The Right To Bear Arms

Except that parents teaching their kids to handle guns is definitely not mentioned in the second amendment. Hell even if they do teach them there is no guarantee whatsoever that kid will heed the advice. Maybe It was bad advice to begin with. You all can’t take these anecdotes and apply them to kids in general. It doesn’t make any sense.
Parents teaching their kids not to yell "fire!" in a crowded theater isn't mentioned in the first amendment either, and even if they do, there is no guarantee whatsoever that the kid will heed the advice. Get the point? In case you missed it, the point is that we are EXPECTED to be adults and be responsible when we exercise our freedoms. If we have to have laws that state young children should not handle firearms without safety training and supervision, or laws that state young children should not yell "fire!" in a crowded theater, we're lost.
 
The Constitution is only "open to interpretation" by people trying to avoid its limits on government.
This is ignorant and wrong.

The Constitution is subject to interpretation by those seeking to place limits on government.

Indeed, that’s the purpose of Constitutional interpretation – to determine when government has acted in accordance with the Constitution or when government has engaged in excess and overreach contrary to the Constitution.
 
1704049373735.png


1704049449427.png
 
This is ignorant and wrong.

The Constitution is subject to interpretation by those seeking to place limits on government.

Indeed, that’s the purpose of Constitutional interpretation – to determine when government has acted in accordance with the Constitution or when government has engaged in excess and overreach contrary to the Constitution.
No. The Constitution IS NOT open to interpretation. Laws must comply with the clear language of the Constitution.
 
Well, for one thing, Jesus told His followers to arm themselves, so there's that...
Out of context IMO.
 

Forum List

Back
Top