The Right Of Exclusion Law

DarkFury

Platinum Member
Feb 20, 2015
27,260
8,247
940
Sun, Sand And Palm Trees
Seems history and the courts have ALREADY dictated that YES an entire race CAN be excluded from immigration laws. This law used once before and found LEGAL by our courts was used to exclude Chinese from becoming citizens.
It was only repealed during WW2 because we wanted the Chinese to be on our side.

"The Chinese Exclusion Act was a United States federal law signed by President Chester A. Arthur on May 6, 1882. It was one of the most significant restrictions on free immigration in US history, prohibiting all immigration of Chinese laborers. The act followed revisions made in 1880 to the US-China Burlingame Treaty of 1868, revisions that allowed the US to suspend Chinese immigration. The act was initially intended to last for 10 years, but was renewed in 1892 and made permanent in 1902. The Chinese Exclusion Act was the first law implemented to prevent a specific ethnic group from immigrating to the United States. It was finally repealed by the Magnuson Act on December 17, 1943."

This law was the exclusion to the 14th written AFTER the 14th and upheld by the courts. This law also prevents anchor babies from being called U.S. citizens.

"For the first time, Federal law proscribed entry of an ethnic working group on the premise that it endangered the good order of certain localities. (The earlier Page Act of 1875 had prohibited immigration of Asian forced laborers and prostitutes, and the Naturalization Act of 1790 prohibited naturalization of non-white subjects.) The Act excluded Chinese laborers, meaning "skilled and unskilled laborers and Chinese employed in mining," from entering the country for ten years under penalty of imprisonment and deportation.[9][10]"

And this is key as well..

"Amendments made in 1884 tightened the provisions that allowed previous immigrants to leave and return, and clarified that the law applied to ethnic Chinese regardless of their country of origin. The Scott Act (1888) expanded upon the Chinese Exclusion Act, prohibiting reentry after leaving the U.S. Constitutionality of the Chinese Exclusion Act and the Scott Act was upheld by the Supreme Court in Chae Chan Ping v. United States (1889); the Supreme Court declared that "the power of exclusion of foreigners [is] an incident of sovereignty belonging to the government of the United States as a part of those sovereign powers delegated by the constitution." The Act was renewed for ten years by the 1892 Geary Act, and again with no terminal date in 1902.[10] When the act was extended in 1902, it required "each Chinese resident to register and obtain a certificate of residence. Without a certificate, he or she faced deportation."[10]"

Folks this has ALREADY been upheld by the Supreme Court.
"Supreme Court in Chae Chan Ping v. United States (1889); the Supreme Court declared that "the power of exclusion of foreigners [is] an incident of sovereignty belonging to the government of the United States as a part of those sovereign powers delegated by the constitution."

We HAVE and MAINTAIN FULL right of EXCLUSION to ANY country OR ANY race as set forth by OUR CONSTITUTION. What Trump is calling for is NOT breaking the law nor even bending it. What Trump is calling for is simply enforcing an EXISTING law.

Chinese Exclusion Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




 
Not gonna be a big hit now even with the xenophobes like you running around. No darkies doesn't play well these days, except among Trumpians of course.
 
One, legislation would have to pass Congress; two, SCOTUS would have to opine in the Affirmative; and, three, the minority and women voting electorates would have to approve.

None are going to happen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top