The Phantom's "Quick" Look at the Polls

BluePhantom

Educator (of liberals)
Nov 11, 2011
7,062
1,764
255
Portland, OR / Salem, OR
Well it’s unfortunate that my life got too busy to continue my previous polling analysis thread, but I did want to pop in and give a breakdown of what I see right now from the numbers and what, at least I believe, should be taken from them.

Obama is safe in the following states: ME, VT, MA, RI, CT, NY, NH (yes NH….Romney isn’t taking NH), NJ, DE, MD, PA (yes PA…let’s be realistic here), DC, MI (Republicans can only dream that MI will flip), IL, MN, NM, CA, OR, WA, AND HI. That’s a total of 241 Electoral Votes (EV)

Romney on the other hand is safe in AK, AZ, UT, ID, MT, WY, ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, TX, LA, AK, MO (Yes MO…Dems can dream but Obama won’t take MO), MS, AL GA, SC, TN, NC (yes NC…again we’re being realistic and NC is out of Obama’s reach), KY, IN, and WV. That’s a total of 206 EV.

So let’s look at the states that are left and I will list them in the order that I am most confident to least confident about my predicted outcome. Keep in mind I am using the following as a basis for analysis

a) Current polling data from RCP which is easily verifiable by anyone

b) 2008 results indicate the best Obama will do in any given swing state

a. In 2008 Obama was riding a wave of enthusiasm and the electorate was furious with Bush and the GOP because of the stock market crash which happened right before the election. Obama cannot rely on that level of enthusiasm/fury this time and so we will use 2008 as the high benchmark because if that’s what he got in a state when everything was rolling in his favor he sure won’t do better with a stagnant economy , high unemployment, etc.​

c) Undecided voters usually break for the challenger as the election nears

d) Debates will likely favor Romney

e) Obama is currently experiencing a “post-convention bounce”, which is significant because this year the DNC came after the RNC so Obama’s position is fresher in the minds of the electorate.

So with those “established” let’s have a look.

1) Romney takes Florida (Obama 241 / Romney 235)
The RCP average currently has Obama up by 1.3 points. Considering point e above that’s pretty pathetic. Obama took Florida in 2008 by a mere three points (51% / 48%) despite everything rolling in his favor. For Obama to really be challenging in Florida he needs to be up by at least 5%, maybe 7%. When the debates get underway and as Obama’s DNC bounce continues to dry up (as it has been) Romney will gain strongly and score a pretty easy win.

2) Romney takes Virginia (Romney 248 / Obama 241)
In the last 10 elections Obama has been the only Democrat to take Virginia and he needed the perfect storm to do it. There is a legitimate argument that the demographics of Virginia have changed and it’s solidly a “purple state” now. In 2008 Virginia pulled out a 53% / 46% win but the current RCP average is Obama +0.3%. Go re-read the notes on Florida.

3) Obama takes Nevada (Romney 248 / Obama 247)
Obama scored a 13 point win in 2008. The most recent data in Nevada is way out of date. In late August it was Obama by 3.3%. Right now my guess is that it’s more like 6% - 7%. What will tell the tale is Reno. Vegas is primarily liberal and the rest of the state is Republican. Reno is kind of in the middle and that’s where the state will be won or lost. Now in elections since 2008 Reno has gone strongly Republican indicating that Romney has a chance to take the state back. I just don’t see it. It sure as hell won’t be the 13 point whopping Obama delivered in 2008, but I imagine Obama will manage to pull off a victory by maybe 2% - 3%.

4) Romney takes Iowa (Romney 254 / Obama 247)
Iowa is a tough one that really flips back and forth. Obama scored a strong 10 point win in 2008 54% / 44% but the most recent polling has Obama +0.2%. Granted that data is pretty old so it’s reasonable to assume that since the DNC Obama has picked up points and it’s probably more like Obama +3% now. Still it’s not enough. With nearly 10% undecided or favoring a third candidate (according to the average) and keeping point c in mind all signs suggest that Romney will squeak out a narrow victory by a point or two. This is a tough one to call because the data is so old.

5) Romney takes Ohio (Romney 272 / Obama 247)
The current RCP average has Obama +4.2. In my opinion it’s probably no more than Obama +3, maybe even 2%. There are two polls in the current average (PPP(D) and Marist) that totally suck and demonstrate massive Obama bias and that is skewing the numbers. Obama took Ohio 52% / 47% in 2008. Even if we accept 4.2% as the current number it’s probably not enough to seal the deal when you consider a 4 point advantage while experiencing a bounce of roughly 5% is not good news for team Obama. Add in Romney’s closing favorables in points c and d and it’s looking like Romney wins a squeaker.

6) Romney takes Colorado (Romney 281 / Obama 247)
You can pretty much take my comments for Ohio and insert them here. The current RCP average is being skewed by two Democratic agencies (PPP and Project New America [a polling firm run by David Axelrod’s son]). SUSA has it at 1 point and they are a pretty solid firm to look at. Obama scored a 9 point win in 2008 but consider point b above. He was riding a tidal wave. Historically Colorado is a pretty safe red state and my guess is that it will return in 2012.

7) Obama takes Wisconsin (Romney 281 / Obama 257)
Boy it’s close in Wisconsin. It’s reasonable to look at my previous analyses and say “well the RCP average only has Obama +1.4 and you have said previously that that spread in a post convention bounce is not enough”. You could argue that Wisconsin is experiencing a pretty strong GOP wave since 2010 and that Democratic victories in Presidential elections in 2004 and 2000 were razor thin. You could argue that Obama’s 14 point massacre of McCain in 2008 was a result of the tidal wave he was experiencing at the time. Yeah…that’s all true and that’s why I have this prediction as my least confident call. All signs are pointing to Romney flipping the state, but there’s just something in my gut that is telling me to be very careful about making that call right now. Perhaps as the election gets closer I will be more confident in making that prediction, but right now I am sticking with history and predicting another razor thin Obama victory in Wisconsin.


So at the end of the day what it really comes down to is Ohio….nothing new there really. That’s pretty much how it usually goes and this year is shaping up to be no different. Now it is worth nothing that if Obama holds on in Ohio and Romney takes Nevada we have a 269 / 269 tie and a tie favors Romney since the House breaks the tie and the House is controlled by the GOP. So a tie essentially means a Romney victory. And of course Romney could lose Ohio and still win by taking WI and NV but I think that would be a pretty bold prediction.

Anyhow…there it is. The point of course is that right now we’re seeing a lot of Democrats that are incredibly excited about the current data but they are not putting it into context of what is happening to create Obama’s current leads and they are ignoring that between now and election day Romney’s favorables dramatically outweigh Obama’s. Romney should close at least 5% maybe even 7% between now and then in some states. If I were a liberal that’s not a situation I would be very thrilled about.
 
Why do you think your fantasies deserve a bump.

The RCP Averages state by state show Obama leading in every "Swing" state except North Carolina.

And that was before Romney totally stuck his foot in his mouth over Libya.
 
You took way too long to say what I said in few sentences yesterday. Obama need only win what Kerry won in 2004,

plus Ohio.

Obama is well ahead in Ohio.

How is PPP poll flawed?
 
OK, if we're doing BluePhantom style analysis of the polls, let's look at the latest Monmouth University Poll,

in association with SurveyUSA, BluePhantom's favorite pollster.

LIKELY VOTERS

Obama 48 Romney 45

On the issues:

Economy and jobs - Obama +3

Social Security and Medicare - Obama +8

Budget and Natl Debt - Tied

Foreign Policy - Obama +9

------

Sampling:

35% Democrat 31% Republican. That happens to be about 1/2 the gap of the 2008 election.

Any questions?

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/84/159/2147483694/31a5695e-db0d-4272-b292-b9640f4ff7fb.pdf
 
OK, if we're doing BluePhantom style analysis of the polls, let's look at the latest Monmouth University Poll,

in association with SurveyUSA, BluePhantom's favorite pollster.

LIKELY VOTERS

Obama 48 Romney 45

On the issues:

Economy and jobs - Obama +3

Social Security and Medicare - Obama +8

Budget and Natl Debt - Tied

Foreign Policy - Obama +9

------

Sampling:

35% Democrat 31% Republican. That happens to be about 1/2 the gap of the 2008 election.

Any questions?

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/84/159/2147483694/31a5695e-db0d-4272-b292-b9640f4ff7fb.pdf

Foreign policy - Obama +9 :lmao: Economy and jobs - Obama +3 :lmao:
 
Last edited:
OK, if we're doing BluePhantom style analysis of the polls, let's look at the latest Monmouth University Poll,

in association with SurveyUSA, BluePhantom's favorite pollster.

LIKELY VOTERS

Obama 48 Romney 45

On the issues:

Economy and jobs - Obama +3

Social Security and Medicare - Obama +8

Budget and Natl Debt - Tied

Foreign Policy - Obama +9

------

Sampling:

35% Democrat 31% Republican. That happens to be about 1/2 the gap of the 2008 election.

Any questions?

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/84/159/2147483694/31a5695e-db0d-4272-b292-b9640f4ff7fb.pdf

Foreign policy - Obama +9 :lmao: Economy and jobs - Obama +3 :lmao:

SUSA is very solid usually but it's always important to remember that results can change when the poll is done in association. The poll being cited is a Monmouth poll in association with SUSA and Braun...not performed by SUSA alone. We see similar things with Quinnapiac who is another source that has been very historically accurate. When Quinnapiac or SUSA poll by themselves you see one trend in their results and when they do it in association with someone else the trend can change significantly.

Regardless, as usual Carbineer chooses to cherry pick specific polls that happen to support his political agenda rather than looking at the polls as a whole. Pretty typical for him and a typical error/tactic of the novice poll watcher.
 
Last edited:
hmm...I will give this the rare bump. I figured I would get some kind of response. :lol:

I appreciate your thoughtful posts but I think your bias is showing. I'm in Florida, and I see nothing to substantiate your logic that Obama has to be up 5-7 points. Given the history of this state, there is no reason to assume that Obama will naturally slip by that many points. FL is going to be a 2% swing state one way or the other.
 
hmm...I will give this the rare bump. I figured I would get some kind of response. :lol:

I appreciate your thoughtful posts but I think your bias is showing. I'm in Florida, and I see nothing to substantiate your logic that Obama has to be up 5-7 points. Given the history of this state, there is no reason to assume that Obama will naturally slip by that many points. FL is going to be a 2% swing state one way or the other.

I am willing to accept that my biases may be clouding my judgement. Certainly possible and as you are a Floridian I will certainly defer to your knowledge of the state over my own (since I live in Oregon). However even if we use your 2% standard Obama is still in deep shit since we are talking about a 1.3% - 1.4% spread according to the current averages.

Certainly you are not going to argue that Romney will not close ground between now and election day
 
You took way too long to say what I said in few sentences yesterday. Obama need only win what Kerry won in 2004,

plus Ohio.

Obama is well ahead in Ohio.

How is PPP poll flawed?

Obama has a huge advantage in Ohio. When push comes to shove, Ohioans know Obama is responsible for keeping GM and Chrysler alive, and that has been a very good thing for Ohio's economy. Anyone who states otherwise is just clueless.
 
hmm...I will give this the rare bump. I figured I would get some kind of response. :lol:

I appreciate your thoughtful posts but I think your bias is showing. I'm in Florida, and I see nothing to substantiate your logic that Obama has to be up 5-7 points. Given the history of this state, there is no reason to assume that Obama will naturally slip by that many points. FL is going to be a 2% swing state one way or the other.

I am willing to accept that my biases may be clouding my judgement. Certainly possible and as you are a Floridian I will certainly defer to your knowledge of the state over my own (since I live in Oregon). However even if we use your 2% standard Obama is still in deep shit since we are talking about a 1.3% - 1.4% spread according to the current averages.

Certainly you are not going to argue that Romney will not close ground between now and election day

Whether or not Romney closes ground is really a crap shoot. Without a doubt he could, but it is also just as likely that it moves in the other direction and Obama's lead actually widens. I'm certainly not going to make any crazy predictions other than to say I would be shocked if Romney wins Ohio, and I think her really has to have Ohio to win.
 
OK, if we're doing BluePhantom style analysis of the polls, let's look at the latest Monmouth University Poll,

in association with SurveyUSA, BluePhantom's favorite pollster.

LIKELY VOTERS

Obama 48 Romney 45

On the issues:

Economy and jobs - Obama +3

Social Security and Medicare - Obama +8

Budget and Natl Debt - Tied

Foreign Policy - Obama +9

------

Sampling:

35% Democrat 31% Republican. That happens to be about 1/2 the gap of the 2008 election.

Any questions?

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/84/159/2147483694/31a5695e-db0d-4272-b292-b9640f4ff7fb.pdf

Foreign policy - Obama +9 :lmao: Economy and jobs - Obama +3 :lmao:

SUSA is very solid usually but it's always important to remember that results can change when the poll is done in association. The poll being cited is a Monmouth poll in association with SUSA and Braun...not performed by SUSA alone. We see similar things with Quinnapiac who is another source that has been very historically accurate. When Quinnapiac or SUSA poll by themselves you see one trend in their results and when they do it in association with someone else the trend can change significantly.

Regardless, as usual Carbineer chooses to cherry pick specific polls that happen to support his political agenda rather than looking at the polls as a whole. Pretty typical for him and a typical error/tactic of the novice poll watcher.

I added it because you cherry picked and chose to leave it out.

I also added it to see how you would go about throwing your old favorite under the bus.
 
You took way too long to say what I said in few sentences yesterday. Obama need only win what Kerry won in 2004,

plus Ohio.

Obama is well ahead in Ohio.

How is PPP poll flawed?

See, no answer on HOW the PPP poll is flawed. The OP just throws it out there, with nothing of substance to back it up,

and then the sheep come in and say 'oh my, great analysis'. Great my ass.
 
You took way too long to say what I said in few sentences yesterday. Obama need only win what Kerry won in 2004,

plus Ohio.

Obama is well ahead in Ohio.

How is PPP poll flawed?

See, no answer on HOW the PPP poll is flawed. The OP just throws it out there, with nothing of substance to back it up,

and then the sheep come in and say 'oh my, great analysis'. Great my ass.

Eat s**t.

You do this all the time.

Hypocrite.
 
I appreciate your thoughtful posts but I think your bias is showing. I'm in Florida, and I see nothing to substantiate your logic that Obama has to be up 5-7 points. Given the history of this state, there is no reason to assume that Obama will naturally slip by that many points. FL is going to be a 2% swing state one way or the other.

I am willing to accept that my biases may be clouding my judgement. Certainly possible and as you are a Floridian I will certainly defer to your knowledge of the state over my own (since I live in Oregon). However even if we use your 2% standard Obama is still in deep shit since we are talking about a 1.3% - 1.4% spread according to the current averages.

Certainly you are not going to argue that Romney will not close ground between now and election day

Whether or not Romney closes ground is really a crap shoot. Without a doubt he could, but it is also just as likely that it moves in the other direction and Obama's lead actually widens. I'm certainly not going to make any crazy predictions other than to say I would be shocked if Romney wins Ohio, and I think her really has to have Ohio to win.

Well anything is possible. I am just going by history. Historically the challenger closes ground as the election nears. Historically undecided voters break for the challenger. Historically the challenger picks up ground in the debates since everyone pretty much knows the incumbent's position and the challenger has a better chance to influence voters to his side. Historically, all things point to Romney closing some ground. I am certainly willing to concede that this year may be different, but I don't see what Obama has in his corner to avoid a repeat of history.
 
You took way too long to say what I said in few sentences yesterday. Obama need only win what Kerry won in 2004,

plus Ohio.

Obama is well ahead in Ohio.

How is PPP poll flawed?

See, no answer on HOW the PPP poll is flawed. The OP just throws it out there, with nothing of substance to back it up,

and then the sheep come in and say 'oh my, great analysis'. Great my ass.

Eat s**t.

You do this all the time.

Hypocrite.

:lol: Actually there was no response to his question because I never saw it. I have him on ignore. :rofl:
 

Forum List

Back
Top