the Rosenbergs really were Soviet spies

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Ninja, Sep 17, 2008.

  1. Ninja
    Offline

    Ninja Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,220
    Thanks Received:
    377
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Glorious People's Republic of California
    Ratings:
    +377
    Case closed: The Rosenbergs were Soviet spies - Los Angeles Times
     
  2. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,691
    Thanks Received:
    6,749
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,750
    I editted the thread title. Please keep personal attacks out of thread titles,or put them in the Flame Zone. There was absolutely no reason to put Jillian's name in the thread title of this article.
     
  3. Ninja
    Offline

    Ninja Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,220
    Thanks Received:
    377
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Glorious People's Republic of California
    Ratings:
    +377
    My bad. For the record, I wasn't trying to flame Jillian - I remembered a discussion from a year or so ago .about the Rosenbergs and a paper Jillian wrote in law school.
     
  4. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,444
    Thanks Received:
    1,107
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,144
    Probably, jillian was defending co-ethnics. If Jews murdered the Pope, other Jews would defend the act.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Anguille
    Offline

    Anguille Bane of the Urbane

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    17,910
    Thanks Received:
    2,120
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,121
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2008
  6. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    51,871
    Thanks Received:
    5,364
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    waterboard :lol:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Anguille
    Offline

    Anguille Bane of the Urbane

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    17,910
    Thanks Received:
    2,120
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,121
    Lol!
     
  8. jillian
    Online

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    53,485
    Thanks Received:
    10,013
    Trophy Points:
    330
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +10,335
    I remember that discussion, too. I was talking about the case from an evidentiary perspective.... since much of the conviction was based on testimony about a desk with a secret compartment which was never produced at trial. And much of the testimony came from Ethel's brother who, on reading the transcript, appeared to lack credibility. But Judge Kaufman was so afraid of weenies like WJ saying he was protecting a "co-ethnic" that he allowed a disgusting trial.

    It also now appears that Ethel's sister in law was the one who should have been put to death rather than Ethel. Ethel's own brother sold her out.

    And you should be really afraid of people who do things like that type of prosecution... because regardless of what actually happened, the trial was a sham.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. Anguille
    Offline

    Anguille Bane of the Urbane

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    17,910
    Thanks Received:
    2,120
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,121
    That's the most important thing to be learned from this.
     
  10. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    51,871
    Thanks Received:
    5,364
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    you bet--to hell with accurate history ! :lol:
     
  11. jillian
    Online

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    53,485
    Thanks Received:
    10,013
    Trophy Points:
    330
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +10,335
    what accurate history is that? that Ethel Rosenberg was basically killed by her own brother?

    Or that the nasty commie jew bitch deserved to fry?

    just wondering....
     
  12. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    51,871
    Thanks Received:
    5,364
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    that they were guilty
     
  13. jillian
    Online

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    53,485
    Thanks Received:
    10,013
    Trophy Points:
    330
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +10,335
    he...not she.

    And ends don't justify the means, in any event.

    The trial was an embarrassment.
     
  14. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    51,871
    Thanks Received:
    5,364
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    yes it was ---they should have been able to fry that traitor legally.
     
  15. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,691
    Thanks Received:
    6,749
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,750
    Good point.
     
  16. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,444
    Thanks Received:
    1,107
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,144
    Noam Chomsky said the same about the Nuremburg trials. "They had nothing to do with justice and everything to do with revenge," he said. And, he might not have objected to the revenge... just the perversion of a system of justice that supposedly categorically rejects foregone conclusions.

    Trials are for when you're saying "we don't know what happened here." War is for when you're saying "we've made our decision." So, maybe the Rosenbergs should have been deemed enemy combatants, I don't know.

    Anyway, they done it. They were spies for the USSR, they betrayed America, and Nikita Kruschev called them 'good comrades.' And they did so because as Jews, they were sympathetic to the Jewish-inspired project of communism, and hostile to the white gentiles who controlled czarist Russia as well as Mayflower America. They sought to destroy both, and they succeeded in time. Yet Russia flowers anew with a nationalism hated by Jews, and in America, skepticism of Jewish control over our foreign policy flourishes underground if not yet in the halls of power. En garde!
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2008
  17. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,691
    Thanks Received:
    6,749
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,750
    The Nuremburg Trials WERE a joke. They should have just cut to the chase and taken them all out and hanged them.

    The Rosenburgs -- whichever ones were guilty -- were spies for a nation hostile to the US; therefore, enemies of this nation who divulged classified information that eventually caused grave danger to the existence of this Nation. The penalty for treason is death. Joke trial or no.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page