The Russian collusion lie is over....let's move on to lying about obstruction of justice....

[2aguy]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

 

[gipper]

...and once obstruction is disproved, they will move on to something else.

 

[Cellblock2429]

...and once obstruction is disproved, they will move on to something else.

/---- Maybe this shocking scandal will be next...

 

[hadit]

...and once obstruction is disproved, they will move on to something else.

/---- Maybe this shocking scandal will be next...
View attachment 134758

They tried it on Rubio.

 

[BULLDOG]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

 

[2aguy]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

The democrats kept adding to his mandate asswipe.....

 

[BULLDOG]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

The democrats kept adding to his mandate asswipe.....

What? Are you mumbling more of your cap again?

 

[jknowgood]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

 

[Cellblock2429]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

/---- You posted "but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job." Are you that uninformed or just spinning for your Dem masters?

 

[jknowgood]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

/---- You posted "but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job." Are you that uninformed or just spinning for your Dem masters?

The morning talking points made him think Clinton was impeach because of a blow job. Not the lying under oath he did.

 

[hadit]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

Is that really what people tell you happened?

Truth: Bubba was impeached because he lied under oath and filed false affidavits.

 

[grainbely]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

Right? They did it with Clinton and Benghazi, too. They drug it out longer than many others like it desperate to find something yet no fault found in the handling of benghazi..BUT WAIT!..whats this email server shenanigans?...digdigdig...political assasination.

 

[BULLDOG]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

/---- You posted "but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job." Are you that uninformed or just spinning for your Dem masters?

Call it what you want. Bottom line, he lied about a blow job. I'm pretty sure he's not the first to lie about that.

 

[BULLDOG]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

/---- You posted "but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job." Are you that uninformed or just spinning for your Dem masters?

The morning talking points made him think Clinton was impeach because of a blow job. Not the lying under oath he did.

I was around when it happened. Gingrich, who was fooling around on his wife, who was dying of cancer at the time, spearheaded the impeachment which was about a blowjob.

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

Is that really what people tell you happened?

Truth: Bubba was impeached because he lied under oath and filed false affidavits.

About a blowjob.

 

[Cellblock2429]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

/---- You posted "but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job." Are you that uninformed or just spinning for your Dem masters?

The morning talking points made him think Clinton was impeach because of a blow job. Not the lying under oath he did.

I was around when it happened. Gingrich, who was fooling around on his wife, who was dying of cancer at the time, spearheaded the impeachment which was about a blowjob.

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

Is that really what people tell you happened?

Truth: Bubba was impeached because he lied under oath and filed false affidavits.

About a blowjob.

/---- So lying about sex in Federal Court is Okey Dokie with you?

 

[BULLDOG]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

/---- You posted "but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job." Are you that uninformed or just spinning for your Dem masters?

The morning talking points made him think Clinton was impeach because of a blow job. Not the lying under oath he did.

I was around when it happened. Gingrich, who was fooling around on his wife, who was dying of cancer at the time, spearheaded the impeachment which was about a blowjob.

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

Is that really what people tell you happened?

Truth: Bubba was impeached because he lied under oath and filed false affidavits.

About a blowjob.

/---- So lying about sex in Federal Court is Okey Dokie with you?

It's certainly not as dangerous for out country as lying about connections to Russia while they were attacking out elections with the intention of helping Trump.

 

[blastoff]

Aww...we gotta move on already? We hardly got to know the Russian make-believe bullshit as it was only around for months and months and months. Shucks, I'm really gonna miss it.

Okay, pivot to obstruction. Someone cue the lefty jerks, bring up the lights and let's get this show on the road until it runs out of steam too.

 

[jknowgood]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

/---- You posted "but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job." Are you that uninformed or just spinning for your Dem masters?

The morning talking points made him think Clinton was impeach because of a blow job. Not the lying under oath he did.

I was around when it happened. Gingrich, who was fooling around on his wife, who was dying of cancer at the time, spearheaded the impeachment which was about a blowjob.

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

Is that really what people tell you happened?

Truth: Bubba was impeached because he lied under oath and filed false affidavits.

About a blowjob.

He got impeached because he lied under oath.

 

[BULLDOG]

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

/---- You posted "but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job." Are you that uninformed or just spinning for your Dem masters?

The morning talking points made him think Clinton was impeach because of a blow job. Not the lying under oath he did.

I was around when it happened. Gingrich, who was fooling around on his wife, who was dying of cancer at the time, spearheaded the impeachment which was about a blowjob.

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

Is that really what people tell you happened?

Truth: Bubba was impeached because he lied under oath and filed false affidavits.

About a blowjob.

He got impeached because he lied under oath.

ABOUT A BLOW JOB!!!

 

[jknowgood]

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

/---- You posted "but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job." Are you that uninformed or just spinning for your Dem masters?

The morning talking points made him think Clinton was impeach because of a blow job. Not the lying under oath he did.

I was around when it happened. Gingrich, who was fooling around on his wife, who was dying of cancer at the time, spearheaded the impeachment which was about a blowjob.

And the lie about Trump colluding with Russia has just about run it's course.....how do we know...the left wingers pushing it are admitting they lied....

NYT's Brooks: Let's face it, there's really no evidence on this Russian collusion stuff and this isn't Watergate - Hot Air

The New York Times’ David Brooks isn’t your typical conservative. In fact, many in the movement don’t consider the columnist an ally at all. He’s of a more moderate stripe and not one to shy away from criticizing Republicans; he once called Sarah Palin a “cancer” to the party. Yet, he did voice his concern about the lack of evidence being put forward with all the Russian collusion hysteria that’s embroiled the liberal news media and the Democratic Party. Are we getting ahead of ourselves? It seems that the “politics of scandal” that the Left is so desperately trying to gin up against Trump while lacking evidence to do so is making Mr. Brooks nervous; he made it known on last Sunday’s Meet The Press. He also said that what’s been discussed isn’t Watergate reloaded:

----

Even if the investigations find no evidence that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians, the president’s refusal to accept the truth about this attack on our democracy denies reality and leaves the country vulnerable to more damaging attacks. The true obsession is Mr. Trump’s, with his own brand, and it’s distracting him from his most important duty — to protect the nation.

Ken Star was supposed to investigate Vince Foster's suicide and that failed whitewater deal, but ended up impeaching the president for a blow job. Buckle up,and keep your hands inside the cart, because this is going to be a long and exciting ride. Right wingers wrote the book on how these things should be run, and I hope we follow that example closely.

Is that really what people tell you happened?

Truth: Bubba was impeached because he lied under oath and filed false affidavits.

About a blowjob.

/---- So lying about sex in Federal Court is Okey Dokie with you?

It's certainly not as dangerous for out country as lying about connections to Russia while they were attacking out elections with the intention of helping Trump.

There is no Trump, Putin connection.