The righ put mothers on welfare

Discussion in 'Politics' started by LilOlLady, Aug 26, 2012.

  1. LilOlLady
    Offline

    LilOlLady Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,841
    Thanks Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Ratings:
    +761
    RIGHT PUTS MOTHERS ON WELFARE AND KEEP THEM THERE.

    Do you know how much welfare a mother gets for a child? If the Right stop doing away with government job training programs and subsidies for childcare, more women could get off welfare and work. the Right put them on welfare and keep them there. and then complain because they are on welfare?
     
  2. buckeye45_73
    Offline

    buckeye45_73 Lakhota's my *****

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    16,835
    Thanks Received:
    1,737
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +5,967
    You are a moron, democrats put them on welfare, they created the program, they attack business with taxes and regulation so it's too expensive to hire people, and they offer just enough on welfare so people wont take entry level jobs, to get work experience to get other higher paying jobs. It aint the republicans honey....but keep on trolling.....I love to ride you like national geographic wild animal.
     
  3. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    Mothers on welfare put themselves on welfare.

    They have every opportunity every one else has, instead they fuck their time away getting pregnant. They can't be bothered with getting a job, getting into a school training program, nor even going to school, but they always have time to fuck someone.
     
  4. bigrebnc1775
    Offline

    bigrebnc1775 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    64,004
    Thanks Received:
    3,798
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Location:
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Ratings:
    +4,830
    oh God you're stupid

    The Welfare Trap
    by Sheldon Richman, January 1997

    Welfare is much on people's minds. Last fall, the Congress passed, and the president signed, legislation that was heralded as a major overhaul of the welfare system. It wasn't, of course. It merely transferred to the states the power to run the welfare system, though the money will still come from Washington. Naturally, with money comes rules. The new federal rules include the requirements that welfare recipients get off the rolls in five years and find a job within two.

    That may sound like progress. But let's look closer. First, welfare is still federalized to a large extent because the money and the strings emanate from Washington. For reasons to be discussed below, welfare should be abolished. A good beginning would be for the federal government to get out at once. Second, the work requirement will cost the taxpayers lots of money. Contrary to popular impression, welfare reform will not save taxpayer dollars. To help welfare recipients get work, state governments will subsidize private-sector jobs, create make-work government jobs, and pay for health care and day care. After all, state welfare agencies are not going to order people to find work without becoming employer of last resort and providing various services to them.

    There's the irony. As Charles Murray has pointed out, if you make it attractive for people to get off welfare, you simultaneously make it attractive for others to go on welfare. Someone who has lost a job might find it worthwhile to sign up and let the state find her a new job within two years while providing such amenities as health care and day care. Some reform.

    http://www.fff.org/freedom/0197c.asp
     
  5. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    Before welfare can be even reduced, the people who are on welfare will have to make a decision that working is more beneficial than welfare. In other words, poverty should hurt enough to be an incentive. Good luck with that.
     

Share This Page