The Problem with Barack Obama... to me...

[G.T.]

Obamanation, Messiah, etc - all of which insult the idiots who blindly follow the man, not the man himself. Idiot.

"Idiot" --> explain to me how...............in the english language, calling Obama "Obamanation" does not insult him?

Then, I'll concede the "idiot" label. Otherwise, I'm guessing you might need to take the 3-second rule before you post.

 

[California Girl]

Obamanation, Messiah, etc - all of which insult the idiots who blindly follow the man, not the man himself. Idiot.

"Idiot" --> explain to me how...............in the english language, calling Obama "Obamanation" does not insult him?

Then, I'll concede the "idiot" label. Otherwise, I'm guessing you might need to take the 3-second rule before you post.

Obama nation. Those who follow Obama - Obamanation. Clear enough for you? I apologize if I'm too fucking clever for you.

 

[Ravi]

It's obvious to me that CG has a secret crush on Obama and is ashamed of herself.

 

[G.T.]

Obama nation. Those who follow Obama - Obamanation. Clear enough for you? I apologize if I'm too fucking clever for you.

Clearly you know this was a term often used in conjunction with abomination, I mean I "assumed" that you knew that since you obviously follow political messageboards and what-not.

 

[California Girl]

Obama nation. Those who follow Obama - Obamanation. Clear enough for you? I apologize if I'm too fucking clever for you.

Clearly you know this was a term often used in conjunction with abomination, I mean I "assumed" that you knew that since you obviously follow political messageboards and what-not.

My bad if I assumed that others would get what I mean. It's has, to me, never been an insult to the man.... always an insult at the borg-like followers.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Obama nation. Those who follow Obama - Obamanation. Clear enough for you? I apologize if I'm too fucking clever for you.

Clearly you know this was a term often used in conjunction with abomination, I mean I "assumed" that you knew that since you obviously follow political messageboards and what-not.

My bad if I assumed that others would get what I mean. It's has, to me, never been an insult to the man.... always an insult at the borg-like followers.

Of course trying to write off anyone who agrees with something Obama does as a "borg" is an incredibly childish, ad hom attack. I can only assume it means the name-caller doesn't have the capacity to actually debate the pros and cons of issues and lacking THAT ability they must resort to silliness.

btw - it's no different than liberals claiming conservatives are all in-bred ditto heads.

It just reflects the degeneration of political discourse and it's not just an insult to your ideological opponents, it's a roadblock to good government.

 

[California Girl]

Clearly you know this was a term often used in conjunction with abomination, I mean I "assumed" that you knew that since you obviously follow political messageboards and what-not.

My bad if I assumed that others would get what I mean. It's has, to me, never been an insult to the man.... always an insult at the borg-like followers.

Of course trying to write off anyone who agrees with something Obama does as a "borg" is an incredibly childish, ad hom attack. I can only assume it means the name-caller doesn't have the capacity to actually debate the pros and cons of issues and lacking THAT ability they must resort to silliness.

btw - it's no different than liberals claiming conservatives are all in-bred ditto heads.

It just reflects the degeneration of political discourse and it's not just an insult to your ideological opponents, it's a roadblock to good government.

Actually, that is my point. I don't use it to describe those who agree with something he does. I use it to describe those who just agree with him no matter what. There is a difference. Those who voted for him because they genuinely believed he was the right man I have no problem with. Those who voted for him because he was the black man, I have a problem with.

 

[G.T.]

My bad if I assumed that others would get what I mean. It's has, to me, never been an insult to the man.... always an insult at the borg-like followers.

Of course trying to write off anyone who agrees with something Obama does as a "borg" is an incredibly childish, ad hom attack. I can only assume it means the name-caller doesn't have the capacity to actually debate the pros and cons of issues and lacking THAT ability they must resort to silliness.

btw - it's no different than liberals claiming conservatives are all in-bred ditto heads.

It just reflects the degeneration of political discourse and it's not just an insult to your ideological opponents, it's a roadblock to good government.

Actually, that is my point. I don't use it to describe those who agree with something he does. I use it to describe those who just agree with him no matter what. There is a difference. Those who voted for him because they genuinely believed he was the right man I have no problem with. Those who voted for him because he was the black man, I have a problem with.

Nah, actually what he said has merit. It's childish, and you don't do it based on fact. You called me libtard with no fucking clue how I feel about social issues, judicial issues, fiscal issues, Foreign relations, etc. You can't not know these things and then label someone, as it were...................that's being a moron.

 

[California Girl]

Of course trying to write off anyone who agrees with something Obama does as a "borg" is an incredibly childish, ad hom attack. I can only assume it means the name-caller doesn't have the capacity to actually debate the pros and cons of issues and lacking THAT ability they must resort to silliness.

btw - it's no different than liberals claiming conservatives are all in-bred ditto heads.

It just reflects the degeneration of political discourse and it's not just an insult to your ideological opponents, it's a roadblock to good government.

Actually, that is my point. I don't use it to describe those who agree with something he does. I use it to describe those who just agree with him no matter what. There is a difference. Those who voted for him because they genuinely believed he was the right man I have no problem with. Those who voted for him because he was the black man, I have a problem with.

Nah, actually what he said has merit. It's childish, and you don't do it based on fact. You called me libtard with no fucking clue how I feel about social issues, judicial issues, fiscal issues, Foreign relations, etc. You can't not know these things and then label someone, as it were...................that's being a moron.

Actually, I called libertard and that was because you were whining. Libertards whine.

 

[Murf76]

My bad if I assumed that others would get what I mean. It's has, to me, never been an insult to the man.... always an insult at the borg-like followers.

Why should you apologize or explain? Why should you withhold your criticism or even your derision for Obama and his socialist supporters???
Why shouldn't you hate the guy in the healthy way I described earlier in the thread?

Shouldn't those of us who still believe in the Liberty, guaranteed to us by the U.S. Constitution, be passionate enough about it to vociferously condemn these fascist attacks on our freedom? Shouldn't we have the biscuits to boldly stand between the usurper of our freedoms and our families? Should we politely allow them to stick our children's heads in the yoke, to economically enslave our progeny?

I don't think so. Hate him if you want. Hate the looters who would deprive your children of their unalienable right to freedom. Emotions are our birthright as humans, each one having its own unique value. Don't forget that Love is as damaging as Hate when it's misused.

The only thing you owe these people is respect for their unalienable rights as citizens, same as you expect for yourself. In political terms, you don't owe them anything more than that. Political Correctness is the battering ram of the socialist. He uses it to diminish your will. But you aren't compelled to allow him to do it.

God, Himself, chose to allow us free will. Who among these calls himself God to take it from you? And if you're a Christian and you feel bad about hating your enemy?... pray for his soul and that God makes him right in his mind and actions. But don't forget that even Jesus doesn't require you to take a snake to your bosom.

 

[G.T.]

Actually, I called libertard and that was because you were whining. Libertards whine.

Your pussy-assed OP is a whine.

 

[nodoginnafight]

My bad if I assumed that others would get what I mean. It's has, to me, never been an insult to the man.... always an insult at the borg-like followers.

Of course trying to write off anyone who agrees with something Obama does as a "borg" is an incredibly childish, ad hom attack. I can only assume it means the name-caller doesn't have the capacity to actually debate the pros and cons of issues and lacking THAT ability they must resort to silliness.

btw - it's no different than liberals claiming conservatives are all in-bred ditto heads.

It just reflects the degeneration of political discourse and it's not just an insult to your ideological opponents, it's a roadblock to good government.

Actually, that is my point. I don't use it to describe those who agree with something he does. I use it to describe those who just agree with him no matter what. There is a difference. Those who voted for him because they genuinely believed he was the right man I have no problem with. Those who voted for him because he was the black man, I have a problem with.

So how to you determine which category a person falls into. Since your criteria is motive and since you can't crawl into someone else's head to REALLY determine motive, how do YOU decide who to hurl the name at?

 

[California Girl]

Actually, I called libertard and that was because you were whining. Libertards whine.

Your pussy-assed OP is a whine.

In your opinion, maybe. But to me it is a comment on the man who is our POTUS. The difference in his delivery between things he really believes in and when he is just going through the motions.

I'll guarantee him one thing.... If any harm comes to one more member of my family because he fucked this decision up... I will personally hound him until my (or his) dying day.

 

[G.T.]

Actually, I called libertard and that was because you were whining. Libertards whine.

Your pussy-assed OP is a whine.

In your opinion, maybe. But to me it is a comment on the man who is our POTUS. The difference in his delivery between things he really believes in and when he is just going through the motions.

I'll guarantee him one thing.... If any harm comes to one more member of my family because he fucked this decision up... I will personally hound him until my (or his) dying day.

They volunteered.

 

[California Girl]

Your pussy-assed OP is a whine.

In your opinion, maybe. But to me it is a comment on the man who is our POTUS. The difference in his delivery between things he really believes in and when he is just going through the motions.

I'll guarantee him one thing.... If any harm comes to one more member of my family because he fucked this decision up... I will personally hound him until my (or his) dying day.

They volunteered.

Really? I so did not know that!! Jeeez, you can be a fucking retard at times, GT. He hasn't sent the number of troops McCrystal wanted - therefore, if one of mine is harmed - I'm gonna hold Obama responsible. And I will make Code Pink look like a bunch of charming girls in comparison. I will make it my life's mission to hound him until he dies.

 

[G.T.]

Really? I so did not know that!! Jeeez, you can be a fucking retard at times, GT. He hasn't sent the number of troops McCrystal wanted - therefore, if one of mine is harmed - I'm gonna hold Obama responsible. And I will make Code Pink look like a bunch of charming girls in comparison. I will make it my life's mission to hound him until he dies.

Actually, you're the one sounding retarted and appealing to emotion. You don't know how many fucking troops we need because you don't have all of the classified intelligence to make these sorts of decisions and so logically you'd be talking out of your ass. Truth is truth, it doesn't matter what your name is. There's more that goes into these decisions than you or I are privy to, that's fact. Not fucking retarted, but cold hard fact. So blow it out your ass, with all due respect.

 

[G.T.]

Also, if McChrystal is satisfied then I guess you'd be arguing out two sides of your face on that one.

Yepp, unfound hatred of the man. Every decision he makes is going to be retarted to you. That's how haters roll. You're a hater.

 

[rightwinger]

Actually, I called libertard and that was because you were whining. Libertards whine.

Your pussy-assed OP is a whine.

In your opinion, maybe. But to me it is a comment on the man who is our POTUS. The difference in his delivery between things he really believes in and when he is just going through the motions.

I'll guarantee him one thing.... If any harm comes to one more member of my family because he fucked this decision up... I will personally hound him until my (or his) dying day.

Be honest with us

You will hold it against Obama regardless of how Afghanistan turns out

 

[California Girl]

Also, if McChrystal is satisfied then I guess you'd be arguing out two sides of your face on that one.

Yepp, unfound hatred of the man. Every decision he makes is going to be retarted to you. That's how haters roll. You're a hater.

McChrystal is stuck between a rock and a hard place - he's not going to dis his CiC in public. He knows how to play politics... sadly.

You're a fool if you honestly think I hate Obama.... but, at the end of the day, frankly, I don't actually give a shit what you believe I think. If you need to believe that I hate him, fine. It is of no consequence to me. It does tell me something about you.... other than being an idiot.... you also can't accept fact. If I actually hate Obama - why on earth would I not say so? You're a joke.

 

[G.T.]

McChrystal is stuck between a rock and a hard place - he's not going to dis his CiC in public. He knows how to play politics... sadly.

You're a fool if you honestly think I hate Obama.... but, at the end of the day, frankly, I don't actually give a shit what you believe I think. If you need to believe that I hate him, fine. It is of no consequence to me. It does tell me something about you.... other than being an idiot.... you also can't accept fact. If I actually hate Obama - why on earth would I not say so? You're a joke.

Because as long as you pretend here and there you're not a hater, you can lambast anyone who disagrees with you as a lefty partisan hack and look like you're not a hypocrit? Cynical plan, I must say.

And you're now basing your disagreement not on McChrystal anymore, but that you think McChrystal's playing nice now? Yea, you're actively looking to spin-up reasons to hate on Obama. I wouldn't point it out if it weren't truly there, and you prove it over and over again like you just did with your McChrystal comment.

If you're going to bust on Obama for not providing enough troops based on a McChrystal report, and McChrystal himself agrees with the new way forward, what...pretell, are you basing your negative feeling on besides hatorade drinking?

Hop off of his nuts, why don't you.