Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by LittleNipper, Sep 4, 2018.
DNA --- What it is and isn't DNA & Genetics – Evolution Is Not The Answer
I should have said MOST ALL; however, it is just as likely that these dinosaurs were victims of the Flood. Obviously the fossils of Pompeii were not part of the Flood, but that is much more recent and not being debated here.
Lordy, lordy, why don't you just wear a big sign, Willfully Ignorant? There are many places in the world with dinosaur fossils in volcanic ash, a whole herd of them in Montana, and here are some from China;
Ancient Ash Volcanoes Entombed Chinese Dinosaurs
There was certainly a big flood after snowball earth but humans could not have witnessed it! At least with what we know about man kind! That all being said please tell me how the Hblocks at PumaPuncu got toppled. MOst likely a flood from what is seen. Further more one must think a bit about perspective when looking at these stories. Considering there were no telephones or satalites one could look around for as far as the eye could see and see flood. To this persons eyes it would appear as though the known world was flooded.
There was a flood at the infilling of the Black Sea. There were multiple floods in the Spokane Floods, and even a flood from Lake Bonneville down the Snake. There were tsunami caused floods in Doggerland and many other places. But they were not at the same time, many thousands of years apart. Yes, and to the locals, it would appear as if their whole world were flooded. But none of this gives any support at all to the myth of the Biblical flood. All of these floods left evidence of there passage. There is no such evidence for a worldwide flood.
The HYDROPLATE THEORY
Walt Brown has some rather odd notions about science.
Encyclopedia of American Loons: #537: Walt Brown
The falsifications of the science positions posted in the video is another of the devices used by creationists to create the illusion that creationism is a viable mechanism to explain the diversity of life on the planet. Christian creationism is simply the misrepresentation of authoritative scientific research; The lack of actual research undertaken by the christian creationist ministries and the refusal to submit research and results for peer review. The entirety of the creationist argument is to appeal to people with a prior commitment to religious dogma. However, since there is nothing in the literature of the Christian creationist ministries to support their arguments, their charade of authority can be maintained only by pressing a distorted caricature of how the Scientific Method is actually maintained.
If you want science, you need to look to sources other than fundamentalist ministries.
Try here: Problems with a Global Flood, 2nd edition
If you want the truth concerning GOD and HIS creation, you cannot rely on atheists and their theories as the final say.
The reality is that Noah and his family obviously didn't sit on their duffs for a year. They had jobs to do in caring for the animals. The Bible clearly says that GOD brought the animals to the ark. Noah didn't have to run after them. And it is a shame that men of science have to be labeled nuts by people who do not believe in GOD and see no other possibilities other than evolution.
Demonstrably false, ridiculous pap.
You mean "scientific theories" and, unlike your authoritative religious nonsense, they rely on evidence, not on the strident insistence of a guy in funny clothes who molests children.
Separate names with a comma.