The third building which collapsed on 9/11 was not hit by a plane

[LA RAM FAN]

three farts on this page from dawgshit.

 

[daws101]

but being the scumbag disnfo agent you are you constantly post links to debwunkers sites that still cite diesel fuel and building damage as explanations for the collapse...why would you do that ?

take two ....the so called idiots are telling the whole story,, if eots knew how to read he'd know that..
diesel fuel was a reasonable candidate in the early stages of the investigation.
as more and better data came in it was ruled out.
it's called an update.
little facts like that have never stopped eots from being willfully ignorant.

but the real question is why agent daws continually and knowingly links to sites that still perpetuate these inaccuracies

because.... shit for brains, the inaccuracies are a major part of the warts and all story or the facts....if you knew how to read you'd know that.

 

[eots]

and according to NIST outside of igniting the fires this damage played no role in the collapse or compromise the of the structural integrity of wtc 7 and that fire causing the loss of column 79 was the cause of the collapse and the loss of this single column under any circumstances would have resulted in a complete collapse of wtc 7

 

[eots]

take two ....the so called idiots are telling the whole story,, if eots knew how to read he'd know that..
diesel fuel was a reasonable candidate in the early stages of the investigation.
as more and better data came in it was ruled out.
it's called an update.
little facts like that have never stopped eots from being willfully ignorant.

but the real question is why agent daws continually and knowingly links to sites that still perpetuate these inaccuracies

because.... shit for brains, the inaccuracies are a major part of the warts and all story or the facts....if you knew how to read you'd know that.

any responsible site would correct its mistakes after to final report came out

 

[LA RAM FAN]

» The Third Building Which Collapsed on 9/11 Was Not Hit By a Plane Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Yeah! A UFO hit it!

Take your truther crap somewhere else!

thanks for proving the truth hurts you and your afraid of it.


Those Truthers never give it up.

There are still idiots who think we never went to the moon.

Crazy is always crazy.

yeah and thats what you are is crazy.you need to look in the mirror when calling someone an idiot.You cant get around the fact that there were other buildings damaged far more extensively than bld 7 and had more severe fires yet they did not collapse and that the only three buildings that did collapse that day were owned by Silverstein.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

so having the debris of two other buildings collapse into it isnt going to cause any damage?

read above post.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

NIST determined damage from falling debris was not a factor in the collapse of wtc 7 and that and fires caused an "extraordinary event". Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the entire building down

NIST determined That the loss of WTC 7’s Column 79—the structural component identified as the one whose failure on 9/11 started the progressive collapse and would still have led to a complete loss of the building if fire or damage from the falling debris of the nearby WTC 1 tower were not factors. The investigation team concluded that the column’s failure under any circumstance would have initiated the destructive sequence of events.

odd the eot's quotes a series of documents he thinks are bullshit or part of the disinformation cover up

He ignores the pertinent parts, like why the fire raged for 8 hours and how the fire department never tried to put it out. You see those parts make his claims look as stupid as they are.

and YOU ignore the fact that other buildings that were much closer to the towers which had far more extensive fires than bld 7 and had far mor extensive damage that day did not collapse and that the towers and bld 7 were all owned by Silverstein and none of the other buildings which did not collapse that day were not owned by him.you coincidence theorists logic is hysterical.

 

[daws101]

but the real question is why agent daws continually and knowingly links to sites that still perpetuate these inaccuracies

because.... shit for brains, the inaccuracies are a major part of the warts and all story or the facts....if you knew how to read you'd know that.

any responsible site would correct its mistakes after to final report came out

what part of telling the whole story do you not understand.....
also what you chose to call mistakes have been updated and are current.
BTW your whole pov on 911 is inacurate...

 

[daws101]

odd the eot's quotes a series of documents he thinks are bullshit or part of the disinformation cover up

He ignores the pertinent parts, like why the fire raged for 8 hours and how the fire department never tried to put it out. You see those parts make his claims look as stupid as they are.

and YOU ignore the fact that other buildings that were much closer to the towers which had far more extensive fires than bld 7 and had far mor extensive damage that day did not collapse and that the towers and bld 7 were all owned by Silverstein and none of the other buildings which did not collapse that day were not owned by him.you coincidence theorists logic is hysterical.

the voice of stupidty speaks those other buildings were constructed differently then wtc ....

 

[LA RAM FAN]

two farts in a row from you Dawgshit.