The parallel universe where Mitt Romney leads all polls

Do you believe 11% more democratics than republicans, and only 1 percent of independents will turn out in Ohio on election day?

A simple yes or no please...

You're wasting your time.. RW lives in an alternate reality that well, rejects reality.

It's a simple question, yet all of them are afraid to answer it....

I answered you

You just can't accept what you are being told

Denial of trending results in Ohio can only get you so far
 
While polling Ohio, how does one go about "oversampling"
It's a simple concept.. When you include overwhelmingly more D's than Rs and only 1% of independents, then your data is oversampled to the D's.... If the turnout is not D+11 then 0bama does not get that result...

Why did every sample show a significant swing to the Democratic side after Romneys 35% debacle?
Logical fallacy... You cannot claim one action caused the other action...

In making a random poll, how does one know who will answer as a Democrat and who will answer as a Republican? You don't....you just report what was answered
Republicans just don't like the answer

Romneys numbers dropped in all swing states after the 47% blunder....do you have a better explanation?
 
While polling Ohio, how does one go about "oversampling"
It's a simple concept.. When you include overwhelmingly more D's than Rs and only 1% of independents, then your data is oversampled to the D's.... If the turnout is not D+11 then 0bama does not get that result...

Why did every sample show a significant swing to the Democratic side after Romneys 35% debacle?
Logical fallacy... You cannot claim one action caused the other action...

In making a random poll, how does one know who will answer as a Democrat and who will answer as a Republican? You don't....you just report what was answered
Republicans just don't like the answer

Romneys numbers dropped in all swing states after the 47% blunder....do you have a better explanation?

Leftwhiner is still pretending to believe that the rough percentages of poll responders is akin to how the voters will come to the polls.

:lol:
 
Conservative reaction to Ohio polling results

head-in-sand.jpg
 
leftwhiner's reaction to having the truth about Dim oversampling pointed out to him is a butthurt moment of caterwauling -- again.

Because of which the question must be asked of him:

your-gullibility.jpg
 
While polling Ohio, how does one go about "oversampling"
It's a simple concept.. When you include overwhelmingly more D's than Rs and only 1% of independents, then your data is oversampled to the D's.... If the turnout is not D+11 then 0bama does not get that result...

Why did every sample show a significant swing to the Democratic side after Romneys 35% debacle?
Logical fallacy... You cannot claim one action caused the other action...

In making a random poll, how does one know who will answer as a Democrat and who will answer as a Republican? You don't....you just report what was answered
Republicans just don't like the answer
An unweighted poll of whomever answers the phone is not a demographic of voter turnout on election day.. You can pretend it will be a representative sample, but we'll just laugh at you...

Romneys numbers dropped in all swing states after the 47% blunder....do you have a better explanation?
Polls out show people agree with Romney's comment more than they disagree with it... The ones who disagree were never going to vote for Romney anyway...
 
Will D turnout in Ohio be +11? Probably not quite. Maybe +8. The difference is normal margin of error stuff.

More randomly sampled voters are now identifying themselves as Democrats. That's not bias, that's just bad news for Republicans. So they're in denial about it, and they're making up these conspiracy theories to justify their denial.

Now, turnout is a very different thing than margin of winning, but Liability and Dr. House have already demonstrated their inability to grasp such simple concepts, so there's no point in trying to walk them through it. We'll just be sure to check back with them in a month, to savor their sweet tears of sorrow.
 
Will D turnout in Ohio be +11? Probably not quite. Maybe +8. The difference is normal margin of error stuff.

More randomly sampled voters are now identifying themselves as Democrats. That's not bias, that's just bad news for Republicans. So they're in denial about it, and they're making up these conspiracy theories to justify their denial.

Now, turnout is a very different thing than margin of winning, but Liability and Dr. House have already demonstrated their inability to grasp such simple concepts, so there's no point in trying to walk them through it. We'll just be sure to check back with them in a month, to savor their sweet tears of sorrow.

The D turnout in Ohio is unlikely to be much higher than (if any higher than) the Republican turnout.

The Dims are justifiably demotivated.

Indys are likely to break more for the GOP candidate than for the failed Dim candidate.

The undecided voters will come down on the side of Romney.

Ohio is going into the GOP column. Why? Because Ohioans may make some mistakes, but they ain't stupid.

:cool:
 
Will D turnout in Ohio be +11? Probably not quite. Maybe +8. The difference is normal margin of error stuff.

More randomly sampled voters are now identifying themselves as Democrats. That's not bias, that's just bad news for Republicans. So they're in denial about it, and they're making up these conspiracy theories to justify their denial.

Now, turnout is a very different thing than margin of winning, but Liability and Dr. House have already demonstrated their inability to grasp such simple concepts, so there's no point in trying to walk them through it. We'll just be sure to check back with them in a month, to savor their sweet tears of sorrow.

The D turnout in Ohio is unlikely to be much higher than (if any higher than) the Republican turnout.

The Dims are justifiably demotivated.

Indys are likely to break more for the GOP candidate than for the failed Dim candidate.

The undecided voters will come down on the side of Romney.

Ohio is going into the GOP column. Why? Because Ohioans may make some mistakes, but they ain't stupid.

:cool:

Some of us haven't forgotten you made these same kind of insane arguments to claim that Fred Thompson was going to win the 2008 Iowa caucuses.

The Foxnews poll in Ohio had Obama leading among Independents.
 

Forum List

Back
Top