The RICH should be taxed at 100% - Fair is Fair!

[WillowTree]

For those who are willfully blind:

But as I’ve said before, we can’t just cut our way to prosperity. If we’re serious about reducing the deficit, we have to combine spending cuts with revenue -- and that means asking the wealthiest Americans to pay a little more in taxes.

Obama Says Americans Picked His Approach to the Deficit - Politics - The Atlantic Wire


Spending cuts AND taxing the rich more.

.

Have the demon raps told you yet what they are going to cut?

 

[jillian]

Lets take 100% of the income earned from wealthy Americans earning over $250k. A liberals dream right?

What happens then? Who's money could we take after the government is broke again after a few months?

When will the liberals acknowledge the fact that spending cuts need to be made?

i'm sorry, nutter, where on earth is anyone saying tax people at 100%? surely you know the difference between the tax rates before the bush tax cuts and after.

so given that you probably know those things, i think it's safe to say we can chalk you up to being a pathological liar.

thanks for playing.

Hilly Jilly Jilly. Tax em @39% federal then add in all the other taxes they pay what do you think that rate will be over50% how do you figure taking half of what a person earn fair?

it would be what i pay. *shrug*

seriously, why should someone earning their money by investing pay 13% while i work and get a salary.

do you really think 2% or 4% for someone who spends more on a bottle of wine at dinner than most people get in a week is going to hurt? do you think they'd even feel it?

at some point, people like you, like other working class people on the right, have to ask... why are you fighting to save some CEO 2% or 4% in taxes?

seriously, hon... it's at a level of absurdity that i can't fathom.

 

[g5000]

For those who are willfully blind:

But as I’ve said before, we can’t just cut our way to prosperity. If we’re serious about reducing the deficit, we have to combine spending cuts with revenue -- and that means asking the wealthiest Americans to pay a little more in taxes.

Obama Says Americans Picked His Approach to the Deficit - Politics - The Atlantic Wire


Spending cuts AND taxing the rich more.

.

Have the demon raps told you yet what they are going to cut?

Read the papers, fool. Read the legislation.

Learn for yourself, like I did, instead of drinking Fox's piss.


And I even put one of the Democratic cuts in all caps for you, you poor blind pup: DEFENSE.



.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid today revealed his own budget proposal, which would hand Obama the full $2.4 trillion borrowing authority he has requested—enough to last through the 2012 election—tied to $2.7 trillion in spending cuts that would leave Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security untouched. The plan does not attempt to raise new revenues: conservatives have been adamant that they will not vote for any proposal that raises taxes.

Harry Reid



It isn't that Democrats don't want to cut spending. It is that Republicans don't want to cut DEFENSE spending, while Democrats don't want to cut ENTITLEMENT spending.

Both sides want to cut spending, folks.

Wakey wakey.

.

They want to cut each other's spending but do not want to cut their own.

 

[g5000]

“I spent all week-end trying to work something out with the Republicans,” Reid said. “We are spending $700 billion dollars this year on the military, more than all of the other countries put together. You would think the Pentagon could chip in some bucks. Gates thinks they can,” he added, referring to former Defense Secretary Robert Gates. “But this week-end, lo and behold, Republicans wanted to raise money for the Pentagon.”

Harry Reid

 

[g5000]

They want to cut each other's spending but do not want to cut their own.

Exactly.

So now that we are past the lie that Democrats only want to raise taxes on the rich and not cut spending, let's move on.

.

 

[tooAlive]

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid today revealed his own budget proposal, which would hand Obama the full $2.4 trillion borrowing authority he has requested—enough to last through the 2012 election—tied to $2.7 trillion in spending cuts that would leave Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security untouched. The plan does not attempt to raise new revenues: conservatives have been adamant that they will not vote for any proposal that raises taxes.

Harry Reid



It isn't that Democrats don't want to cut spending. It is that Republicans don't want to cut DEFENSE spending, while Democrats don't want to cut ENTITLEMENT spending.

Both sides want to cut spending, folks.

Wakey wakey.

.

We need to cut both. Entitlements AND Defense.

Happy?

 

[WillowTree]

i'm sorry, nutter, where on earth is anyone saying tax people at 100%? surely you know the difference between the tax rates before the bush tax cuts and after.

so given that you probably know those things, i think it's safe to say we can chalk you up to being a pathological liar.

thanks for playing.

Hilly Jilly Jilly. Tax em @39% federal then add in all the other taxes they pay what do you think that rate will be over50% how do you figure taking half of what a person earn fair?

it would be what i pay. *shrug*

seriously, why should someone earning their money by investing pay 13% while i work and get a salary.

do you really think 2% or 4% for someone who spends more on a bottle of wine at dinner than most people get in a week is going to hurt? do you think they'd even feel it?

at some point, people like you, like other working class people on the right, have to ask... why are you fighting to save some CEO 2% or 4% in taxes?

seriously, hon... it's at a level of absurdity that i can't fathom.

Taxing them that 2-4% will fund your spending for 8 1/2 days. Then what will you do? Did you ask yourself that?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Hilly Jilly Jilly. Tax em @39% federal then add in all the other taxes they pay what do you think that rate will be over50% how do you figure taking half of what a person earn fair?

it would be what i pay. *shrug*

seriously, why should someone earning their money by investing pay 13% while i work and get a salary.

do you really think 2% or 4% for someone who spends more on a bottle of wine at dinner than most people get in a week is going to hurt? do you think they'd even feel it?

at some point, people like you, like other working class people on the right, have to ask... why are you fighting to save some CEO 2% or 4% in taxes?

seriously, hon... it's at a level of absurdity that i can't fathom.

Taxing them that 2-4% will fund your spending for 8 1/2 days. Then what will you do? Did you ask yourself that?

No, no they never do.. they live off Democrat talking points. Thus the utter ignorance of their assertions.

 

[tooAlive]

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid today revealed his own budget proposal, which would hand Obama the full $2.4 trillion borrowing authority he has requested—enough to last through the 2012 election—tied to $2.7 trillion in spending cuts that would leave Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security untouched. The plan does not attempt to raise new revenues: conservatives have been adamant that they will not vote for any proposal that raises taxes.

Harry Reid



It isn't that Democrats don't want to cut spending. It is that Republicans don't want to cut DEFENSE spending, while Democrats don't want to cut ENTITLEMENT spending.

Both sides want to cut spending, folks.

Wakey wakey.

.

They want to cut each other's spending but do not want to cut their own.

I can agree to that.

 

[TNHarley]

For those who are willfully blind:

But as I’ve said before, we can’t just cut our way to prosperity. If we’re serious about reducing the deficit, we have to combine spending cuts with revenue -- and that means asking the wealthiest Americans to pay a little more in taxes.

Obama Says Americans Picked His Approach to the Deficit - Politics - The Atlantic Wire


Spending cuts AND taxing the rich more.

.

Yea like we can really go by what that dumb fuck says.

 

[g5000]

1. Raise the Medicare and Social Security eligibility ages to 70. We are living longer, we should be working longer.

2. Eliminate all tax expenditures. You can't bribe a congressman with campaign cash to insert a tax expenditure as a rider on a bill if he is not allowed to do so.

We spend a trillion dollars in tax expenditures annually. Eliminating all of them would enable us to considerably lower tax rates, and it would broaden the tax base to include more than the current 47 percent of Americans who pay federal income tax, and thus more people would have skin in the game.

3. Cut Defense spending back to the pre-wars level.

.

 

[g5000]

For those who are willfully blind:

But as I’ve said before, we can’t just cut our way to prosperity. If we’re serious about reducing the deficit, we have to combine spending cuts with revenue -- and that means asking the wealthiest Americans to pay a little more in taxes.

Obama Says Americans Picked His Approach to the Deficit - Politics - The Atlantic Wire


Spending cuts AND taxing the rich more.

.

Yea like we can really go by what that dumb fuck says.

I seeeeeee....

The voices in your head that say Democrats don't want to cut spending are more truthful...

.

 

[tooAlive]

For those who are willfully blind:



Obama Says Americans Picked His Approach to the Deficit - Politics - The Atlantic Wire


Spending cuts AND taxing the rich more.

.

And then he gives another $6 billion to Asia for green energy development.

$6 billion? That's all you have in the face of trillions that have been put on the table to be cut by Democrats? Seriously?

I suppose you found it an impossible task to find $6 billion of waste in the Defense budget, right?


Naw. You haven't even bothered to look. You didn't even find that Asian green money. Someone poured that piss for you.


Wakey wakey!

Stop drinking the piss and start thinking about the good of the country.


.

My point is that he says we need to cut spending, and then stupidly goes on and spends some more.

If he really gave a damn about spending he wouldn't keep doing it.

 

[jillian]

For those who are willfully blind:

But as I’ve said before, we can’t just cut our way to prosperity. If we’re serious about reducing the deficit, we have to combine spending cuts with revenue -- and that means asking the wealthiest Americans to pay a little more in taxes.

Obama Says Americans Picked His Approach to the Deficit - Politics - The Atlantic Wire


Spending cuts AND taxing the rich more.

.

Yea like we can really go by what that dumb fuck says.

you're right... you must be way smarter than the president of the harvard law review.

okie dokie...

 

[g5000]

And then he gives another $6 billion to Asia for green energy development.

$6 billion? That's all you have in the face of trillions that have been put on the table to be cut by Democrats? Seriously?

I suppose you found it an impossible task to find $6 billion of waste in the Defense budget, right?


Naw. You haven't even bothered to look. You didn't even find that Asian green money. Someone poured that piss for you.


Wakey wakey!

Stop drinking the piss and start thinking about the good of the country.


.

My point is that he says we need to cut spending, and then stupidly goes on and spends some more.

If he really gave a damn about spending he wouldn't keep doing it.

And Republicans aren't appropriating money to our overseas allies right now? Are you sure they aren't wasting money somewhere?


.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

For those who are willfully blind:



Obama Says Americans Picked His Approach to the Deficit - Politics - The Atlantic Wire


Spending cuts AND taxing the rich more.

.

Yea like we can really go by what that dumb fuck says.

you're right... you must be way smarter than the president of the harvard law review.

okie dokie...

What was Obama, the smartest guy in any room's GPA again?

Give me a break... he's been sliding through life on minority & foreign student status his whole life.

He's a fucking dud who'd never survive outside academia or gubmint where there are actual standards and pressures to produce.

 

[tooAlive]

$6 billion? That's all you have in the face of trillions that have been put on the table to be cut by Democrats? Seriously?

I suppose you found it an impossible task to find $6 billion of waste in the Defense budget, right?


Naw. You haven't even bothered to look. You didn't even find that Asian green money. Someone poured that piss for you.


Wakey wakey!

Stop drinking the piss and start thinking about the good of the country.


.

My point is that he says we need to cut spending, and then stupidly goes on and spends some more.

If he really gave a damn about spending he wouldn't keep doing it.

And Republicans aren't appropriating money to our overseas allies right now? Are you sure they aren't wasting money somewhere?


.

Then those Republicans need to get their head out of their ass too.

 

[WillowTree]

For those who are willfully blind:



Obama Says Americans Picked His Approach to the Deficit - Politics - The Atlantic Wire


Spending cuts AND taxing the rich more.

.

Have the demon raps told you yet what they are going to cut?

Read the papers, fool. Read the legislation.

Learn for yourself, like I did, instead of drinking Fox's piss.


And I even put one of the Democratic cuts in all caps for you, you poor blind pup: DEFENSE.



.

So taxing the rich "just a little bit more" and cutting defense spending will solve ALL our problems.

 

[tooAlive]

Have the demon raps told you yet what they are going to cut?

Read the papers, fool. Read the legislation.

Learn for yourself, like I did, instead of drinking Fox's piss.


And I even put one of the Democratic cuts in all caps for you, you poor blind pup: DEFENSE.



.

So taxing the rich "just a little bit more" and cutting defense spending will solve ALL our problems.

We could cut defense funding entirely and the deficit would still be huge.