Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"New breakthroughs are actually increasing U.S. supplies. But homegrown oil isn't going to lower prices at the pump" ***
*** Cover Time Magazine April 9, 2012
Discuss.
What is there to discuss? You don't have a link, any facts or figures.
How's the weather in the Bay area today?
"New breakthroughs are actually increasing U.S. supplies. But homegrown oil isn't going to lower prices at the pump" ***
*** Cover Time Magazine April 9, 2012
Discuss.
"New breakthroughs are actually increasing U.S. supplies. But homegrown oil isn't going to lower prices at the pump" ***
*** Cover Time Magazine April 9, 2012
Discuss.
ANYBODY but Obama - asswipe
Increasing domestic oil production was never about lowering gasoline prices. I Agree. Seems the usual RWers on this board don't.
It's about decreasing imports, lowering the trade defecit, employing Americans, keeping our petro dollars within our own borders, increasing royalty and bonus revenues to the Treasury, contributing to the GDP, improving tax revenues to Federal State and Local entities, and boosting economic activity
What is there to discuss? You don't have a link, any facts or figures.
How's the weather in the Bay area today?
No link because I get Time in the mail and reading the article is not necessary in responding to the thread. Some won't read anyway, they have been convinced that drilling for oil and building the pipeline are the solutions to all of our energy needs.
[Today, we've had rain, wind, showers and now sun. Spring has sprung and this weekend the tomatoes go in as well as the herbs and onions, the citrus get pruned (lemon, lime, navel Orange and pommelo grapefruit) and the apricot, fig and nectarine get checked for bugs and sprayed if necessary.]
What is there to discuss? You don't have a link, any facts or figures.
How's the weather in the Bay area today?
No link because I get Time in the mail and reading the article is not necessary in responding to the thread. Some won't read anyway, they have been convinced that drilling for oil and building the pipeline are the solutions to all of our energy needs.
[Today, we've had rain, wind, showers and now sun. Spring has sprung and this weekend the tomatoes go in as well as the herbs and onions, the citrus get pruned (lemon, lime, navel Orange and pommelo grapefruit) and the apricot, fig and nectarine get checked for bugs and sprayed if necessary.]
I think the graphics suck.
I don't get the magazine, so that covers the entire response you are going to get from me re the cover.
While unconventional sources promise to keep the supply of oil flowing, it won't flow as easily as it did for most of the 20th century. The new supplies are for the most part more expensive than traditional oil from places like the Middle East, sometimes significantly so. They are often dirtier, with higher risks of accidents. The decline of major conventional oil fields and the rise in demand mean the spare production capacity that once cushioned prices could be gone, ushering in an era of volatile market swings. And burning all this leftover oil could lock the world into dangerous climate change. "I'm less concerned about the absolute disappearance of fossil fuels than about the environmental consequences of pursuing what's left," says Michael Klare, an energy expert and the author of The Race for What's Left. There will be oil, but it will be expensive, dirty and dangerous.
No link because I get Time in the mail and reading the article is not necessary in responding to the thread. Some won't read anyway, they have been convinced that drilling for oil and building the pipeline are the solutions to all of our energy needs.
[Today, we've had rain, wind, showers and now sun. Spring has sprung and this weekend the tomatoes go in as well as the herbs and onions, the citrus get pruned (lemon, lime, navel Orange and pommelo grapefruit) and the apricot, fig and nectarine get checked for bugs and sprayed if necessary.]
I think the graphics suck.
I don't get the magazine, so that covers the entire response you are going to get from me re the cover.
And I suppose you believe the Keystone Pipeline and Drill Baby Drill combined are the panacea for our energy issues, so reading this article isn't necessary and avoiding cognitive dissonance is a priority. Correct?
From page one: "The future of oil. Extreme Oil - from the deep Atlantic to the Arctic, from Fracking in the U.S. to Sand in Canada - is replacing dwindling supplies. But it comes at a heavy economic and environmental cost"
by Bryan Walsh
Now Whitey, we have increased production, and what have we seen? Higher prices is what we have seen. And will continue to see. High demand for a increasing dwindling supply. The easy oil is nearly gone, what we get now is going to cost in dollars and environmental damage.
Now Whitey, we have increased production, and what have we seen? Higher prices is what we have seen. And will continue to see. High demand for a increasing dwindling supply. The easy oil is nearly gone, what we get now is going to cost in dollars and environmental damage.
Guess what else we have?
Increased demand, higher taxes, and more regulation.
Now Whitey, we have increased production, and what have we seen? Higher prices is what we have seen. And will continue to see. High demand for a increasing dwindling supply. The easy oil is nearly gone, what we get now is going to cost in dollars and environmental damage.
Guess what else we have?
Increased demand, higher taxes, and more regulation.
I sugget you go to a library, or buy a copy of Time and read the article. I'll be happy to read the source where you learned, "Increased demand, higher taxes, and more regulation" is the reality.
Now Whitey, we have increased production, and what have we seen? Higher prices is what we have seen. And will continue to see. High demand for a increasing dwindling supply. The easy oil is nearly gone, what we get now is going to cost in dollars and environmental damage.
Guess what else we have?
Increased demand, higher taxes, and more regulation.
I sugget you go to a library, or buy a copy of Time and read the article. I'll be happy to read the source where you learned, "Increased demand, higher taxes, and more regulation" is the reality.
