Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Answer? To what? To something I never argued and have no intention of arguing (ie. your tired strawman)?As no one is saying the spectra are something other than what they are, you are being irrelevant, as usual.
Strawman.
Gotta love your 'logic'.
Moron.
LOL. No answer, just ignorant yap-yap. Sure you are a scientist. And I am Paul Bunyan.
What part of the word 'irrelevance' has you so confused?
As you have not demonstrated even an ounce of logic, yet, I can understand why you are clueless about strawman fallacies, even when I used it in a perfectly defining context.
You continue arguing with yourself, though, and keep being irrelevant. You consistently haven't a clue.
You are a perfect clown, though.
So, let me get this straight: You argue your strawman - that folks are saying the spectra are something other than what they are; I tell you that no one is arguing that the spectra are something other than what they are; you come back and tell me I am ignorant and yapping for telling you that you're arguing a strawman (arguing something that no one is saying differently); then you post EXACTLY what I just told you - that no one is arguing the spectra - no one that I have ever seen.Papers on laboratory measurements of CO2 absorption properties AGW Observer
Papers on laboratory measurements of CO2 absorption properties
Posted by Ari Jokimäki on September 25, 2009
This is a list of papers on laboratory measurements of the absorption properties of carbon dioxide. In the context of these paperlists this is a difficult subject because only few of the papers are freely available online, so we have to settle on abstracts only (of course, interested reader can purchase the full texts for the papers from the linked abstract pages). However, I dont think that matters that much because the main point of this list really is to show that the basic research on the subject exists. The list is not complete, and will most likely be updated in the future in order to make it more thorough and more representative
Damn, you are one complete moron. You obviously don't even know what basic research is. You gave an example of content on an AGW site that explicitely states that the basic research on the spectra exists and you seem to think that proves that there is someone arguing that the spectra are something other than what they are????????????????????
You are a moron or on crack. I cannot see there being any other possible conclusions about your mental capacity, or lack there of. News flash, idiot: someone saying that the basic research exists on the spectra of CO2 does not mean they are saying the spectra are something other than what they are.
You clearly do not understand any content of what you read.
I fully understand that all you have posted is yap-yap about how illogical I am, without referances to evidence that the sites I have presented from scientific articles, a great many from peer reviewed sources, are incorrect.
Pretty much you are just a somewhat better spoken troll than KookyBill.