Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In my opinion, polls like this are meaningless. Continuing to promote the "my party isn't as crappy as your party" mindset is not what the foundation of this Republic is about.
With two weeks more or less before the election, it's not getting better than this.
That is a very weak retort. If "We The People" don't work on focusing on what is truly important, having debate about the legislative direction of this Republic, (as it pertains to the Constitution) instead of continuing to play political party football, who will?
And I don't think I need to tell you who would wail the loudest if group plans stopped covering abortions because they were not tax deductible.
That's the game.
The abortion benefit itself should be excised. Then we'd see who still offers it.
The abortion benefit itself should be excised. Then we'd see who still offers it.
Sounds like you're saying people should pay for their abortion coverage separately, independent of the government-subsidized portion of their health insurance coverage.
Yet that can't be what you're saying because that's exactly the approach the ACA takes with respect to coverage in the exchanges. And if I'm reading post #8 correctly, you've rejected that approach as inadequate.
The ACA directs that the premiums be separated. That's not inconsistent with what I'm saying.
The ACA directs that the premiums be separated. That's not inconsistent with what I'm saying.
Well, on the one hand it sounds like you're endorsing that approach. On the other hand, you said: "Taxpayer funded abortions is something Americans don't want. They had to lie about to pass their garbage health care bill."
So is it a lie to claim that this approach avoids taxpayer funding of abortions?
Abortion is really not on anyone's radar this election. This is just a deflection and an attempt to grasp at anything to create an issue. It fails.
Abortion is really not on anyone's radar this election. This is just a deflection and an attempt to grasp at anything to create an issue. It fails.
that's pretty funny... coming from the party of the tea freaks.
you like bartering chickens for medical care, hon?
think that girls should be forced to carry a baby to term if they're raped or the vicim of incest?
niiiiiiiiice.
Well that's unexpected!
POLL: Voters more likely to see Democrats as dominated by extremists - TheHill.com
POLL: Voters more likely to see Democrats as dominated by extremists
By Alexander Bolton - 10/14/10 06:00 AM ET
Likely voters in battleground districts see extremists as having a more dominant influence over the Democratic Party than they do over the GOP.
This result comes from The Hill 2010 Midterm Election Poll, which found that 44 percent of likely voters say the Democratic Party is more dominated by its extreme elements, whereas 37 percent say its the Republican Party that is more dominated by extremists.
The revelations in a survey of 10 toss-up congressional districts across the country point to problems for Democrats, who are trying to motivate a disillusioned base and appeal to independents moving to the GOP ahead of the Nov. 2 election...
that's pretty funny... coming from the party of the tea freaks.
you like bartering chickens for medical care, hon?
think that girls should be forced to carry a baby to term if they're raped or the vicim of incest?
niiiiiiiiice.
that's pretty funny... coming from the party of the tea freaks.
you like bartering chickens for medical care, hon?
think that girls should be forced to carry a baby to term if they're raped or the vicim of incest?
niiiiiiiiice.
So Martha, if Republicans Privatize Social Security and end Medicare, Medicaid and repeal the minimum wage, what are you going to do?
Martha, "Move to China, live in a dorm and work for 88 dollars an hour, or be a hooker, I haven't decided. The opportunities are endless".
Well that's unexpected!
POLL: Voters more likely to see Democrats as dominated by extremists - TheHill.com
POLL: Voters more likely to see Democrats as dominated by extremists
By Alexander Bolton - 10/14/10 06:00 AM ET
Likely voters in battleground districts see extremists as having a more dominant influence over the Democratic Party than they do over the GOP.
This result comes from The Hill 2010 Midterm Election Poll, which found that 44 percent of likely voters say the Democratic Party is more dominated by its extreme elements, whereas 37 percent say its the Republican Party that is more dominated by extremists.
The revelations in a survey of 10 toss-up congressional districts across the country point to problems for Democrats, who are trying to motivate a disillusioned base and appeal to independents moving to the GOP ahead of the Nov. 2 election...
Well that's unexpected!
POLL: Voters more likely to see Democrats as dominated by extremists - TheHill.com
POLL: Voters more likely to see Democrats as dominated by extremists
By Alexander Bolton - 10/14/10 06:00 AM ET
Likely voters in battleground districts see extremists as having a more dominant influence over the Democratic Party than they do over the GOP.
This result comes from The Hill 2010 Midterm Election Poll, which found that 44 percent of likely voters say the Democratic Party is more dominated by its extreme elements, whereas 37 percent say its the Republican Party that is more dominated by extremists.
The revelations in a survey of 10 toss-up congressional districts across the country point to problems for Democrats, who are trying to motivate a disillusioned base and appeal to independents moving to the GOP ahead of the Nov. 2 election...
that's pretty funny... coming from the party of the tea freaks.
you like bartering chickens for medical care, hon?
think that girls should be forced to carry a baby to term if they're raped or the vicim of incest?
niiiiiiiiice.
Well of course these are the people that will be voting in a couple weeks, the administration seems to think the way to win them over is labeling them hicks or terrorists. How's that working out?
that's pretty funny... coming from the party of the tea freaks.
you like bartering chickens for medical care, hon?
think that girls should be forced to carry a baby to term if they're raped or the vicim of incest?
niiiiiiiiice.
Well of course these are the people that will be voting in a couple weeks, the administration seems to think the way to win them over is labeling them hicks or terrorists. How's that working out?
Wasn't it a Republican candidate who put out a casting call for a bunch of guys who looked like hicks? Sorry, you people own that one.
Casting Call for Audience of Obamas MTV Town Hall?
October 08, 2010 9:45 AM
Miller ABC News' Sunlen Miller reports:
When President Obama sits down for his MTV town hall this Thursday, the audience of young people who will ask him questions will have been gathered by a casting call.
According to the casting call for the event from talent agency Backstage.com, first reported by National Review Online, the company requests applications for the event, asking what issues the person is passionate about, requiring a short description of your political views, and also asks for a recent photo.
MTV, BET and CMT are casting the audience for town hall meeting with President Obama. Shooting Oct. 14, 4 p.m. in Washington, D.C. SeekingAudience Members: males & females, 18+, the casting call says, To ensure that the audience represents diverse interests and political views, include your name, phone number, hometown, school attending, your job and what issues, if any, you are interested in or passionate about. Also, provide a recent photo and short description of your political views.
...
