The third building which collapsed on 9/11 was not hit by a plane

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Dissent, Sep 11, 2012.

  1. Dissent
    Offline

    Dissent BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    3,131
    Thanks Received:
    213
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    FEMA region 4
    Ratings:
    +214
  2. teapartysamurai
    Offline

    teapartysamurai Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Messages:
    18,792
    Thanks Received:
    2,267
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,781
  3. blastoff
    Offline

    blastoff Undocumented Reg. User

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    13,494
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    In a galaxy far far away...
    Ratings:
    +4,592
    So post it in the crazy forum where it belongs.
     
  4. RDD_1210
    Offline

    RDD_1210 Forms his own opinions

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    14,638
    Thanks Received:
    1,295
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,001
    Really? Today? Give me a fucking break.
     
  5. teapartysamurai
    Offline

    teapartysamurai Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Messages:
    18,792
    Thanks Received:
    2,267
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,781
    Those Truthers never give it up.

    There are still idiots who think we never went to the moon.

    Crazy is always crazy.
     
  6. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,537
    Thanks Received:
    8,161
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,153
    so having the debris of two other buildings collapse into it isnt going to cause any damage?
     
  7. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    NIST determined damage from falling debris was not a factor in the collapse of wtc 7 and that and fires caused an "extraordinary event". Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the entire building down

    NIST determined That the loss of WTC 7’s Column 79—the structural component identified as the one whose failure on 9/11 started the progressive collapse and would still have led to a complete loss of the building if fire or damage from the falling debris of the nearby WTC 1 tower were not factors. The investigation team concluded that the column’s failure under any circumstance would have initiated the destructive sequence of events.
     
  8. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    there are still idiots that profess to support the official conclusion yet still cite damage and diesel fuel as reasons for an "inevitable collapse"
     
  9. daws101
    Offline

    daws101 BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2011
    Messages:
    41,528
    Thanks Received:
    3,041
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    ontario,ca not canada
    Ratings:
    +9,111
    odd the eot's quotes a series of documents he thinks are bullshit or part of the disinformation cover up:eusa_whistle:
     
  10. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,518
    Thanks Received:
    5,898
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,929
    He ignores the pertinent parts, like why the fire raged for 8 hours and how the fire department never tried to put it out. You see those parts make his claims look as stupid as they are.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page