The real motive of the Democratic Party....Exposed.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by BrokeLoser, Dec 31, 2017.

  1. JoeB131
    Offline

    JoeB131 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    93,103
    Thanks Received:
    7,911
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
    Ratings:
    +19,986
    I understand their motivations perfectly well.

    Some rich assholes wanted to keep owning black people, and some poor assholes didn't want those black folks to compete for their jobs and fuck their women.

    They were true fuckups, and the sooner we teach little Southern Children this is something they need to be REALLY ASHAMED OF, the better.
     
  2. BrokeLoser
    Online

    BrokeLoser Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2016
    Messages:
    4,456
    Thanks Received:
    794
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    MEXIFORNIA
    Ratings:
    +4,831
    NEGATIVE...anyone working with an iQ over 70 and not paranoid of the truth knows that U.S. slavery was the best thing that ever happened to “Africans”....takes intelligence and balls to admit it to yourself....your sack will drop one day.
    Truthful, sane people with nuts teach their children that slavery was great for its time as was many other happenings in our history....shit, incest and cannibalism was very purposeful at points in history....that must scare the piss out of you...huh?
     
  3. bendog
    Offline

    bendog Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,930
    Thanks Received:
    2,412
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Dog House in back yard
    Ratings:
    +8,564
    We ain't gettin our slaves back.
     
  4. BrokeLoser
    Online

    BrokeLoser Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2016
    Messages:
    4,456
    Thanks Received:
    794
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    MEXIFORNIA
    Ratings:
    +4,831
    Huh?
    Atleast not Black one’s...We have a new stream of slaves...they’re just called illegal wetbacks and not slaves.
     
  5. Pogo
    Offline

    Pogo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2012
    Messages:
    81,385
    Thanks Received:
    12,788
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Carolinia Agresticia; the Forest Primeval
    Ratings:
    +38,766
    NO, I did not. If I did ---- quote it.
     
  6. Pogo
    Offline

    Pogo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2012
    Messages:
    81,385
    Thanks Received:
    12,788
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Carolinia Agresticia; the Forest Primeval
    Ratings:
    +38,766
    The Democratic Party, like many parties pre-Civil War (including the Whigs which is what doomed them), took no particular position on Slavery, trying to placate both sides. In other words ignoring the problem hoping it would fix itself. As a result a whole lot of nothing got done leading up to the confrontation, by both Whigs and Democrats.

    In the 1860 election campaign the South disrupted the Democratic convention (in Charleston SC) to the point where it had to be suspended and moved north. When it did it nominated Sen. Stephen Douglas as its candidate, who was still trying to placate both sides and predictably, pleased nobody. As a result Douglas placed dead last in the election in a field of four -- the South had run its own candidate John Breckinridge (who placed 2nd nationally) and the Constitutional Union Party (John Bell) -- an offshoot of the dying Whigs --- took 3rd place, winning Tennessee, Kentucky and Virginia. Breckinridge was pro-slavery, Bell, although he was a slaveowner himself, opposed the expansion of it.

    Douglas won a total of one state (Missouri, a 'border' state) and a split electoral vote from New Jersey. But in the states that would soon become the Confederacy he got exactly the same number of EVs that Lincoln did, which was zero. Lincoln at least had the excuse that his name wasn't on ballots in the South.

    Once that election was decided and Lincoln prevailed with the lowest popular vote percentage ever, due to the four-way race, Douglas worked with the President-elect to try to preserve the Union, going on a speaking tour in the South and, when that failed, advising Lincoln on how to fight them.

    And then when Lincoln ran for re-election in 1864 he took a Democrat for a running mate, collectively calling themselves the National Union Party.

    So no, it isn't that simple. Once again, False Dichotomy fails.

    The Whigs fell apart specifically because they could not come to consensus about what to do with Slavery. Some were for it, others against it. The latter contingent generally joined the then-new Republican Party, which is why the RP became at the time the "party of big government". They got that legacy from the Whigs.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. hadit
    Offline

    hadit Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    13,441
    Thanks Received:
    1,664
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,339
    True enough. Now why again did you involve yourself in this? Are you agreeing or disagreeing about the Nazis being a part of our history?
     
  8. Pogo
    Offline

    Pogo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2012
    Messages:
    81,385
    Thanks Received:
    12,788
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Carolinia Agresticia; the Forest Primeval
    Ratings:
    +38,766
    I never brought up "Nazis" at all. As you have now conceded. "True enough".

    I accept your concession, meaning as it does that you confess to having fabricated a fib in your mendacious bullshittery because you're a loser who made shit up and got busted on it and is now shamed forever and ever, world without end, amen.
     
  9. hadit
    Offline

    hadit Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    13,441
    Thanks Received:
    1,664
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,339
    IOW, you're making stuff up to feel better about yourself. So, since you seem so interested, are the Nazis part of American history or not?
     
  10. JoeB131
    Offline

    JoeB131 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    93,103
    Thanks Received:
    7,911
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
    Ratings:
    +19,986
    Look, while I'm sure incest is considered a good thing in the former Confederacy, most people realize that was wrong and so was slavery. I think what we need to do is have anyone who want to fly a confederate flag has to live one year as a confederate slave, with the whippings, beatings, overall disrespect for human life and the occassional sexual assault.

    If you can make stupid statements like the above a year after that, then you can have your confederate flag.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1

Share This Page