Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Pareto principle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
economics
The original observation was in connection with population and wealth. Pareto noticed that 80% of Italy's land was owned by 20% of the population.[4] He then carried out surveys on a variety of other countries and found to his surprise that a similar distribution applied.
Due to the scale-invariant nature of the power law relationship, the relationship applies also to subsets of the income range. Even if we take the ten wealthiest individuals in the world, we see that the top three (Warren Buffett, Carlos Slim Helú, and Bill Gates) own as much as the next seven put together.[5]
A chart that gave the inequality a very visible and comprehensible form, the so-called 'champagne glass' effect,[6] was contained in the 1992 United Nations Development Program Report, which showed the distribution of global income to be very uneven, with the richest 20% of the world's population controlling 82.7% of the world's income
Even if we take the ten wealthiest individuals in the world, we see that the top three (Warren Buffett, Carlos Slim Helú, and Bill Gates) own as much as the next seven put together.[5]
Two of the top 3 are Democrats. Sure kills your theory on which party is the party of the monied people.
your program is more like SS than our 401 ks
So does that mean you know nothing about the push from pensions to 401ks and why?
Super is basically mandatory 401k. So yeah, we had the push from pensions to 401k 20 years ago. Is that happening now in the US is it?
They've been around since 1978 to 80'ish.
Pareto principle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
economics
The original observation was in connection with population and wealth. Pareto noticed that 80% of Italy's land was owned by 20% of the population.[4] He then carried out surveys on a variety of other countries and found to his surprise that a similar distribution applied.
Due to the scale-invariant nature of the power law relationship, the relationship applies also to subsets of the income range. Even if we take the ten wealthiest individuals in the world, we see that the top three (Warren Buffett, Carlos Slim Helú, and Bill Gates) own as much as the next seven put together.[5]
A chart that gave the inequality a very visible and comprehensible form, the so-called 'champagne glass' effect,[6] was contained in the 1992 United Nations Development Program Report, which showed the distribution of global income to be very uneven, with the richest 20% of the world's population controlling 82.7% of the world's income
Even if we take the ten wealthiest individuals in the world, we see that the top three (Warren Buffett, Carlos Slim Helú, and Bill Gates) own as much as the next seven put together.[5]
Two of the top 3 are Democrats. Sure kills your theory on which party is the party of the monied people.
No it doesnt you fucking fool.
be honest or go the fuck away
NO MATCHING 9%.
get it
What Is the Maximum Contribution for a 401k? | eHow.com
No manditory 9% employer contribution.
They can deside to match or not.
You get whatever they picked
What Is the Maximum Contribution for a 401k? | eHow.com
No manditory 9% employer contribution.
They can deside to match or not.
You get whatever they picked
Okay, but... okay I'm confused. So are people required to save into 401k or not? I get that employers don't have to make matching contributions, but do just people have to make mandatory contributions?
Two of the top 3 are Democrats. Sure kills your theory on which party is the party of the monied people.
No it doesnt you fucking fool.
be honest or go the fuck away
OK then. Please explain how the Republican Party is the party of the monied people when 2 of the 3 richest men in the world are Democrats.
And while you're at it, please explain how these Democrats fit into your theory...
John Kerry
Bill and Hillary Clinton
George Soros
Jon Corzine
Jay Rockefeller
Nancy Pelosi
Thankies.
What Is the Maximum Contribution for a 401k? | eHow.com
No manditory 9% employer contribution.
They can deside to match or not.
You get whatever they picked
Okay, but... okay I'm confused. So are people required to save into 401k or not? I get that employers don't have to make matching contributions, but do just people have to make mandatory contributions?
No, participation in a 401k is not mandatory.
What Is the Maximum Contribution for a 401k? | eHow.com
No manditory 9% employer contribution.
They can deside to match or not.
You get whatever they picked
Okay, but... okay I'm confused. So are people required to save into 401k or not? I get that employers don't have to make matching contributions, but do just people have to make mandatory contributions?
No it doesnt you fucking fool.
be honest or go the fuck away
OK then. Please explain how the Republican Party is the party of the monied people when 2 of the 3 richest men in the world are Democrats.
And while you're at it, please explain how these Democrats fit into your theory...
John Kerry
Bill and Hillary Clinton
George Soros
Jon Corzine
Jay Rockefeller
Nancy Pelosi
Thankies.
Its not my thoery you fucking idiot.
it a long time accepted economic effect.
wealthy people come in all kinds of personalities.
Some are money grubbing assholes who think most peopel are NOT GOOD and seek to WIN the percieved game by collecting wealth for powers sake.
some wealthy people use their wealth to make the world a better place for all.
The republican party gets most of its money not from little guys but from SOME wealthy people.
The republican program is to strip the poor of any help and crush the middle class.
its been working
What Is the Maximum Contribution for a 401k? | eHow.com
No manditory 9% employer contribution.
They can deside to match or not.
You get whatever they picked
Okay, but... okay I'm confused. So are people required to save into 401k or not? I get that employers don't have to make matching contributions, but do just people have to make mandatory contributions?
401 ks are looked on as a perk in a job.
They are a shoddy replacement for pensions and were designed so that companies didnt have to give pensions anymore.
Okay, but... okay I'm confused. So are people required to save into 401k or not? I get that employers don't have to make matching contributions, but do just people have to make mandatory contributions?
No, participation in a 401k is not mandatory.
Wow. Okay. Might want to get on that if you care about the solvency of social security.
