The SCOTUS Rules For Travel Ban

[Crepitus]

Any questions?


Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban - USA TODAY Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban — USA TODAY

Gorsuch is doing more damage to this country that tRump can.

Yeah, well a handful of KY Jelly slathered in your ass crack might help you get over it.

So, you like old guys with greasy ass cracks? You're a perverted little pin-head aren't ya.

LOL...nice try, albeit quite lame.

Crepitus thinks he is speaking to a member of one of the Democrat special interest groups when he speaks of perverts who like men’s greasy asses.

Oh, is your butt-buddy who suggested it a democrat?

 

[DOTR]

Any questions?


Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban - USA TODAY Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban — USA TODAY

Gorsuch is doing more damage to this country that tRump can.

Look on the Bright Side….

Trump will have a few more Supreme Court Picks

In the next 7 and a half years….

This will Make America Great for the next 30 years…

Suck on that.

Not if we take back the Senate. If so I better we wait until after the next general election. It's only fair that the people have their say right?

If you take back the Senate then Trump will still send Constitutionalist judges up. If not confirmed by the communists in the Democrat Party then the court will continue as is until such time as Republicans take the majority again.
A Ginsbergless court will be nice Oy Vey! Even without a replacement.
And the decisions will be 5-3 from then on.

We should wait until.the next presidential election. The people deserve to be heard. Just ask Mitch.

Trump will win the next election too so it wouldn’t make much difference.
Democrats have been spanked out of the House, Senate and White House and as a result will lose the Supreme Court and federal judiciary for decades. Socialism will be expelled from America to remain only in shitholes like Venezuela and N Korea and in the fevered minds of a reduced Democrat Party representing urban slums, Mexican border areas and billionaire enclaves on the coasts.
Without the ability to import uneducated third worlders steeped in Marxist rhetoric to outvote Americans the Democrat Party can only wither.

 

[DOTR]

Any questions?


Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban - USA TODAY Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban — USA TODAY

Gorsuch is doing more damage to this country that tRump can.

Look on the Bright Side….

Trump will have a few more Supreme Court Picks

In the next 7 and a half years….

This will Make America Great for the next 30 years…

Suck on that.

Not if we take back the Senate. If so I better we wait until after the next general election. It's only fair that the people have their say right?

If you take back the Senate then Trump will still send Constitutionalist judges up. If not confirmed by the communists in the Democrat Party then the court will continue as is until such time as Republicans take the majority again.
A Ginsbergless court will be nice Oy Vey! Even without a replacement.
And the decisions will be 5-3 from then on.

We should wait until.the next presidential election. The people deserve to be heard. Just ask Mitch.

You still think the loser sets the rules? Nope. Mitch says Trump picks the next Justice. Nothing you can do about it...unless wearing a pussy hat counts as doing something.

 

[DJT for Life]

sounds good to me . What i liked was that The TRUMPS statements about muslims being a problem before he issued the BAN were no big deal .

I believe they did consider his statements but National Security ruled over it.

No where in the constitution is it written that his powers of immigration are to be tempered by his previous statements, any perceived biases, or feelings. It’s his power to use as he wishes. That is the law.

Of course not. The Dems just don't understand that. A law is written out
and the law is what is written on the paper. Not what somebody said about
it. After the Travel Ban and the ruling on Public Sector Unions, I believe it
would be wise for the Government to place Kagan and Sotomeyer on a suicie
watch.

 

[Deno]

He still makes time for SPANKING liberal ass.

Long Live President Donald J. Trump....

Yeah... No. Not without a little help from his Russian pals.

That is one lame ass excuse for getting your ass stomped....

The Russian Bull Shit is being shown for what it is...

Trump will soon stick this up your ass too.

Is life good or what?

You sound a little desperate.

Everything ok over there in tRumplandia?

I am having the time of my life...

Heard any election results?

Whoever like Trumps is craving a fatherly image to be an authority over them, you must be white and a protestant, perhaps a WASP.

You are no doubt an Ignorant Bigot....

 

[Crepitus]

Yeah... No. Not without a little help from his Russian pals.

That is one lame ass excuse for getting your ass stomped....

The Russian Bull Shit is being shown for what it is...

Trump will soon stick this up your ass too.

Is life good or what?

You sound a little desperate.

Everything ok over there in tRumplandia?

I am having the time of my life...

Heard any election results?

Whoever like Trumps is craving a fatherly image to be an authority over them, you must be white and a protestant, perhaps a WASP.

You are no doubt an Ignorant Bigot....

Lol

 

[Deno]

That is one lame ass excuse for getting your ass stomped....

The Russian Bull Shit is being shown for what it is...

Trump will soon stick this up your ass too.

Is life good or what?

You sound a little desperate.

Everything ok over there in tRumplandia?

I am having the time of my life...

Heard any election results?

Whoever like Trumps is craving a fatherly image to be an authority over them, you must be white and a protestant, perhaps a WASP.

You are no doubt an Ignorant Bigot....

Lol

LOL, I bet your Butt Hurt is Worse today....

Are we having fun or what?

Thanks for playing Dummy....

 

[Cecilie1200]

You mean the travel ban that we were told would only last a few months?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Which hasn't even started yet, because of all the court injunctions, if I remember correctly.

 

[Cecilie1200]

About damned time.

We sure don't need any more of the death cult in the US. We already have all those non vetted Syrian's that Obama forced States to take.

We sure don't need any more.

AGREE!
Good people continue to WIN with a real leader at the helm. Weird how that works huh?

I agree and I knew the SC would approve of what Trump is doing.

To bad other Judges aren't interested in what the Constitution allows.

SCOTUS did not approve of what Trump is doing, that is not their job. They merely agreed he had the authority to do it.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Actually, that's true. From the ruling:

"Whether the President’s chosen method of addressing perceived risks is justified from a policy perspective is irrelevant to the scope of his [§1182(f)] authority."

 

[Cecilie1200]

No link yet. It is just being announced.

Vote was 5-4 reaffirming the President has the authority in immigration
cases.

Soooo the four left winger USSC judges wanted to allow travel from 5 terrorist hotbed countries?
Their job is to protect the American people. It's not their job to be politically correct to the point of danger.

It's actually NOT their job to "protect the American people". It's their job to decide legal cases according to the relevant laws. Whether or not they are "good" laws or "bad" laws, "protect" or "endanger", is not for them to decide.

 

[Cecilie1200]

About damned time.

We sure don't need any more of the death cult in the US. We already have all those non vetted Syrian's that Obama forced States to take.

We sure don't need any more.

AGREE!
Good people continue to WIN with a real leader at the helm. Weird how that works huh?

I agree and I knew the SC would approve of what Trump is doing.

To bad other Judges aren't interested in what the Constitution allows.

SCOTUS did not approve of what Trump is doing, that is not their job. They merely agreed he had the authority to do it.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Actually 4 judges did disapprove of what Trump is doing. That, or those 4 judges don't understand the law.

It's both. They disapprove, and they don't understand the law, which doesn't ask whether they approve or not.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Any questions?


Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban - USA TODAY Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban — USA TODAY

Yeah. What took so long?

Wending through all the lower courts first.

 

[Cecilie1200]

About damned time.

We sure don't need any more of the death cult in the US. We already have all those non vetted Syrian's that Obama forced States to take.

We sure don't need any more.

AGREE!
Good people continue to WIN with a real leader at the helm. Weird how that works huh?

I agree and I knew the SC would approve of what Trump is doing.

To bad other Judges aren't interested in what the Constitution allows.

SCOTUS did not approve of what Trump is doing, that is not their job. They merely agreed he had the authority to do it.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Actually 4 judges did disapprove of what Trump is doing. That, or those 4 judges don't understand the law.

“BUT , BUT, BUT...Hillary won the popular vote.”

That and $10 will get her a cup of coffee from Starbuck's . . . so long as she doesn't want cream and sugar.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Any questions?


Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban - USA TODAY Supreme Court upholds President Trump's controversial travel ban — USA TODAY

Gorsuch is doing more damage to this country that tRump can.

Interesting that you think applying the law as written is "damage to the country".

Very revealing.

 

[DOTR]

No link yet. It is just being announced.

Vote was 5-4 reaffirming the President has the authority in immigration
cases.

Soooo the four left winger USSC judges wanted to allow travel from 5 terrorist hotbed countries?
Their job is to protect the American people. It's not their job to be politically correct to the point of danger.

It's actually NOT their job to "protect the American people". It's their job to decide legal cases according to the relevant laws. Whether or not they are "good" laws or "bad" laws, "protect" or "endanger", is not for them to decide.

Smart post of the year

 

[Cecilie1200]

Trump can remove NK from the "ban" with a stroke of a pen if he sees fit.

A bit of his usual flip-flopping??.....
Have another glass of orange kool-aid ..........LOL

Depends on whether or not the situation changes.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Actually 4 judges did disapprove of what Trump is doing. That, or those 4 judges don't understand the law.

“BUT , BUT, BUT...Hillary won the popular vote.”

Yes she did and so did Gore, so what does that tell you.

It's tells me the electoral college is doing exactly what it's supposed to do which is prevent mob rule.

Think about this next time some fool thinks we should do away with the electoral college . . . .

States with a smaller population than Los Angeles County

Well then, those states should get some more people!

We don't actually WANT them, thanks.

 

[Cecilie1200]

No link yet. It is just being announced.

Vote was 5-4 reaffirming the President has the authority in immigration
cases.

Soooo the four left winger USSC judges wanted to allow travel from 5 terrorist hotbed countries?
Their job is to protect the American people. It's not their job to be politically correct to the point of danger.

It's actually NOT their job to "protect the American people". It's their job to decide legal cases according to the relevant laws. Whether or not they are "good" laws or "bad" laws, "protect" or "endanger", is not for them to decide.

Smart post of the year

It's amazing how your perspective can change when you don't think you're called upon to "approve" or "disapprove" of every damned thing under the sun.

 

[DOTR]

No link yet. It is just being announced.

Vote was 5-4 reaffirming the President has the authority in immigration
cases.

Soooo the four left winger USSC judges wanted to allow travel from 5 terrorist hotbed countries?
Their job is to protect the American people. It's not their job to be politically correct to the point of danger.

It's actually NOT their job to "protect the American people". It's their job to decide legal cases according to the relevant laws. Whether or not they are "good" laws or "bad" laws, "protect" or "endanger", is not for them to decide.

Smart post of the year

It's amazing how your perspective can change when you don't think you're called upon to "approve" or "disapprove" of every damned thing under the sun.

Ironically enough it was liberals who pushed the SC into every area of life from schools to wombs.
They didn’t imagine they would ever lose the reigns of such control and, knowing what they themselves planned to do with it, they are now rightfully terrified.