The Sham of "Settled Science" -- Like Global warming itself, that too was a lie

Collectivist Scientists.:lol::cuckoo::eusa_whistle:

Walleyes, you have outdone yourself in idiocy yet one more time.




Yes, I know, but I have so far to reach your august levels old fraud. You have set the bar so high I doubt anyone can reach your level of foolishness.
 
I see. So we just give equal weight to the rantings of any nut on the net to that of real scientists engaged in studying the subject. And you are a schoolteacher?:eusa_whistle:

Are you a used car salesman?

Because the degree to which you will lie to sell this BS is astounding...

My, my Suckee........ Yap-yap, and no substance. Poor baby.

Substance? Like the way you have been caught time and again lying? or all the times you were caught not understanding what you post fully? How about all the times you took a headline and went with it without even reading the article???

Douchebag puppeteer, your posts are all the substance I need and more...:lol:
 
Collectivist Scientists.:lol::cuckoo::eusa_whistle:

Walleyes, you have outdone yourself in idiocy yet one more time.




Yes, I know, but I have so far to reach your august levels old fraud. You have set the bar so high I doubt anyone can reach your level of foolishness.
Well first you'd have to make it to the less than ivory halls of a community technical college or the august drywall halls of night school. AND manage to graduate with at least a letter based grade.

Then you must schlep on over to your local factory and see if they're hiring.

Then you are ready to begin your journey to be as awe inspiring and all powerful like Old Rocks. Working on the truth in global warming from his Homer Simpson like office where he chair moistens daily.

Only then! Can you know the Unabomber truth!
 
I see. So we just give equal weight to the rantings of any nut on the net to that of real scientists engaged in studying the subject. And you are a schoolteacher?:eusa_whistle:
I never said I was or was not a schoolteacher. YOU said I was with such moral certainty that I just didn't have it in my heart to correct your absolute truth about what I do for a living.

But know this, I have access to your children's minds for 2-4 hours a day and I do correct them on global warming, pollution and other econazi lies. They're always so relieved to know that the polar bears aren't dying off, and they aren't going to live in a desert next year. I believe the last discussion I debunked them on the premise that 'oil is evil'.

Very satisfying. So many young minds... inoculated against your fantasies. Makes one have hope.

BTW, Crocks, thanks for your quote. It is a very effective signature for every time you start spouting your palaver.
 
Last edited:
No, you have access to some children's minds, not mine. They are allready grown.

And I would not expect you to teach or have knowledge of science.

As for the sentence, it stands on it's own. Those who are incapable of understanding what is said, such as yourself, are incapable of understanding the whole debate.
 
No, you have access to some children's minds, not mine. They are allready grown.

And I would not expect you to teach or have knowledge of science.

As for the sentence, it stands on it's own. Those who are incapable of understanding what is said, such as yourself, are incapable of understanding the whole debate.
I'll settle for your grand children then. Somebody's gotta plant seeds of truth in the fertilizer being packed in there. Oh! Or are they going to be good econazi children and end your line of progeny so the planet can live on and survive it's human infection?

And you can expect what you want, but just like this... it doesn't make it so.

Just like you're quote. You can say it however you want, as nuanced as you want. You don't get to control what other people make of it either.

Don'tcha just hate it when reality gets in the way of your perfect little theory?
 
The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider. The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was “only a few dozen experts,” he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography, co-authored with student Martin Mahony.

“Claims such as ‘2,500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous,” the paper states unambiguously, adding that they rendered “the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism.”

Hulme, Professor of Climate Change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia – the university of Climategate fame — is the founding Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and one of the UK’s most prominent climate scientists. Among his many roles in the climate change establishment, Hulme was the IPCC’s co-ordinating Lead Author for its chapter on ‘Climate scenario development’ for its Third Assessment Report and a contributing author of several other chapters.

Full report from which this came here:

The Sham of ‘Settled Science’ — Insider Says There Was No IPCC Consensus - Big Journalism

Bottom line:

Once AGAIN, we have SCIENCE taking a back seat to a POLITICAL GRAB FOR POWER, and that was all "Global Warming" was ever about.

It's a hoax, just as conservatives have been saying for 30 years.

The proof that liberals don't care about FACTS is, the evidence keeps mounting this was a hoax, and they still cling to this myth of global warming, regardless of the evidence.

And then they say Christians are the ones that believe myths? :lol::lol::lol:

It's also proof that global warming IS the religion of liberals.

Who was it that said take away the belief in God, and you will believe in anything?

This is a perfect example of that axiom right here.

Cue up the sputtering of hysterical enviro-wackos, I hear them coming now.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Well, if some website on the internet says it's a hoax, it must be true!!!

After all, a website could never be a hoax, right? :lol::lol:

That's pretty lame and desperate on your part.

When you have real evidence of that, (like I do for global warming) let me know. :lol:
 
Conservatives need to keep right on denying anything that smacks of "science". After all, they have "Gawd".

6% of scientists admit to being Republican. That number will only shrink. For some really odd reason, Republicans and conservatives complain about Democrats and liberals, but offer nothing of value. Pity.

Typical of liberals. When you can't defend your side, try to change the subject.

The only problem with your little screed is, it is YOU that is denying science. Science requires critical thinking and the ability to hold up to those that challenge conclusions.

Global Warming, on the other hand is a HOAX, covered up by politically motivated FRAUDS NOT SCIENTISTS, who were foolish enough to leave a cyber trail of emails and now evidence that "scientific consensus" never existed either.

So, nice try but projection, won't change the subject.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Wow! Wow! Wow! LOL They lie about everything!

They say 2,500 support but its only a few dozen LOL

Warmers are fucking retards and 94% of the are Democrats

Scientists lie about everything? Lucky we have conservatives who know about "real things", like "Noah's Ark" and "Magical Creation".

Desperately trying to change the subject.

NOTICE NONE OF THESE LIBS ARE EVEN TRYING TO DENY GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX.

Whether they like it or not, they are tacitly admitting what we conservatives have known for THIRTY YEARS.

Global warming is a BIG FREAKING LIE, A FRAUD, A HOAX.

We knew it, and now you liberals know it too.

Let that burn on the way down as you try to make snarky comments that won't help cool the burn.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
that's it. close the debate.

anonymous internet scientiest teabagsamurai has spoken.

What debate??????

Liberals like Al Gore have been telling us for years THERE WAS NO DEBATE.

That it was "settled science."

It is conservatives that have been trying to open the debate for YEARS and liberals like Al Gore, refused to even debate, because they knew this was really a house of cards.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Let's see. All the Scientific Societies in the world, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities agree that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. But some nitwit on the internet says it is not so. So who to believe, such difficult decisions.


They all agree?


Produce that evidence. Or is it too hard now with all the evidence of it being a hoax.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Is there a scientific consensus on global warming?

The skeptic argument...There is no consensus

The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists signing the petition stating "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere". (Petition Project)

What the science says...
That humans are causing global warming is the position of the Academies of Science from 19 countries plus many scientific organizations that study climate science. More specifically, around 95% of active climate researchers actively publishing climate papers endorse the consensus position.


Inevitably, there will be scientists who are skeptical about man-made global warming. A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn't publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate change responded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.


Keep on peddling your politically motivated screed.

Real scientists know there is no such thing as "consensus."

It's science that holds up under challenges, and global warming is falling apart under the scandal of fraud.
 
I see. So we just give equal weight to the rantings of any nut on the net to that of real scientists engaged in studying the subject. And you are a schoolteacher?:eusa_whistle:


The nuts are the people who think man can warm the earth.

Here's a clue to the real nuts. THE SUN WARMS THE EARTH YOU CLUELESS MORONS, NOT MAN!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
No, you have access to some children's minds, not mine. They are allready grown.

And I would not expect you to teach or have knowledge of science.

As for the sentence, it stands on it's own. Those who are incapable of understanding what is said, such as yourself, are incapable of understanding the whole debate.

If it stands on it's own, how come there is more and more evidence it's a fraud?

:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Conservatives need to keep right on denying anything that smacks of "science". After all, they have "Gawd".

6% of scientists admit to being Republican. That number will only shrink....
parrot_in_a_hat-sm.jpg

6%....6%....6%....6%....
RAAAAAAAAK!

For the life of me, I still can't figure out what in hell that's supposed to mean anyways.

Quelle surprise!!! :lol:
 
Full report from which this came here:

The Sham of ‘Settled Science’ — Insider Says There Was No IPCC Consensus - Big Journalism

Bottom line:

Once AGAIN, we have SCIENCE taking a back seat to a POLITICAL GRAB FOR POWER, and that was all "Global Warming" was ever about.

It's a hoax, just as conservatives have been saying for 30 years.

The proof that liberals don't care about FACTS is, the evidence keeps mounting this was a hoax, and they still cling to this myth of global warming, regardless of the evidence.

And then they say Christians are the ones that believe myths? :lol::lol::lol:

It's also proof that global warming IS the religion of liberals.

Who was it that said take away the belief in God, and you will believe in anything?

This is a perfect example of that axiom right here.

Cue up the sputtering of hysterical enviro-wackos, I hear them coming now.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Well, if some website on the internet says it's a hoax, it must be true!!!

After all, a website could never be a hoax, right? :lol::lol:

That's pretty lame and desperate on your part.

When you have real evidence of that, (like I do for global warming) let me know. :lol:

I doubt there's a more credible source than you OP's "some guy on the Internet"

Everyone knows that "some guy on the Internet" would never lie, right?
 
I see. So we just give equal weight to the rantings of any nut on the net to that of real scientists engaged in studying the subject. And you are a schoolteacher?:eusa_whistle:


The nuts are the people who think man can warm the earth.

Here's a clue to the real nuts. THE SUN WARMS THE EARTH YOU CLUELESS MORONS, NOT MAN!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Hmmm...... So ol' Teabagger Wilted thinks that passes for debate.

Really, you are so much the kind of idiot that stands out with a sign that says "Keep governement out of my Medicare!":lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top