The question must be asked...

[Harry Dresden]

.your welcome....

Well, to return the "favor," i advise you to learn the difference between "your' and "you're"......LOL

the guy who cant spell "cross" giving me advice?....lol.....

 

[BULLDOG]

........takes the chicken shit route of blaming "BOTH SIDES"........

....and if you wonder why, its simply because many (not all) within his base are clearly home-grown terrorists and the fat orange clown CANNOT spare to piss off his dwindling base.

Exactly.

It’s also why most conservatives refuse to condemn rightwing terrorism: fear that to do so will cost the GOP the votes of hateful bigots and racists Republicans need to win elections.

Terrorism? They had a legal right to March , yea we know you snowflakes so desperately want to remove the 2nd and 1st amendment and be like Germany where people can get thrown in jail for just mentioning the Nazis ..

.

Yes, the racist Trump supporters had a legal right to march. The rest of the crowd had a legal right to march in opposition. That doesn't justify what happened in any way.

 

[JGalt]

I've moved on to making black humor jokes about it.

Go light a corss on your neighbor's yard.......It'll make you feel all "patriotic" inside.

Quit being a moron. I don't support the Klan, it's sacrilegious to burn a cross, and I don't have any neighbors.

 

[S.J.]

Leave it to a liberal idiot to equate Charlottesville to 9/11. Talk about a s-t-r-e-t-c-h.

 

[Wyatt earp]

........takes the chicken shit route of blaming "BOTH SIDES"........

....and if you wonder why, its simply because many (not all) within his base are clearly home-grown terrorists and the fat orange clown CANNOT spare to piss off his dwindling base.

Exactly.

It’s also why most conservatives refuse to condemn rightwing terrorism: fear that to do so will cost the GOP the votes of hateful bigots and racists Republicans need to win elections.

Terrorism? They had a legal right to March , yea we know you snowflakes so desperately want to remove the 2nd and 1st amendment and be like Germany where people can get thrown in jail for just mentioning the Nazis ..

.

Yes, the racist Trump supporters had a legal right to march. The rest of the crowd had a legal right to march in opposition. That doesn't justify what happened in any way.

Where was was the lefts permit????




.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is just like a gay parade , a women's March, a Mexican festival , a Muslim March or what have you, how many times you see the right protesting it in the past 30 years?

We just say whatever ( maybe laugh at them) and go on about our business.


.

 

[jillian]

........takes the chicken shit route of blaming "BOTH SIDES"........

....and if you wonder why, its simply because many (not all) within his base are clearly home-grown terrorists and the fat orange clown CANNOT spare to piss off his dwindling base.

Donald can't upset his white supremacists.

David duke made that clear

 

[nat4900]

Terrorism? They had a legal right to March

hey, fuck head, WHO uses a vehicle to plow into a crowd to kill others??? Are such bastards ISIS and/or KKK terrorists?...............Hint........ask folks in France.

 

[Slade3200]

Don't lie about what I believe. You have more than enough things to lie about to occupy your time.

What you believe is plain as day. I don't sympathize with the neo-nazi movement, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.

Historically leftists have a far larger body count than any movement started by some German paper-hanger. Six million Jews marched off to the gas chambers pales in comparison with the over 150 million people communism has murdered. You don't see that?

150,000,000 > 6,000,000 Simple math, you get it?

And don't tell me communism is different than socialism is different than Marxism is different than Democratic Socialism is different that leftism. They are all one and the same.

That last statement of yours couldn't be more wrong. That's like saying a guy that murders a woman is the same as a guy that rapes a women is the same as a guy that hits a woman is the same as a guy that disrespects a woman.... degrees matter. Stop conflating, it's dishonest and innacurrate.

Do you consider republicans equal to conservatives equal to anarchists?

No, anarchists are generally leftists.

But the general consensus among leftists here is that conservatives=Republicans=fascists=Nazis.

It's been stated that way many times.

Didn't you just call commies the same as socialists and leftists? You're just all over the place. How in the world do anarchists fit into your leftist logic? You were using the big vs small government scale weren't you?

Wikipedia seems to think so too:

"Anarchism is usually considered an extreme left-wing ideology"

Anarchism - Wikipedia

You do trust Wikipedia, don't you?

Im using your logic, which for the record I disagree with. Explain how communism and anarchism both belong to the left

 

[jillian]

........takes the chicken shit route of blaming "BOTH SIDES"........

....and if you wonder why, its simply because many (not all) within his base are clearly home-grown terrorists and the fat orange clown CANNOT spare to piss off his dwindling base.

Exactly.

It’s also why most conservatives refuse to condemn rightwing terrorism: fear that to do so will cost the GOP the votes of hateful bigots and racists Republicans need to win elections.

Terrorism? They had a legal right to March , yea we know you snowflakes so desperately want to remove the 2nd and 1st amendment and be like Germany where people can get thrown in jail for just mentioning the Nazis ..

.

Yes, the racist Trump supporters had a legal right to march. The rest of the crowd had a legal right to march in opposition. That doesn't justify what happened in any way.

Where was was the lefts permit????




.

"In some cases, government can require a permit as a condition of protest on public property. For example, government often can require a permit for parades in the streets, given the impact on vehicle traffic. Likewise, government often can require a permit for large protests in public parks and plazas, in order to ensure fairness among the various groups seeking to use the site.

On the other hand, the First Amendment generally bars government from requiring a permit when one person or a small group protest in a park, or when a group of any size protest on a public sidewalk in a manner that does not burden pedestrian or vehicle traffic. Such non-permitted protests might involve speeches, press conferences, signs, marches, chants, leaflets, expressive clothing, and efforts to speak with passersby. The absence of a permit for such protests simply does not burden any legitimate government interests. Thus, the Chicago Park District does not require a permit for gatherings in parks of fewer than 50 people. Likewise, the Chicago ordinance regulating public assembly does not require a permit for gatherings and marches on sidewalks that do not obstruct the normal flow of pedestrian traffic."

when-can-government-require-permit-protest

blah blah blah blah blah... defect deflect deflect

typical whiny little trump bitch

 

[Slade3200]

Wow, I actually agree with that statement unless we are talking about the federalism debate as I believe that states have the right to make their own laws if if they are contrary to federal laws within reason

We are talking about human behavior and the inclination of humans to be lawless and corrupt. We have several thousand years of examples. The Federal government does everything it can to take power from the states. State government does everything it can to take power from local communities, and so on and so forth.

The I'm going to get mine mentality has become deeply rooted in government, the law be damned.

So what are you supporting? central government rules all? States rights? Local government rights?

Damn if I know what the solution is to systemic corruption at all levels of government. Or the solution to the two parties who have so rigged elections that short of a billionaire running for office its damn near guaranteed that the bought and paid for party candidate will win.

Another comment I agree with you about. Something funky is happening today

Its really no longer Dem vs Rep, its the people vs the corrupt political class and their pals.

The answer in my opinion is in a serious reform to our campaign finance system. Gotta get big money and lobbyists out of the picture and let our leaders govern without the heavy burden of fund raising which seems to be much to high on their priority list.

 

[nat4900]

the guy who cant spell "cross" giving me advice?....lol...

YES........hitting the wrong key, VERSUS a moron like you who does not know the difference between a possessive pronoun and a combining of two words, you and are......

Let others judge.....

 

[Slade3200]

I don't hear the media or congressional leaders from BOTH parties calling for Trump to take responsibility. They are calling for him to give a clear and direct condemnation of the hate groups that instigated the violence. Why he tiptoes around this in contrast to how he handles other situations is pretty mind blowing

Course you're wrong. Mind blowing is ironic. Someone could show you a dog and you'd label it a rock if it satisfied your twisted mind, that's been thoroughly washed by liberal propaganda.

Would you care to make an actual argument based on facts or do you want to just throw out baseless claims and insults?

 

[nat4900]

Leave it to a liberal idiot to equate Charlottesville to 9/11. Talk about a s-t-r-e-t-c-h.

Another right wing scum bag who CANNOT comprehend simple English...EXPECTED, however...LOL

 

[jillian]

the guy who cant spell "cross" giving me advice?....lol...

YES........hitting the wrong key, VERSUS a moron like you who does not know the difference between a possessive pronoun and a combining of two words, you and are......

Let others judge.....

harry is good people. you can disagree with him civilly. he isn't a trumptard or a bigot.

 

[JGalt]

What you believe is plain as day. I don't sympathize with the neo-nazi movement, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.

Historically leftists have a far larger body count than any movement started by some German paper-hanger. Six million Jews marched off to the gas chambers pales in comparison with the over 150 million people communism has murdered. You don't see that?

150,000,000 > 6,000,000 Simple math, you get it?

And don't tell me communism is different than socialism is different than Marxism is different than Democratic Socialism is different that leftism. They are all one and the same.

That last statement of yours couldn't be more wrong. That's like saying a guy that murders a woman is the same as a guy that rapes a women is the same as a guy that hits a woman is the same as a guy that disrespects a woman.... degrees matter. Stop conflating, it's dishonest and innacurrate.

Do you consider republicans equal to conservatives equal to anarchists?

No, anarchists are generally leftists.

But the general consensus among leftists here is that conservatives=Republicans=fascists=Nazis.

It's been stated that way many times.

Didn't you just call commies the same as socialists and leftists? You're just all over the place. How in the world do anarchists fit into your leftist logic? You were using the big vs small government scale weren't you?

Wikipedia seems to think so too:

"Anarchism is usually considered an extreme left-wing ideology"

Anarchism - Wikipedia

You do trust Wikipedia, don't you?

Im using your logic, which for the record I disagree with. Explain how communism and anarchism both belong to the left

1. 1920 Wall Street bombing - leftist anarchist

2. 1910 LA Times bombing - leftists anarchist

3. 2886 Haymarket Riot - leftists anarchists

4. 1892 assassination of Henry Frick - leftist anarchist

5.1893 Barcelona opera house bombing - leftist anarchists

6. 1893 attack on the French Parliament - leftist anarchists

7. 1901 assassination of President McKinley - leftist anarchist

8. 1919 Anarchist bombing campaign - leftist anarchists

9. 1933 Chicago Mayor Cernak assassination - leftist anarchist

10. 1978 Unibomber bombings - Leftist anarchist

I could find more if you want or if you'd rather go ahead and try to dispute that these weren't "leftist anarchists". Either way.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Terrorism? They had a legal right to March

hey, fuck head, WHO uses a vehicle to plow into a crowd to kill others??? Are such bastards ISIS and/or KKK terrorists?...............Hint........ask folks in France.

I bet you laughed old goat when you saw this ....






.

 

[Wyatt earp]

........takes the chicken shit route of blaming "BOTH SIDES"........

....and if you wonder why, its simply because many (not all) within his base are clearly home-grown terrorists and the fat orange clown CANNOT spare to piss off his dwindling base.

Exactly.

It’s also why most conservatives refuse to condemn rightwing terrorism: fear that to do so will cost the GOP the votes of hateful bigots and racists Republicans need to win elections.

Terrorism? They had a legal right to March , yea we know you snowflakes so desperately want to remove the 2nd and 1st amendment and be like Germany where people can get thrown in jail for just mentioning the Nazis ..

.

Yes, the racist Trump supporters had a legal right to march. The rest of the crowd had a legal right to march in opposition. That doesn't justify what happened in any way.

Where was was the lefts permit????




.

"In some cases, government can require a permit as a condition of protest on public property. For example, government often can require a permit for parades in the streets, given the impact on vehicle traffic. Likewise, government often can require a permit for large protests in public parks and plazas, in order to ensure fairness among the various groups seeking to use the site.

On the other hand, the First Amendment generally bars government from requiring a permit when one person or a small group protest in a park, or when a group of any size protest on a public sidewalk in a manner that does not burden pedestrian or vehicle traffic. Such non-permitted protests might involve speeches, press conferences, signs, marches, chants, leaflets, expressive clothing, and efforts to speak with passersby. The absence of a permit for such protests simply does not burden any legitimate government interests. Thus, the Chicago Park District does not require a permit for gatherings in parks of fewer than 50 people. Likewise, the Chicago ordinance regulating public assembly does not require a permit for gatherings and marches on sidewalks that do not obstruct the normal flow of pedestrian traffic."

when-can-government-require-permit-protest

blah blah blah blah blah... defect deflect deflect

typical whiny little trump bitch

It didn't look like a small group of alt left trolls to me.....so you lie once again.


.

 

[LaDexter]

W was responsible for 911, along with Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Any statement to the contrary is accessory to treason.

 

[Peach]

........takes the chicken shit route of blaming "BOTH SIDES"........

....and if you wonder why, its simply because many (not all) within his base are clearly home-grown terrorists and the fat orange clown CANNOT spare to piss off his dwindling base.

Wow, comparing this to 9/11?

Both sides did incite violence. You faggot Antifa attack anyone that opposes them, there have been countless videos of it over the last year.

Any arrests from Antifa? (I realize that is a criminal gang, still, I have read no reports of attacks by members.)