No great surprise there. What I did find refreshing was that other than Sotomayor (who correctly recused herself) it was unanimous. The Supreme Court has issued the following statement...
Writing for an essentially unanimous court (Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused herself because she was part of a lower-court ruling on the case), the ultra-liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated, The Court, we caution, endorses no particular view of the complicated issues related to carbon dioxide emissions and climate change.
No longer can alarmists claim the Supreme Court has validated the alarmist claims..
Score one for intellectual honesty...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/21/supremes-retreat-from-climate-panic/
Writing for an essentially unanimous court (Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused herself because she was part of a lower-court ruling on the case), the ultra-liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated, The Court, we caution, endorses no particular view of the complicated issues related to carbon dioxide emissions and climate change.
No longer can alarmists claim the Supreme Court has validated the alarmist claims..
Score one for intellectual honesty...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/21/supremes-retreat-from-climate-panic/