The "TRUTH" about "Wealth Distribution".

Discussion in 'Economy' started by rdean, Dec 19, 2010.

  1. rdean
    Offline

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,111
    Thanks Received:
    6,895
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +14,965
    Americans Are Horribly Misinformed About Who Has Money

    [​IMG]

    The top row shows the actual distribution of wealth in America. The richest 20 percent, represented by that blue line, has about 85 percent of the wealth. The next richest 20 percent, represented by that red line, has about 10 percent of the wealth. And the remaining three-fifths of America shares a tiny sliver of the country's wealth.

    Below that, the "Estimated" rows show how different groups think wealth is distributed.

    --------------------------------------------------------------

    If people have no money, then the economy will NOT expand. It's just that simple. All the tax breaks in the world don't mean anything if you don't have a job.

    What are some suggestions on nation building. Not building Iraq or China, but "THIS" nation. The most important nation. Home.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,940
    Thanks Received:
    5,212
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,683
    Wealth Distribution/Redistribution = Code for Socialism/Communism.

    Taking 1/6th of the economy and placing it under government control (ObamaCare) won't help.

    Reduce the size and scope of government. Conservatives pay less taxes, Liberals get the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. It's a win/win situation.
     
  3. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    Wealth isn't distributed...It's earned and accumulated, despite gubmint's best efforts to expropriate as much of it as possible.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,235
    Thanks Received:
    14,914
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,018
    Yes, but what percent of scientists are Republicans?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Big Fitz
    Offline

    Big Fitz User Quit *****

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    16,917
    Thanks Received:
    2,473
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,475
    Hey Hairnet... you ducked out on my question in another thread, but since it is still appropriate here again I ask:

    At what point does a person's property stop being theirs and become the government's property? Or now in this framing YOUR property?

    What did you do to EARN someone elses property?

    Jason Lewis the other day put this example to better visual accuity. He pointed out that Government right now believes itself entitled to about 20% of the average wage earner's pay. So, does the government believe that 20% of your house is theirs? It must if 20% of your income is theirs. Which rooms would it take? Or what days does it get to open your house to the public?

    The absurdity that you don't own what you earn is palpable. (that means you can feel it, Hairnet.) The government has no ownership of your property. It takes what is not theirs to give to those who have not earned.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  6. hortysir
    Offline

    hortysir In Memorial of 47

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2010
    Messages:
    20,459
    Thanks Received:
    4,027
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Lakeland, FL
    Ratings:
    +6,296
    I think, these days, it's $250K
    :eusa_whistle:

    I'm not understanding the fascination with who has how much.
    Isn't wealth accumulation core to the "American Dream"?
     
  7. loosecannon
    Offline

    loosecannon Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,888
    Thanks Received:
    263
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +264
    earnings and accumulation are other forms of redistribution. That's a fact, Jack.
     
  8. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    Wrong, tovarich.

    Earned and accumulated wealth comes from volition in a free and decentralized marketplace.

    "Distribution" presumes a central point from which things are distributed, along with a central distributor....That's a fact of linguistics, jack.

    The further fact that envious and covetous control freaks like you long to be said central distributors, doesn't change the meanings of words.
     
  9. Samson
    Offline

    Samson Póg Mo Thóin Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,357
    Thanks Received:
    3,742
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    A Higher Plain
    Ratings:
    +4,210
    OK "other forms of redistribution."

    "Redistribution" based on competition between enterprises that drives up quality and drives down cost.
     
  10. Big Fitz
    Offline

    Big Fitz User Quit *****

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    16,917
    Thanks Received:
    2,473
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,475
    Economics is a form of DISTRIBUTION based on trade value which is the core of societal existence. Value for value and both parties gain. RE-DISTRIBUTION is not a value for value exchange. It is a gain/loss without intrinsic value but political motivation where one party is penalized for another party's gain. It is inherently unfair.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page