The Purpose of Libraries

Annie

Diamond Member
Nov 22, 2003
50,848
4,827
1,790
Seems simple enough, but maybe not anymore. In my opinion libraries should carry the classics, whenever possible in hardcovered library binding. 'Best sellers' can have 1 or 2 copies, but should be rotated out on some cycle. There is no doubt that libraries are short of space because of computers and all, our town tripled the size of ours, but they can afford to. That's not true everywhere, but the libraries must remember what their role is.:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/la/?id=110009472

Checked Out
A Washington-area library tosses out the classics.

BY JOHN J. MILLER
Wednesday, January 3, 2007 12:01 a.m. EST

"For Whom the Bell Tolls" may be one of Ernest Hemingway's best-known books, but it isn't exactly flying off the shelves in northern Virginia these days. Precisely nobody has checked out a copy from the Fairfax County Public Library system in the past two years, according to a front-page story in yesterday's Washington Post.

And now the bell may toll for Hemingway. A software program developed by SirsiDynix, an Alabama-based library-technology company, informs librarians of which books are circulating and which ones aren't. If titles remain untouched for two years, they may be discarded--permanently. "We're being very ruthless," boasts library director Sam Clay.

As it happens, the ruthlessness may not ultimately extend to Hemingway's classic. "For Whom the Bell Tolls" could win a special reprieve, and, in the future, copies might remain available at certain branches. Yet lots of other volumes may not fare as well. Books by Charlotte Brontë, William Faulkner, Thomas Hardy, Marcel Proust and Alexander Solzhenitsyn have recently been pulled.

Library officials explain, not unreasonably, that their shelf space is limited and that they want to satisfy the demands of the public. Every unpopular book that's removed from circulation, after all, creates room for a new page-turner by John Grisham, David Baldacci, or James Patterson--the authors of the three most checked-out books in Fairfax County last month.

But this raises a fundamental question: What are libraries for? Are they cultural storehouses that contain the best that has been thought and said? Or are they more like actual stores, responding to whatever fickle taste or Mitch Albom tearjerker is all the rage at this very moment?

If the answer is the latter, then why must we have government-run libraries at all? There's a fine line between an institution that aims to edify the public and one that merely uses tax dollars to subsidize the recreational habits of bookworms.

...
 

Forum List

Back
Top