything better than those who actually do it for a living. Politicians are on the same level as used car salesmen but without their finesse. Politicians are for the most part lawyers, a group that is massively over-represented in this country and whose real purpose is to fuck up everyone's life in order to justify their massive and useless numbers -lawyer politicians in particular are THE one group that has done more damage to this nation than any other while trying to deceive the rest of us that only lawyers can run government which is complete bullshit. If I could pass just one Constitutional amendment it would be to limit the number of lawyers that can serve in government at any given time.

So trying to read the tea leaves of any poll that merely shows the overwhelming vast majority of Americans disapprove of the job Congress is doing without bothering to find out exactly what it is they are disapproving -is going to result in a lot of wrong assumptions, isn't it?


Well, that's all very nice! You should probably put me on ignore. :lol:
 
You and SAT's messiah spent the time on healthcare that people didn't want.

As Syn said, the stimulus bill addressed the economy. Health care is a huge concern for the public.

Unsurprisingly, you fail to understand my post.

You're tickled at the amount of support for America turning Communist.

Nevertheless, it's no surprise that a Statist who wants to be a subject, not a citizen, calls criticism of government "bullshit".

That is an insane reading of his comments. You cannot be serious.
Thanks for your input. It was immediately discarded as worthless.


SAT - this should indicate to you that responding to this troll is worthless. He's really only worth the effort to laugh at.
 
As Syn said, the stimulus bill addressed the economy. Health care is a huge concern for the public.



That is an insane reading of his comments. You cannot be serious.
Thanks for your input. It was immediately discarded as worthless.


SAT - this should indicate to you that responding to this troll is worthless. He's really only worth the effort to laugh at.
"Troll"? There you go again, redefining words.

But then, if you didn't do that, you could never even pretend to win an argument. :lol:
 
There are no low ratings for liberal approaches to the economy. The Democrats suffer in the polls because they do not pursue these approaches.

Europe has, and Europe's in deep shit.
Not because of their social policies, which are what define them as Liberal or even quasi-Socialist.

What's paying for those social policies, genius?

Liberal economic policies. Well, they're paying for them for the moment. They're unsustainable.

Moron.
 
Thanks for your input. It was immediately discarded as worthless.


SAT - this should indicate to you that responding to this troll is worthless. He's really only worth the effort to laugh at.
"Troll"? There you go again, redefining words.

But then, if you didn't do that, you could never even pretend to win an argument. :lol:
SAT the newby is the troll. They're just coaching him on how to project his behaviors on the opposition, like the good little apparatchiks they are. :rolleyes:
 
SAT - this should indicate to you that responding to this troll is worthless. He's really only worth the effort to laugh at.
"Troll"? There you go again, redefining words.

But then, if you didn't do that, you could never even pretend to win an argument. :lol:
SAT the newby is the troll. They're just coaching him on how to project his behaviors on the opposition, like the good little apparatchiks they are. :rolleyes:
I've never seen anything original from SAT. He may well be a script. A simple one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top