The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide. Part I

Alexandre Fedorovski

Gold Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,536
1,161
210
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg
 
Last edited:
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg


~~~~~~
Hmm...., reads more like Adam Schiff's parody of the Trump - Zelensky telephone conversation....
 
what would happen if America never existed?
why do left wingers hate America so much?
is it another one of their racist things?
immigrationkqkjkjfkejkwjfekjfdfeggh.jpg
 
what would happen if America never existed?
why do left wingers hate America so much?
is it another one of their racist things?
View attachment 284389

Yes, many do not like us for our bloody distant, recent past and present. They do not like us because we stole the thesis from the Jews about their exclusivity and appropriated it to ourselves. The nation needs to repent ..

RowsonM1.jpg
 
what would happen if America never existed?
why do left wingers hate America so much?
is it another one of their racist things?
View attachment 284389

Yes, many do not like us for our bloody distant, recent past and present. They do not like us because we stole the thesis from the Jews about their exclusivity and appropriated it to ourselves. The nation needs to repent ..

RowsonM1.jpg
one of the greatest ways that you could repent would to stop enjoying the benefits of being an American and leave
 
what would happen if America never existed?
why do left wingers hate America so much?
is it another one of their racist things?
View attachment 284389

Yes, many do not like us for our bloody distant, recent past and present. They do not like us because we stole the thesis from the Jews about their exclusivity and appropriated it to ourselves. The nation needs to repent ..

RowsonM1.jpg
one of the greatest ways that you could repent would to stop enjoying the benefits of being an American and leave

I consider it my duty to educate people and fight the hateful ideology of part of the American political elite and population.

I see it as my citizen's duty protect Mr. President from the dirty and unbridled attacks of so-called "democratic" war hawks for avoiding military conflicts and killing both his soldiers and OTHERS

As for the "pleasures", it is unlikely that many Americans enjoy wild debts to banks.

As I see you belong to the most reactional part of the Democratic party - party of war, as once the Wall Street Journal stated...
 
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg
so, the NAs/blacks/Asians/Arabs/etc etc did NOT have moral monsters, misanthropes, killers and slave traders...?????!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahahahah
why pick on only Columbus? when there are thousands of others that did the ''''same'''
 
.....the NAs murdered/warred on/displaced/decimated/TORTURED/etc other NAs long before Columbus came along
..they did the SAME as he did
 
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg
so, the NAs/blacks/Asians/Arabs/etc etc did NOT have moral monsters, misanthropes, killers and slave traders...?????!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahahahah
why pick on only Columbus? when there are thousands of others that did the ''''same'''

Does it make us BETTER or THE SAME??? Crime is a Crime. I Criminal IS a criminal.

The foundation of the formation of our state is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Part VI "
Criminals As the Heads of the State or the Fish Always Stinks From the Head Downwards" is coming soon
 
Last edited:
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg
so, the NAs/blacks/Asians/Arabs/etc etc did NOT have moral monsters, misanthropes, killers and slave traders...?????!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahahahah
why pick on only Columbus? when there are thousands of others that did the ''''same'''

Does it make us BETTER or THE SAME??? Crime is a Crime. I Criminal IS a criminal.

The foundation of the formation of our state is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Part VI "
Criminals As the Heads of the State or the Fish Always Stinks From the Head Downwards" is coming soon
..obviously because of your OP, you think what the NAs did was not as bad--not the same
 
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg
so, the NAs/blacks/Asians/Arabs/etc etc did NOT have moral monsters, misanthropes, killers and slave traders...?????!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahahahah
why pick on only Columbus? when there are thousands of others that did the ''''same'''

Does it make us BETTER or THE SAME??? Crime is a Crime. I Criminal IS a criminal.

The foundation of the formation of our state is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Part VI "
Criminals As the Heads of the State or the Fish Always Stinks From the Head Downwards" is coming soon
..obviously because of your OP, you think what the NAs did was not as bad--not the same

Explain, please, your point
Killing even ONE innocent - is already a CRIME
 
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg
so, the NAs/blacks/Asians/Arabs/etc etc did NOT have moral monsters, misanthropes, killers and slave traders...?????!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahahahah
why pick on only Columbus? when there are thousands of others that did the ''''same'''

Does it make us BETTER or THE SAME??? Crime is a Crime. I Criminal IS a criminal.

The foundation of the formation of our state is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Part VI "
Criminals As the Heads of the State or the Fish Always Stinks From the Head Downwards" is coming soon
..obviously because of your OP, you think what the NAs did was not as bad--not the same

Explain, please, your point
Killing even ONE innocent - is already a CRIME
....please get back to reality ....you are a racist because you are condemning whites for the same thing the other races do
 
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg
so, the NAs/blacks/Asians/Arabs/etc etc did NOT have moral monsters, misanthropes, killers and slave traders...?????!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahahahah
why pick on only Columbus? when there are thousands of others that did the ''''same'''

Does it make us BETTER or THE SAME??? Crime is a Crime. I Criminal IS a criminal.

The foundation of the formation of our state is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Part VI "
Criminals As the Heads of the State or the Fish Always Stinks From the Head Downwards" is coming soon
..obviously because of your OP, you think what the NAs did was not as bad--not the same

Explain, please, your point
Killing even ONE innocent - is already a CRIME
....please get back to reality ....you are a racist because you are condemning whites for the same thing the other races do

Well, we'll deal with me later. So far we are talking about the United States of America, which position itself as the moral leader of the "free leader." The morality of the “fathers of the nation,” which covered the criminal taking of land from the native inhabitants of America, will be discussed in Chapter VI of this historical review.

The fact to what extand you do not like the historical Truth, how your grind your teeth in powerless malice, I know well ... But the Truth is above all...

19f24768caa4163e4b9881dc981a2d2e.jpg
 
so, the NAs/blacks/Asians/Arabs/etc etc did NOT have moral monsters, misanthropes, killers and slave traders...?????!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahahahah
why pick on only Columbus? when there are thousands of others that did the ''''same'''

Does it make us BETTER or THE SAME??? Crime is a Crime. I Criminal IS a criminal.

The foundation of the formation of our state is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Part VI "
Criminals As the Heads of the State or the Fish Always Stinks From the Head Downwards" is coming soon
..obviously because of your OP, you think what the NAs did was not as bad--not the same

Explain, please, your point
Killing even ONE innocent - is already a CRIME
....please get back to reality ....you are a racist because you are condemning whites for the same thing the other races do

Well, we'll deal with me later. So far we are talking about the United States of America, which position itself as the moral leader of the "free leader." The morality of the “fathers of the nation,” which covered the criminal taking of land from the native inhabitants of America, will be discussed in Chapter VI of this historical review.

The fact to what extand you do not like the historical Truth, how your grind your teeth in powerless malice, I know well ... But the Truth is above all...

19f24768caa4163e4b9881dc981a2d2e.jpg
....you are wrong from the start--the US does not position itself as a moral leader--that's total bullshit
 
so, the NAs/blacks/Asians/Arabs/etc etc did NOT have moral monsters, misanthropes, killers and slave traders...?????!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahahahah
why pick on only Columbus? when there are thousands of others that did the ''''same'''

Does it make us BETTER or THE SAME??? Crime is a Crime. I Criminal IS a criminal.

The foundation of the formation of our state is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Part VI "
Criminals As the Heads of the State or the Fish Always Stinks From the Head Downwards" is coming soon
..obviously because of your OP, you think what the NAs did was not as bad--not the same

Explain, please, your point
Killing even ONE innocent - is already a CRIME
....please get back to reality ....you are a racist because you are condemning whites for the same thing the other races do

Well, we'll deal with me later. So far we are talking about the United States of America, which position itself as the moral leader of the "free leader." The morality of the “fathers of the nation,” which covered the criminal taking of land from the native inhabitants of America, will be discussed in Chapter VI of this historical review.

The fact to what extand you do not like the historical Truth, how your grind your teeth in powerless malice, I know well ... But the Truth is above all...

19f24768caa4163e4b9881dc981a2d2e.jpg
it wasn't criminal taking--no crime
 
so, the NAs/blacks/Asians/Arabs/etc etc did NOT have moral monsters, misanthropes, killers and slave traders...?????!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahahahah
why pick on only Columbus? when there are thousands of others that did the ''''same'''

Does it make us BETTER or THE SAME??? Crime is a Crime. I Criminal IS a criminal.

The foundation of the formation of our state is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Part VI "
Criminals As the Heads of the State or the Fish Always Stinks From the Head Downwards" is coming soon
..obviously because of your OP, you think what the NAs did was not as bad--not the same

Explain, please, your point
Killing even ONE innocent - is already a CRIME
....please get back to reality ....you are a racist because you are condemning whites for the same thing the other races do

Well, we'll deal with me later. So far we are talking about the United States of America, which position itself as the moral leader of the "free leader." The morality of the “fathers of the nation,” which covered the criminal taking of land from the native inhabitants of America, will be discussed in Chapter VI of this historical review.

The fact to what extand you do not like the historical Truth, how your grind your teeth in powerless malice, I know well ... But the Truth is above all...

19f24768caa4163e4b9881dc981a2d2e.jpg
''powerless malice''--hahahahhahaah---more useless babble .....you are babbling and full of shit
 
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg





It is worth noting that the vast majority of deaths were the result of disease, so even if Columbus was a Ghandi clone, with a crew of Ghandi clones, all preaching love and shitting rainbows from their asses,


the death toll would have been about the same.
 
By popular demand, especially from abroad, I am publishing the first part of a series of articles entitled"The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide" which readers cannot find.

Part 1


Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.


christopher_columbus.jpg



At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

3.jpg





It is worth noting that the vast majority of deaths were the result of disease, so even if Columbus was a Ghandi clone, with a crew of Ghandi clones, all preaching love and shitting rainbows from their asses,


the death toll would have been about the same.

Your statement once again proves that the very possibility of killing OTHERS is quite acceptable in American public consciousness. Well, a place in paradise can be bought with indemnities in a Christian or Jewish (almost the same thing) church.

I traveled a lot, but nowhere met more hypocrisy than in America...Check your site - there may well rest the bones of the unfortunate owners of this land, from whom your ancestors not only took it away, but also life itself ...

images
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top