the only thing Obama has to do to win the presidency

Ok wise guy explain how if Obama will withdraw all the combat brigades with in 16 months AND have no permanent bases in Iraq how he will ALSO have combat brigades in Iraq to crush any AL Queda that resurface? He has stated that IS his plan.

Because he has already said he will listen to the commanders on the ground and do what is best to achieve a safe exit.

McSame on the other hand will have us there his entire tenure in office.
 
Because he has already said he will listen to the commanders on the ground and do what is best to achieve a safe exit.

McSame on the other hand will have us there his entire tenure in office.

Look at what he said. You can not both have no combat brigades and no permanent bases in Iraq AND have combat Brigades IN Iraq at the same time. They are mutually exclusive. Further the dieing won't stop IF he is going to pull out but go back every time there is a problem, in fact I suggest the dieing will increase for us since rather then on the ground in place we will have to move to the hot spots allowing attacks every step of the way. We won't have a working knowledge of the people or the forces already there either.
 
http://www.gallup.com/poll/105529/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Edges-Ahead-Clinton.aspx

Obama has already rebounded in the polls so the race baiting aint working for you guys.

Or this one...
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_...ial_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

Nationally, Hillary Clinton now holds a very slight advantage over Barack Obama, 46% to 44%. Before the story broke about his former Pastor, Obama led Clinton by eight percentage points (see recent daily results). While the national polls remain close, Rasmussen Markets data gives Obama a -% chance to win the Democratic nomination while expectations for a Clinton victory are at -%.
 
you mean that he wouldn't mind us being in Iraq for 100 years....but you all seem to forget the second part with no casualities

It's funny how you all say a racist is taken out of context...:rofl:

Whether McCain was taken out of context or not - or even if he is correct - the American public does not want hear the troops being in Iraq for 100 years, especially when there is no end in sight to the conflict and Americans continue dying.
 
Or this one...
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_...ial_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

Nationally, Hillary Clinton now holds a very slight advantage over Barack Obama, 46% to 44%. Before the story broke about his former Pastor, Obama led Clinton by eight percentage points (see recent daily results). While the national polls remain close, Rasmussen Markets data gives Obama a -% chance to win the Democratic nomination while expectations for a Clinton victory are at -%.

Doesn't matter.

Clinton must pull off a string of upsets in states like NC and Indiana to win, which seems unlikely.
 
Whether McCain was taken out of context or not - or even if he is correct - the American public does not want hear the troops being in Iraq for 100 years, especially when there is no end in sight to the conflict and Americans continue dying.

You still seemed to miss the with no casualities part. That's not out of context that was his actual words.
 
Doesn't matter.

Clinton must pull off a string of upsets in states like NC and Indiana to win, which seems unlikely.

No she doesn't just come closer than she is now and continue to create doubt that Obama can win the general election. The superdelegates will hand her the nomination, remember, her and Bill have been at this alot longer than Obama.:badgrin:
 
You still seemed to miss the with no casualities part. That's not out of context that was his actual words.

That would be inconvenient to include, it would destroy the spin they want on it. That it COMPLETELY invalidates the complaint is beside the point.

It would be the same as complaining that we still have troops in Europe now for 63 years and no end in sight. Or Korea for 58 years. Or Japan for 63 years as well.
 
Yea...after he started taking heat for receiving it and placing it on his web cite?

Was it removed after he took heat or after he found out what was going on?

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/web...rty_on_Obama_Site_-_Approved_by_Campaign&only

When we were alerted of the existence of this page, we pulled it down. Yet even after we pulled the page, Fox News continues to disingenuously and prominently feature this “story” on their homepage.

After I tried to cut through the spin and get to the cold, hard, facts and learned of the details, I considered it to be no big deal.

http://yellowlimes.blogspot.com/sea...+Admin+Must+Approve+Groups+Before+They+Appear
 

Forum List

Back
Top