The only Gubmint Entitlement Program I'd be happy to pay taxes for.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by PredFan, Dec 4, 2011.

  1. PredFan
    Offline

    PredFan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    29,191
    Thanks Received:
    4,422
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    In Liberal minds, rent free.
    Ratings:
    +11,623
    The only entitlement program that I would agree with would be to give totally free (iow, paid for by the taxpayer) vasectomys and tubal ligations. In the log run, sterilizations would actually save the taxpayer a shit-ton of money.

    I would pay for that.
     
  2. occupied
    Offline

    occupied Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    16,407
    Thanks Received:
    2,247
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +5,731
    Eugenics, really?
     
  3. PredFan
    Offline

    PredFan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    29,191
    Thanks Received:
    4,422
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    In Liberal minds, rent free.
    Ratings:
    +11,623
    Where in there did it say anything about forcing anyone to get the surgery?
     
  4. occupied
    Offline

    occupied Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    16,407
    Thanks Received:
    2,247
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +5,731
    You didn't but that's what it would lead to, not even opposed to it in principle as long as it could never be used as a condition of qualifying for any other program. It would be a hell of a lot harder to get it past the Christians than anyone else.
     
  5. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    That's the Left: never letting facts get in the way.
    for the record, I would oppose such programs but would support programs that change the incentives to have out of wedlock children, i.e. eliminate welfare as we know it.
     
  6. PredFan
    Offline

    PredFan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    29,191
    Thanks Received:
    4,422
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    In Liberal minds, rent free.
    Ratings:
    +11,623
    That is your opinion based on well...not much.
     
  7. PredFan
    Offline

    PredFan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    29,191
    Thanks Received:
    4,422
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    In Liberal minds, rent free.
    Ratings:
    +11,623
    You would oppose vasectomies and tubal ligations? Neither one of those kill babies for even fertilized eggs. I know it's an entitlement program but it is one that will actually save the taxpayer money down the road.
     
  8. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    I believe people are an asset, not a liability.
    That said, the only reason to do something like that is to fix a problem that could more easily be fixed in other ways.
     
  9. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,136
    Thanks Received:
    10,163
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,683
    I think the American taxpayer should be on the hook for only one kid.
     
  10. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    I think they should be on the hook for no kid. Having kids is the parents' responsibility. If we subsidize having kids, we'll have more at taxpayer expense.
     

Share This Page