The Right on Illegal Immigration.

Reagan gave the libtards the amnesty they wanted in return we were supposed to get border security. And, as usual libtards did not keep their end of the bargain. No more chances this time we want the damn wall.
Walls don't work. And they can be turned against you like the Berlin Wall. The real solution is to capture them and enlist them in special military units to be deployed abroad, like we do it here in France and call it foreign legion. That way the citizens may even get some use of them, indirectly.

Walls don't work.

Why not?

And they can be turned against you like the Berlin Wall.


Who was the Berlin Wall turned against?

Walls don't work, because if your salary is a national average of 25000 and your neighbor on the other side of the wall has a national average under a dollar a day, then they will percolate through the cracks, fly above, tunnel under, plus quantum entangle across.

And walls usually do turn against the people who build them, for example the Berlin Wall kept the East German locked up, from the day it was built. How long do you think an American wall will be before it locks up Americans? It is already a fact that walls are built on the Canada border, and those are built across backyards and town square playgrounds, between the US and Canada, not Mexico. This shows the real intent of American walls, and the ever more powerful American leftist neo Marxist power elite. Cherish your passport, ask what it means when you see a Russian.

And walls usually do turn against the people who build them, for example the Berlin Wall kept the East German locked up, from the day it was built.

The Berlin Wall wasn't built to keep westerners from joining the glorious people's revolution in East Germany. It it didn't turn against them, it always was against them.

How long do you think an American wall will be before it locks up Americans?


With millions fewer low skilled illegals streaming across our border, longer than without a wall.

This shows the real intent of American walls

What's the real intent?
The real intent is to tie the "peasants" down to the "rock" so they can't move. This is why they completed the wall on the Canada border but will not on the Mexico border.

The real intent is to tie the "peasants" down to the "rock" so they can't move.


I'm only interested in keeping the illegal aliens out.
Ping me when the wall is used to keep Americans in.
 
Walls don't work. And they can be turned against you like the Berlin Wall. The real solution is to capture them and enlist them in special military units to be deployed abroad, like we do it here in France and call it foreign legion. That way the citizens may even get some use of them, indirectly.

Walls don't work.

Why not?

And they can be turned against you like the Berlin Wall.


Who was the Berlin Wall turned against?

Walls don't work, because if your salary is a national average of 25000 and your neighbor on the other side of the wall has a national average under a dollar a day, then they will percolate through the cracks, fly above, tunnel under, plus quantum entangle across.

And walls usually do turn against the people who build them, for example the Berlin Wall kept the East German locked up, from the day it was built. How long do you think an American wall will be before it locks up Americans? It is already a fact that walls are built on the Canada border, and those are built across backyards and town square playgrounds, between the US and Canada, not Mexico. This shows the real intent of American walls, and the ever more powerful American leftist neo Marxist power elite. Cherish your passport, ask what it means when you see a Russian.

And walls usually do turn against the people who build them, for example the Berlin Wall kept the East German locked up, from the day it was built.

The Berlin Wall wasn't built to keep westerners from joining the glorious people's revolution in East Germany. It it didn't turn against them, it always was against them.

How long do you think an American wall will be before it locks up Americans?


With millions fewer low skilled illegals streaming across our border, longer than without a wall.

This shows the real intent of American walls

What's the real intent?
The real intent is to tie the "peasants" down to the "rock" so they can't move. This is why they completed the wall on the Canada border but will not on the Mexico border.

The real intent is to tie the "peasants" down to the "rock" so they can't move.


I'm only interested in keeping the illegal aliens out.
Ping me when the wall is used to keep Americans in.
By that time you will not have government permission to own a computer or a passport.
 
The only people who need to fear illegals are those whose job is being taken away.

And if your job is being taken by an illegal, then you have bigger problems than the immigration situation.
George Lopez said in a standup...."if an illegal is taking your job,it must not have been much of a job"....hey the predominantly Mexican audience was laughing....
 
I dont know where you've been but i've heard many conservatives,myself included,bitch about amnesty from both sides.
Just goes to show there is no difference between the parties and it's all about globullism.

Lol, really...sure, they bitch to appease their base and then do nothing. What about all those trips to mexihole that bush took....what do you think they talked about?
 
I dont know where you've been but i've heard many conservatives,myself included,bitch about amnesty from both sides.
Just goes to show there is no difference between the parties and it's all about globullism.

Lol, really...sure, they bitch to appease their base and then do nothing. What about all those trips to mexihole that bush took....what do you think they talked about?

Reading comprehension obviously isnt your strong point.....
 
[/QUOTE]
Walls don't work. [/Quote]

No?...then why is there a wall or secure fence or a combination OF the two, around every single prison in the world?
 
Last edited:
Ive been saying this for twenty years:build a wall wider at the base than the top from The Pacific to The Gulf. Electrified razor wire on top. A squad of military every 1/8th of a mile and they monitor the ground sensors to detect tunneling. End of problem.
 
No uncle terry. Some ppl believe and some dont but only ppl with minds like children laugh.
 
Reagan realized the problem of illegal immigration but he had to work with a Democrat congress. So he agreed to a bill that promised to secure the borders and stop the flood of illegals in exchange for granting a one-time amnesty to those who were already here.. as opposed to rounding them all up and deporting them. The problem was, after the legislation was passed, the next session of congress simply failed to fund the portion devoted to securing the border.

The Bush's were not Conservatives. They were Republicans devoted to crony capitalism and viewed illegal immigrants as a source of cheap labor, so they really didn't care about addressing the issue at all.

So there is your explanation.

yea, yeah, yeah. So what. Did he sign it or what? Huh? Did he sign it? Wul, did he?
And why would you make excuses for someone who fucked up?
 
Ive been saying this for twenty years:build a wall wider at the base than the top from The Pacific to The Gulf. Electrified razor wire on top. A squad of military every 1/8th of a mile and they monitor the ground sensors to detect tunneling. End of problem.


And then you can go play with your dollies and have more fun with imagination play time!
 
[/QUOTE]

Reading comprehension obviously isnt your strong point.....[/QUOTE]

...and politics is not yours.
 
No uncle terry. Some ppl [sic] believe and some dont [sic] but only ppl [sic] with minds like children laugh.


No one would accuse you of having a mind of any sort. Maybe if you ever get one, you can use it to LEARN ENGLISH.
 
Reagan realized the problem of illegal immigration but he had to work with a Democrat congress. So he agreed to a bill that promised to secure the borders and stop the flood of illegals in exchange for granting a one-time amnesty to those who were already here.. as opposed to rounding them all up and deporting them. The problem was, after the legislation was passed, the next session of congress simply failed to fund the portion devoted to securing the border.

The Bush's were not Conservatives. They were Republicans devoted to crony capitalism and viewed illegal immigrants as a source of cheap labor, so they really didn't care about addressing the issue at all.

So there is your explanation.

yea, yeah, yeah. So what. Did he sign it or what? Huh? Did he sign it? Wul, did he?
And why would you make excuses for someone who fucked up?

Whether he signed it isn't the issue. We didn't do what he signed. Had we done that it would have solved this issue and we wouldn't be talking about it anymore. The problem is, presidents have no control over what a future congress will do. And that is precisely why those on the right DEMAND that we secure the border BEFORE we'll even discuss any more amnesty.
 
Reagan realized the problem of illegal immigration but he had to work with a Democrat congress. So he agreed to a bill that promised to secure the borders and stop the flood of illegals in exchange for granting a one-time amnesty to those who were already here.. as opposed to rounding them all up and deporting them. The problem was, after the legislation was passed, the next session of congress simply failed to fund the portion devoted to securing the border.

The Bush's were not Conservatives. They were Republicans devoted to crony capitalism and viewed illegal immigrants as a source of cheap labor, so they really didn't care about addressing the issue at all.

So there is your explanation.

yea, yeah, yeah. So what. Did he sign it or what? Huh? Did he sign it? Wul, did he?
And why would you make excuses for someone who fucked up?

Whether he signed it isn't the issue. We didn't do what he signed. Had we done that it would have solved this issue and we wouldn't be talking about it anymore. The problem is, presidents have no control over what a future congress will do. And that is precisely why those on the right DEMAND that we secure the border BEFORE we'll even discuss any more amnesty.

So, what part did we not do?
 

Reading comprehension obviously isnt your strong point.....[/QUOTE]

...and politics is not yours.[/QUOTE]




Do you have any particular training, education, or experience in politics?
 
Reagan realized the problem of illegal immigration but he had to work with a Democrat congress. So he agreed to a bill that promised to secure the borders and stop the flood of illegals in exchange for granting a one-time amnesty to those who were already here.. as opposed to rounding them all up and deporting them. The problem was, after the legislation was passed, the next session of congress simply failed to fund the portion devoted to securing the border.

The Bush's were not Conservatives. They were Republicans devoted to crony capitalism and viewed illegal immigrants as a source of cheap labor, so they really didn't care about addressing the issue at all.

So there is your explanation.

yea, yeah, yeah. So what. Did he sign it or what? Huh? Did he sign it? Wul, did he?
And why would you make excuses for someone who fucked up?

Whether he signed it isn't the issue. We didn't do what he signed. Had we done that it would have solved this issue and we wouldn't be talking about it anymore. The problem is, presidents have no control over what a future congress will do. And that is precisely why those on the right DEMAND that we secure the border BEFORE we'll even discuss any more amnesty.

So, what part did we not do?

The border security measures in the legislation Reagan signed were never funded and never fully implemented. When Reagan agreed to a one-time amnesty it was with the understanding the border would be secured as well... but that part never happened. So now we have idiots like McCain and Rubio running around talking about "comprehensive reform" but we already tried that... it doesn't work. Democrats get their amnesty and little social goodies and then refuse to fund the security and enforcement measures.
 

Forum List

Back
Top