Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Only that is is only concerned with the success of the corporations and dosent care much for the American people.
You do realize that people create, are employed by, and make a living through the corporate structure dont you? You do realize that you cant attack corporations without attacking the people who make it up dont you?
Who doesnt care much for the American people? Those employing them or those going to extreme lengths to attack those that employ them?
Only that is is only concerned with the success of the corporations and dosent care much for the American people.
You do realize that people create, are employed by, and make a living through the corporate structure dont you? You do realize that you cant attack corporations without attacking the people who make it up dont you?
Who doesnt care much for the American people? Those employing them or those going to extreme lengths to attack those that employ them?
Use starving women and children as a shield why don't you?
Sheesh...
You mean besides it's unholy alliance with government?
Yes there are but not anything that cannot be addressed with a heapin' helpin' of sound free market principles, which could have been accomplished over the last 2 years if certain firms on Wall Street hadn't gotten bailed out with taxpayer money by their politician puppets in Washington.
What was the American economy like when there were only free market principles guiding wall street?
Apparently you're unable to differentiate between "sound" and "only" ... they are in fact two distinct words with totally unrelated meanings.
That being said, the condition of "Wall Street" was fine when it was largely confined to the constraints of a free, fair and open marketplace, it's only gotten out of control when it's been allowed to co-opt the services of a federal government that is no longer constrained by the U.S. Constitution. I realize that you central planning advocates find it hard to grasp that the marketplace is a much harder taskmaster on market participants than government but history strongly suggests that it is and recent events only reinforce that hypothesis.
Please explain where I made any inference that the two were conceptually any different or that I was an advocate of the Medicare Program.
Corps can make profit and not screw us , IT IS POSSIBLE.
Total strawman bullshit, no one has advocated "free markets with no 'restaints' in place".What was the American economy like when there were only free market principles guiding wall street?
Apparently you're unable to differentiate between "sound" and "only" ... they are in fact two distinct words with totally unrelated meanings.
That being said, the condition of "Wall Street" was fine when it was largely confined to the constraints of a free, fair and open marketplace, it's only gotten out of control when it's been allowed to co-opt the services of a federal government that is no longer constrained by the U.S. Constitution. I realize that you central planning advocates find it hard to grasp that the marketplace is a much harder taskmaster on market participants than government but history strongly suggests that it is and recent events only reinforce that hypothesis.
No it is not.
History has proven what happens to free markets with no restaints in place.
You're the one that appears to be ignoring it and if I may be so bold as to point it out, you seem ignore it quite regularly and often quite selectively.You can ignore or distort history all you want ,
LOL, who exactly are "the misers" and who made any mention of Ron Paul ? Do you get this nonsense from the voices in your head or does the Democratic Party just beam it directly into your brain from DNC headquarters?just dont expect sane people to buy the misers and ron paul crap.
Only that is is only concerned with the success of the corporations and dosent care much for the American people.
You do realize that people create, are employed by, and make a living through the corporate structure dont you? You do realize that you cant attack corporations without attacking the people who make it up dont you?
Who doesnt care much for the American people? Those employing them or those going to extreme lengths to attack those that employ them?
ATTACK???????
I just want the corps regulated so they cant pull this "profit for me right now" over the long term economy crap.
Its not about killing the corporations its about reforming who wants to be their CEOs.
You see if you make it take a different tact you will get different leaders in place.
Corps can make profit and not screw us , IT IS POSSIBLE.
"Singling me out" would be inappropriate since I'm neither a fan of Bush (ANY of the Bush clan) or Republicans.Please explain where I made any inference that the two were conceptually any different or that I was an advocate of the Medicare Program.
not trying to single you out, just think it's ridiculous to see Republicans screaming about socialized medicine when Bush did more for that cause than anyone since LBJ, and worse, didn't pay for it
Yes except the proposal to cut $400 billion in Medicare was idiotic since it was tied to the comprehensive health care reform monstrosities that Congress was attempting to use smoke & mirrors to fund. If there is indeed $400 billion of Medicare waste, fraud and abuse going on why haven't any of these simpering neanderthals bothered to push a bill that deals with that and ONLY that ? why is the administration now sitting on it's hands while this continues unabated with apparently their full knowledge and consent?moreover, one un-Socialistic move of Obama's was to propose $400 billion in medicare cuts, and it was a Republican, McCain, who led the opposition against that
Corps can make profit and not screw us , IT IS POSSIBLE.
but government unions cannot, corporate profits are way down, and they currently employ fewer people than they did 10 years ago, yet government keeps bringing in more people, and paying them with a credit card
Total strawman bullshit, no one has advocated "free markets with no 'restaints' in place".Apparently you're unable to differentiate between "sound" and "only" ... they are in fact two distinct words with totally unrelated meanings.
That being said, the condition of "Wall Street" was fine when it was largely confined to the constraints of a free, fair and open marketplace, it's only gotten out of control when it's been allowed to co-opt the services of a federal government that is no longer constrained by the U.S. Constitution. I realize that you central planning advocates find it hard to grasp that the marketplace is a much harder taskmaster on market participants than government but history strongly suggests that it is and recent events only reinforce that hypothesis.
No it is not.
History has proven what happens to free markets with no restaints in place.
You're the one that appears to be ignoring it and if I may be so bold as to point it out, you seem ignore it quite regularly and often quite selectively.You can ignore or distort history all you want ,
LOL, who exactly are "the misers" and who made any mention of Ron Paul ? Do you get this nonsense from the voices in your head or does the Democratic Party just beam it directly into your brain from DNC headquarters?just dont expect sane people to buy the misers and ron paul crap.
Total strawman bullshit, no one has advocated "free markets with no 'restaints' in place".No it is not.
History has proven what happens to free markets with no restaints in place.
You're the one that appears to be ignoring it and if I may be so bold as to point it out, you seem ignore it quite regularly and often quite selectively.
LOL, who exactly are "the misers" and who made any mention of Ron Paul ? Do you get this nonsense from the voices in your head or does the Democratic Party just beam it directly into your brain from DNC headquarters?just dont expect sane people to buy the misers and ron paul crap.
Do you really think your end the fed line is not a Misers and Ron Paul line?
Look dude you are fooling no one.
The right to legal representation against the depradations of a leviathan IS important to a lot of us, and so is healthcare.
Are you possibly unaware that healthcare, and Insurance for Profit by a corporation are entirely different things?
Are you possibly unaware that in a system where precendent setting is what "case law" is all about, when even minimal legal representation is denied to anyone, it means YOU are just that much closer to being told, when YOU are in court, that YOU have no right to have it, since there is a precedent established and the principle of stare decisis applies? Can you even imagine how long you could sit in jail "hoping," until maybe something comes along that will go against prior decisions and the body of case law that landed on your ass?
The reason for legal representation, for the ignorant, is that YOU may be as totally guilty as hell, confessed, evidence, there is video, and everything else, nevertheless, I want the precedent of YOU having that total and even superior representation to stand, with all "i's" dotted, and all "t's" crossed, so that if/when you are convicted, I am sure YOU are where YOU are supposed to be, justly, and when it is my turn, and I am mistakenly or falsely accused, the precedent will stand, I will be represented, truth will out, and I WILL GO FREE!
What I DON'T WANT is stupid fucks that refuse to think deciding to hell with the procedure just because they KNOW someone did this or that... And all too often the DON'T KNOW ANYTHING, but move right to execution anyway. THAT is LYNCHING. What you don't seem to get is that that sort of behavior also sets precedents!
Not for foreign terrorist enemy combatants .......
Difference between your beliefs and mine: apparently I am the REAL AMERICAN here, as I believe in the US Constitution, believe in what it stands for and believe that the principles we are supposed to be living by are considerably more important than the prejudices of the totally ignorant who think as you do.
I love how republicans say it’s democrats who serve wallstreet but today they say wallstreet stocks went down when trump got corona and they say the stock market and wallstreet want trump to win and continue the tax breaks and deregulationIn a Message to Democrats, Wall St. Sends Cash to G.O.P. - NYTimes.com
It seems wall street is mad at Obama.
They bailed on the Rs last time arround because even they did not like the mismanagement that sunk the economy.
They helped create it but they still didnt like the outcome much so they gave to Obama last time arround.
Now since Obama has vowed to "manage" their inability to control themselves and act responsibly to the economy they have gone right back over to the Rs.
You are again the party of Wallstreet Republicans.
WooHoo
