The Stupid Solution of Monitoring the Mentally Ill

NoTeaPartyPleez

Gold Member
Dec 2, 2012
11,826
1,912
245
What did the mentally ill do before high-powered assault weapons?

"Lizzie Borden took an AK-47 and gave her father 40 whacks. When she saw what she had done, she gave her mother 41"?

I wonder how far Lanza would have gotten if he had been wielding an ax? He would have been whacking away at that window and trying to climb through broken shards of glass as someone inside would be dialing 911. By then the other admins and teachers would have been racing inside to lock themselves and the kids into classrooms and closets for lock down. The police arrived in 10 minutes so I suspect that there would have been only one or two victims, if any, before Lanza would have proceeded to the first locked door and swung his ax. And the children would be alive today.

But hey, what do I know?
 
Last edited:
mental healthcare is needed in this country.

problems sometimes have more than JUST ONE solution
 
You don't know much...

This whacko wanted to kill people.. and nothing was going to stop him.. this type of person, without guns, would use pipe bombs, a truck crashing thru a wall or into a playground, handguns, machetes, fire, or whatever else... evil will find a way... limiting law abiding citizens will do nothing to curb it
 
We can certainly PAY for more mental health care. Not that it will have any effect on individual mental health, but it will make us feel so good to pay. Almost like it will work.
 
If all Lanza had had were knives, or a big machete, he would have had a hell of a time trying to get through that window. His blade would be bouncing off that glass as the admin inside was dialing 911.

So let's say he had a baseball bat to break the glass before cutting the shit out of himself through the broken glass into the office. Same scenario and timing as the ax example above.

You stupid, ignorant arrogant redneck rightwingers can go back and read the Bill of Rights and the year it was written and realize that the founding fathers were referring to muskets for "arms". So you want to keep your guns and abide by the Constitution? Here...here's your damn gun.
charleville-revolutionary-war-musket-2235.jpg

 
Fortunately for the rest of us, it's not up to you to decide what others can own or not own, which is the way it's supposed to be.
 
You don't know much...

This whacko wanted to kill people.. and nothing was going to stop him.. this type of person, without guns, would use pipe bombs, a truck crashing thru a wall or into a playground, handguns, machetes, fire, or whatever else... evil will find a way... limiting law abiding citizens will do nothing to curb it

You are conjecturing and do not know what was inside his head.

I propose a real-time scenario of what would have happened if he had only an ax or a knife to breach that office window.

We DO know that his stupid mother made it very easy for him to act impulsively and without a lot of advanced planning. Now don't we?
 
Fortunately for the rest of us, it's not up to you to decide what others can own or not own, which is the way it's supposed to be.

Cute....That's what slave-owners in America used to say before the 13th Amendment was passed.
 
If all Lanza had had were knives, or a big machete, he would have had a hell of a time trying to get through that window. His blade would be bouncing off that glass as the admin inside was dialing 911.

So let's say he had a baseball bat to break the glass before cutting the shit out of himself through the broken glass into the office. Same scenario and timing as the ax example above.

You stupid, ignorant arrogant redneck rightwingers can go back and read the Bill of Rights and the year it was written and realize that the founding fathers were referring to muskets for "arms". So you want to keep your guns and abide by the Constitution? Here...here's your damn gun.
charleville-revolutionary-war-musket-2235.jpg


I can more quickly get a firearm thru illegal means than thru legal means... even if you ban weapons from us law abiding citizens, I could still get a firearm...

Your fear of the inanimate object is astounding... a person with will will set forth to do their task.. it has happened all throughout history with every sort of killing mechanism possible.... limiting the law abiding does nothing to help you
 
Fortunately for the rest of us, it's not up to you to decide what others can own or not own, which is the way it's supposed to be.

Cute....That's what slave-owners in America used to say before the 13th Amendment was passed.

Exactly, the rest of us are not your slaves, you don't get to decide what we own or don't own. Btw, your rebuttal regarding owning another human being was quite desperate, not to mention stuipd... :lol:
 
If Lanza had a knife or an axe or a crossbow instead of a gun he still would have gotten in. Don't bring up him cutting himself on broken glass because a cut never stopped anyone determined AND Lanza specifically had a condition that prevented him from feeling pain.

He went into a building where there was no one that could prevent him from doing exactly what he did. The principal and those kindergarten teachers were not going to take him down no matter what he was armed with. He was stopped by men with guns. He would have hacked and slashed until he was stopped by men with guns. If there was someone with a gun on the scene, he would have been taken down that much sooner.

Let's have a liberal wet dream. A classroom full of six year olds could have attacked a knife wielding maniac and taken him out before he killed them. That's what the libs are really saying. Adam Lanza was taken out by people with guns. If the school had an armory, he would have been taken out that much faster.
 
"But hey, what do I know?"

Not a fuck of a lot apparently.

And since you like to play "what if", "What if" the principle shot the animal in the forehead rather than sacrificing herself by heroically lunging at him with nothing, and not a prayer of surviving?
 
We can certainly PAY for more mental health care. Not that it will have any effect on individual mental health, but it will make us feel so good to pay. Almost like it will work.

So now you think medical care is a lie?
 
Fortunately for the rest of us, it's not up to you to decide what others can own or not own, which is the way it's supposed to be.

Cute....That's what slave-owners in America used to say before the 13th Amendment was passed.

Exactly, the rest of us are not your slaves, you don't get to decide what we own or don't own. Btw, your rebuttal regarding owning another human being was quite desperate, not to mention stuipd... :lol:

this current scotus has already reconfirmed the gov can ban certain weapons
 
Cute....That's what slave-owners in America used to say before the 13th Amendment was passed.

Exactly, the rest of us are not your slaves, you don't get to decide what we own or don't own. Btw, your rebuttal regarding owning another human being was quite desperate, not to mention stuipd... :lol:

this current scotus has already reconfirmed the gov can ban certain weapons

And the difference between an AR-15 and a Marlin .22 LR hunting rifle is WHAT?? Where you would ban one and not the other....

Your ignorance is astounding....

Oooooooo.. ban the SCARY looking one that LOOKS more like an M-16 :rolleyes:
 
Fortunately for the rest of us, it's not up to you to decide what others can own or not own, which is the way it's supposed to be.

Cute....That's what slave-owners in America used to say before the 13th Amendment was passed.

Exactly, the rest of us are not your slaves, you don't get to decide what we own or don't own. Btw, your rebuttal regarding owning another human being was quite desperate, not to mention stuipd... :lol:

I see that my comment went right over the point on the top of your head. You are such an 18th Century sort of guy. Would you like to join us in the 21st?

Assault weapons should be included in the law banning the making and owning of bombs, grenades, etc. 18 USC § 921 - Definitions | LII / Legal Information Institute
 
If all Lanza had had were knives, or a big machete, he would have had a hell of a time trying to get through that window. His blade would be bouncing off that glass as the admin inside was dialing 911.

So let's say he had a baseball bat to break the glass before cutting the shit out of himself through the broken glass into the office. Same scenario and timing as the ax example above.

You stupid, ignorant arrogant redneck rightwingers can go back and read the Bill of Rights and the year it was written and realize that the founding fathers were referring to muskets for "arms". So you want to keep your guns and abide by the Constitution? Here...here's your damn gun.
charleville-revolutionary-war-musket-2235.jpg


You're speaking to the choir, and speaking to deaf ears. I think this time the deaf ears camp will see that 220+ year old document tweaked and stay tweaked.
 
If all Lanza had had were knives, or a big machete, he would have had a hell of a time trying to get through that window. His blade would be bouncing off that glass as the admin inside was dialing 911.

So let's say he had a baseball bat to break the glass before cutting the shit out of himself through the broken glass into the office. Same scenario and timing as the ax example above.

You stupid, ignorant arrogant redneck rightwingers can go back and read the Bill of Rights and the year it was written and realize that the founding fathers were referring to muskets for "arms". So you want to keep your guns and abide by the Constitution? Here...here's your damn gun.
charleville-revolutionary-war-musket-2235.jpg


I can more quickly get a firearm thru illegal means than thru legal means... even if you ban weapons from us law abiding citizens, I could still get a firearm...

Your fear of the inanimate object is astounding... a person with will will set forth to do their task.. it has happened all throughout history with every sort of killing mechanism possible.... limiting the law abiding does nothing to help you

I think you should become more knowledgeable about actual gun deaths in the last 40 years as opposed to casually stating what has happened throughout history.

CLUE: Weaponry has changed drastically since WWII.
CLUE: Homeowners didn't have Uzis in their closets nor did they think they needed them. They thought those kinds of guns belonged only in the military lest they fall into the wrong hands and innocent people are killed. They were right.
 

Forum List

Back
Top