The President with the worst average unemployment rate since World War II is?

You have a long wait ahead of you. You don't have the balls to back up anything or answer questions, so as you know, your right to ask questions has been removed.

You actually think your teenage insults and internet macho act is good, don't you? You really do? Admit it, you think it's actually some good rhetoric.

Remember this classic?

Uh, duh, dar, you're gay, kaz.

Next post: You actually are gay, kaz, you're gay

I haven't heard wit like that since I was 13

Never said any of that. Not even close.

Are you confusing me with someone else again?

Probably Wry Catcher again. I can't tell the two of you apart

When YOU are the only one who has a problem, maybe YOU should work on it. Repeating the same error over and over isn't a good sign.
That is why the drive toward liberalism is insane. It has NEVER WORKED...and IT NEVER WILL. Take a long look at what liberalism has done to our big cities.....and states. They are fucked up beyond belief.

You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot
 
Never said any of that. Not even close.

Are you confusing me with someone else again?

Probably Wry Catcher again. I can't tell the two of you apart

When YOU are the only one who has a problem, maybe YOU should work on it. Repeating the same error over and over isn't a good sign.
That is why the drive toward liberalism is insane. It has NEVER WORKED...and IT NEVER WILL. Take a long look at what liberalism has done to our big cities.....and states. They are fucked up beyond belief.

You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot
W H A T????????

W cut taxes. That is NOT following Clinton's plan.

We had a BUDGET surplus.

I realize how embarrassing it must be for you that we had what you conservatives masturbate to - a balanced budget & then your party blew it.
 
Probably Wry Catcher again. I can't tell the two of you apart

When YOU are the only one who has a problem, maybe YOU should work on it. Repeating the same error over and over isn't a good sign.
That is why the drive toward liberalism is insane. It has NEVER WORKED...and IT NEVER WILL. Take a long look at what liberalism has done to our big cities.....and states. They are fucked up beyond belief.

You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot
W H A T????????

W cut taxes. That is NOT following Clinton's plan.

We had a BUDGET surplus.

I realize how embarrassing it must be for you that we had what you conservatives masturbate to - a balanced budget & then your party blew it.

If we had a "budget surplus," then why did the national debt go up every year?

A hint. Politicians lie.

And we haven't even started talking unfunded liabilities.

You don't know what accrual accounting even is, do you?
 
Never said any of that. Not even close.

Are you confusing me with someone else again?

Probably Wry Catcher again. I can't tell the two of you apart

When YOU are the only one who has a problem, maybe YOU should work on it. Repeating the same error over and over isn't a good sign.
That is why the drive toward liberalism is insane. It has NEVER WORKED...and IT NEVER WILL. Take a long look at what liberalism has done to our big cities.....and states. They are fucked up beyond belief.

You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot

Spin ^^^ won't turn. Clinton reduced the annual deficit. Thus the spin above is a lie by omission.
 
Probably Wry Catcher again. I can't tell the two of you apart

When YOU are the only one who has a problem, maybe YOU should work on it. Repeating the same error over and over isn't a good sign.
That is why the drive toward liberalism is insane. It has NEVER WORKED...and IT NEVER WILL. Take a long look at what liberalism has done to our big cities.....and states. They are fucked up beyond belief.

You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot

Spin ^^^ won't turn. Clinton reduced the annual deficit. Thus the spin above is a lie by omission.
Still, there was no surplus...as claimed by lying democrats.
 
When YOU are the only one who has a problem, maybe YOU should work on it. Repeating the same error over and over isn't a good sign.
That is why the drive toward liberalism is insane. It has NEVER WORKED...and IT NEVER WILL. Take a long look at what liberalism has done to our big cities.....and states. They are fucked up beyond belief.

You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot

Spin ^^^ won't turn. Clinton reduced the annual deficit. Thus the spin above is a lie by omission.
Still, there was no surplus...as claimed by lying democrats.
"I balanced the budget for four straight years, paid off $405 billion in debt." ~ Newt Gingrich, lying Democrat
 
That is why the drive toward liberalism is insane. It has NEVER WORKED...and IT NEVER WILL. Take a long look at what liberalism has done to our big cities.....and states. They are fucked up beyond belief.

You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot

Spin ^^^ won't turn. Clinton reduced the annual deficit. Thus the spin above is a lie by omission.
Still, there was no surplus...as claimed by lying democrats.
"I balanced the budget for four straight years, paid off $405 billion in debt." ~ Newt Gingrich, lying Democrat
Newt Gingrich has been a Republican for decades, dufus.
 
You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot

Spin ^^^ won't turn. Clinton reduced the annual deficit. Thus the spin above is a lie by omission.
Still, there was no surplus...as claimed by lying democrats.
"I balanced the budget for four straight years, paid off $405 billion in debt." ~ Newt Gingrich, lying Democrat
Newt Gingrich has been a Republican for decades, dufus.

Damn. I LOVE how stupid you are. It validates all functional retards.
 
W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot

Spin ^^^ won't turn. Clinton reduced the annual deficit. Thus the spin above is a lie by omission.
Still, there was no surplus...as claimed by lying democrats.
"I balanced the budget for four straight years, paid off $405 billion in debt." ~ Newt Gingrich, lying Democrat
Newt Gingrich has been a Republican for decades, dufus.

Damn. I LOVE how stupid you are. It validates all functional retards.
bhmvwg.png
 
Who cares? Presidents don't decide who works or who doesn't.

I'm just curious. Why would you average in the first month or 3 months or 6 months of a president's term implying that he had anything to do with that unemployment rate?
Figures you wouldn’t know that answer
 
Probably Wry Catcher again. I can't tell the two of you apart

When YOU are the only one who has a problem, maybe YOU should work on it. Repeating the same error over and over isn't a good sign.
That is why the drive toward liberalism is insane. It has NEVER WORKED...and IT NEVER WILL. Take a long look at what liberalism has done to our big cities.....and states. They are fucked up beyond belief.

You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot

Spin ^^^ won't turn. Clinton reduced the annual deficit. Thus the spin above is a lie by omission.

Wait, so when RealDave said there was a surplus, now a "surplus" means Clinton "reduced the annual deficit?"

:backpedal:
And I am the one spinning?

Sit down there, pardner, you're going to pass out
 
When YOU are the only one who has a problem, maybe YOU should work on it. Repeating the same error over and over isn't a good sign.
That is why the drive toward liberalism is insane. It has NEVER WORKED...and IT NEVER WILL. Take a long look at what liberalism has done to our big cities.....and states. They are fucked up beyond belief.

You mean like when you take office with a surplus on the way to paying off the debt & end with the worst recession in 60 years?

W did suck. What's funny is how W got us in a recession by following Slick's policies, then Obama fixed us by following W's policies. Leftists are bizarre people.

BTW, we never had a surplus. The national debt went up every year. And when you count it in accrual terms, it went up massively. You don't know what that means, do you? You need a Democrat to give you a talking point to parrot

Spin ^^^ won't turn. Clinton reduced the annual deficit. Thus the spin above is a lie by omission.
Still, there was no surplus...as claimed by lying democrats.

It's hysterical after changing the definition of "surplus" to "reduced deficit," he accused me of spining

:uhoh3:

And in an accrual sense, the deficit under Clinton was massive
 
Who cares? Presidents don't decide who works or who doesn't.

I'm just curious. Why would you average in the first month or 3 months or 6 months of a president's term implying that he had anything to do with that unemployment rate?

they average that in because they know it includes bush's crash.

but then again, the Obama deranged loons never do anything honestly.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Who cares? Presidents don't decide who works or who doesn't.

I'm just curious. Why would you average in the first month or 3 months or 6 months of a president's term implying that he had anything to do with that unemployment rate?

they average that in because they know it includes bush's crash.

but then again, the Obama deranged loons never do anything honestly.
Exactly, when they calculate Bush II's and Obama's debt they use the calendar year so Bush gets the Clinton budget surplus and Obama gets the Bush crash, but when they claim that the GOP National Debt never went down under Clinton, they suddenly abandon the calendar year for the fiscal year because in calendar year 2,000 the GOP National Debt went down under Clinton. Then the lying scum HYPOCRITES accuse others of moving the goalposts they just moved.

National debt for calendar year 2,000:
01/03/2000 $5,751,743,092,605.50
01/02/2001 $5,728,739,508,558.96
 
Shhhh! Moonglow ! Don't tell him that the UE rate dropped steadily while Obama was POTUS! It's a well kept secret!

Yes, people kept giving up on finding a job and dropping out of labor participation.

Every time someone stopped looking, you and your leftist brethren just cheered. And another one gives up! Bam!

Labor participation did nothing but fall under Obama. Good job on that. Socialist policies work!

And that's why Obama cut the unemployment rate from over 10 percent to 4.5.

Yes. People didn't find jobs, they quit looking. The labor participation rate kept dropping

Not so.

You're just factually wrong. Obama reigned over historically low labor participation rates
Kazzer.

The lowest the labor force participation rate ever was under Obama was still higher than it was prior to the mid-70’s. i.e., not historically low.
 
Yes, people kept giving up on finding a job and dropping out of labor participation.
There are more people not in the labor force now than when Obama left office.

Factually incorrect. It also doesn't contradict my point that labor participation was historically low under Obama which is what drove down the unemployment rate
Kazzer. Do you ever stop kazzing? Ever??

More people are out of the labor force now than when Obama left office.

1/2017: 94,364,000
2/2018: 95,012,000

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Or are you so brain-dead, you think 94 million is more than 95 million?
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top