The Rubio Blunt Amendment. A surefire winner..for Democrats.

Democrats couldn't have asked for a better wedge issue. Re-litigating contraception. This almost assures more women votes for Democrats..and not only in the Presidential elections.

More and more one can't help but wondering..do Republicans really want to lose?

Democrats in control of the U.S. Senate rejected an amendment Thursday from U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., that would have permitted employers to refuse to cover health-care costs contrary to their religious beliefs -- mainly birth-control and abortion-inducing drugs. The amendment went down on a 51-48 vote.
Marco Rubio and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Clash Over Obama Birth-Control Measure -- Blunt Amendment | Sunshine State News

There is no Rubio-Blunt amendment.

Not anymore! :lol:
 
Democrats couldn't have asked for a better wedge issue. Re-litigating contraception. This almost assures more women votes for Democrats..and not only in the Presidential elections.

More and more one can't help but wondering..do Republicans really want to lose?

Democrats in control of the U.S. Senate rejected an amendment Thursday from U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., that would have permitted employers to refuse to cover health-care costs contrary to their religious beliefs -- mainly birth-control and abortion-inducing drugs. The amendment went down on a 51-48 vote.
Marco Rubio and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Clash Over Obama Birth-Control Measure -- Blunt Amendment | Sunshine State News

If you think Obama can win on this feel free. This issue has pissed off Catholics, Jews, Mormons, and Evangelicals all over the country. Now Obama is trying to change the subject by claiming it's about Rush calling some lying co-ed a slut.

Think you can win on that?
 
Democrats couldn't have asked for a better wedge issue. Re-litigating contraception. This almost assures more women votes for Democrats..and not only in the Presidential elections.

More and more one can't help but wondering..do Republicans really want to lose?

Democrats in control of the U.S. Senate rejected an amendment Thursday from U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., that would have permitted employers to refuse to cover health-care costs contrary to their religious beliefs -- mainly birth-control and abortion-inducing drugs. The amendment went down on a 51-48 vote.
Marco Rubio and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Clash Over Obama Birth-Control Measure -- Blunt Amendment | Sunshine State News

If you think Obama can win on this feel free. This issue has pissed off Catholics, Jews, Mormons, and Evangelicals all over the country. Now Obama is trying to change the subject by claiming it's about Rush calling some lying co-ed a slut.

Think you can win on that?

We'll see. And you are right..it has pissed off many people. But not in a way I believe would be good for a republican nominee.

You guys want theocracy and that isn't going to happen.
 
It's just more and more proof how anti Constitutional the Dem's are.
Everyone is seeing it for what it really is.
 
This woman actually said that somebody told her she had seizures without contraception. It's wonderful to be able to repeat any rumor or urban legend in front of congress that you want.

This is beyond ridiculous.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjhfUuW8Vgo&feature=relmfu]Fluke Responds to Nationwide Campaign Against Contraceptives - YouTube[/ame]
 
Democrats couldn't have asked for a better wedge issue. Re-litigating contraception. This almost assures more women votes for Democrats..and not only in the Presidential elections.

More and more one can't help but wondering..do Republicans really want to lose?

There is no Rubio-Blunt amendment.

Not anymore! :lol:

There never was. I would link to it to prove it, but I haven't figured out how to link to things that do not exist in order to prove that they don't exist. You are, however, free to link to the actual Rubio-Blunt amendment if it does, or did, exist to prove me wrong.

Feel free to ignore the facts though, if it makes you feel smarter. Or, a novel idea, you could just admit you were wrong.
 

Forum List

Back
Top