The Stupid Lie called The Theory of Evolution

[IndependantAce]

If the idea of inflation is correct, and it might be, it is possible that our universe is part of a much larger multiverse. And the most popular form would produce a kind of eternal inflation, where universes are springing up all the time. Ours would just happen to be one of them. What looks like a beginning in need of a cause may just be due to our own perspective. We like to think of effects always having a cause, but the Universe might be an exception. The Universe might simply be.

What looks like a beginning in need of a cause may just be due to our own perspective
What looks like a beginning in need of a cause may just be due to our own perspective
What looks like a beginning in need of a cause may just be due to our own perspective
What looks like a beginning in need of a cause may just be due to our own perspective

Do you fucking get it you fucking retard. You think so small. You don't have all the answers but act like you do. You're the most retarded USMB theist on these boards. At least the other fucking idiots have an excuse. They've swallowed a lie and believe this god visited. OH YEA I forgot this god has visited you too. Boss, you're a fucking joke.

While I don't agree at all with Mr. Boss on this issue, he is far from being the dumbest poster here. Lol.

Why? What do you think?

Brainwashed, but not stupid, although his arguments here on this issue are kind of stupid. Lol. People fear the unknown (death), and so these wild tales make them feel better about it. They are actually scared though. Scared to even examine that they COULD be wrong.

Belief in God is innate in humans, as well as possibly animals, It can only be conditioned out of them by outside forces. This is why atheists treat "science" as a religious surrogate, they are naturally religious creatures.

Belief in God is part of human nature - Oxford study

Animal faith - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plus if one is an atheist they can't believe in anything, such as private property. One for example can't prove that constitutional or legal rights exist using "emperical evidence", so they are therefore as much of a fairy tale as God is.

Marxism or nihlism is therefore the only logical conclusion of atheism.

That's not true at all. And I am neither of those things.

Fact is you can't prove that Constitutional rights exist using empirical testing, so atheists who believe in any type of rights have to agree that they believe some things which can't be proven with "scientific evidence".