The Obomanation Passed the Buck. Trump Refused to Play

[The Purge]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

 

[tigerred59]

Dude, Trump can't spell Iran, find it on a map and could give two fucks about the guy he was told to kill.....if you find that a boss move...more power to ya!!

 

[Silent Warrior]

Dude, Trump can't spell Iran, find it on a map and could give two fucks about the guy he was told to kill.....if you find that a boss move...more power to ya!!

Every time you open your mouth you seem dumber than the last time. Trump's in the white house and you're in your mom's basement. Don't keep letting your mindless TDS get out in public.

 

[Augustine_]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

We are exactly where we have been with Iran for 6 or 7 decades. A step forward was taken a few years ago, and out of all the billions of people on the planet, a minority group in the U.S. that makes up the Trump movement absolutely lost their minds and killed it. They scrapped the deal and Iran resumed work on the bomb. At the same time, the Trump movement showered love and praise on North Korea and Kim Jong Un, proving to Iran that there are great rewards ahead if they get nukes.

 

[The Purge]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

We are exactly where we have been with Iran for 6 or 7 decades. A step forward was taken a few years ago, and out of all the billions of people on the planet, a minority group in the U.S. that makes up the Trump movement absolutely lost their minds and killed it. They scrapped the deal and Iran resumed work on the bomb. At the same time, the Trump movement showered love and praise on North Korea and Kim Jong Un, proving to Iran that there are great rewards ahead if they get nukes.

More lies from the left...
You idiots aren't even good at it!

 

[Silent Warrior]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

We are exactly where we have been with Iran for 6 or 7 decades. A step forward was taken a few years ago, and out of all the billions of people on the planet, a minority group in the U.S. that makes up the Trump movement absolutely lost their minds and killed it. They scrapped the deal and Iran resumed work on the bomb. At the same time, the Trump movement showered love and praise on North Korea and Kim Jong Un, proving to Iran that there are great rewards ahead if they get nukes.

Only an idiot would think that Iran wasn't working on the bomb all along. The "step forward" you are so fond of just made it easier for them.

 

[Augustine_]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

We are exactly where we have been with Iran for 6 or 7 decades. A step forward was taken a few years ago, and out of all the billions of people on the planet, a minority group in the U.S. that makes up the Trump movement absolutely lost their minds and killed it. They scrapped the deal and Iran resumed work on the bomb. At the same time, the Trump movement showered love and praise on North Korea and Kim Jong Un, proving to Iran that there are great rewards ahead if they get nukes.

Only an idiot would think that Iran wasn't working on the bomb all along. The "step forward" you are so fond of just made it easier for them.

Even your fat orange fuck was forced to declare them in accordance with the deal. Multiple times.

 

[two_iron]

No telling how much got kicked back Mullah 0bama and Big Mike. Enough to buy multi-million dollar estates, no doubt. Marxists need an idol to worship - it's an important element of the brainwashing. Barry soetoro, that simple-minded stoner fuckwit and his tranny beard of a wife must feel like they are the luckiest idols to ever walk on this planet..... and they're right.

 

[Thunk]

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

I couldn't have stated it better!!!

 

[justoffal]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

We are exactly where we have been with Iran for 6 or 7 decades. A step forward was taken a few years ago, and out of all the billions of people on the planet, a minority group in the U.S. that makes up the Trump movement absolutely lost their minds and killed it. They scrapped the deal and Iran resumed work on the bomb. At the same time, the Trump movement showered love and praise on North Korea and Kim Jong Un, proving to Iran that there are great rewards ahead if they get nukes.

There was never any deal....only a piece of paper.....a few billion in squandered cash and a room full of hysterically laughing Mullahs. Let them go back to enrichment...it will totally break their bank....do you have any idea how expensive that is? Probably not... I don't get the impression that you know very much of anything in fact. Iran is close to toppling....all it will take now is one high level Army commander to sympathize with the freedom movement and it will be effectively over.

JO

 

[Billiejeens]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

We are exactly where we have been with Iran for 6 or 7 decades. A step forward was taken a few years ago, and out of all the billions of people on the planet, a minority group in the U.S. that makes up the Trump movement absolutely lost their minds and killed it. They scrapped the deal and Iran resumed work on the bomb. At the same time, the Trump movement showered love and praise on North Korea and Kim Jong Un, proving to Iran that there are great rewards ahead if they get nukes.

Only an idiot would think that Iran wasn't working on the bomb all along. The "step forward" you are so fond of just made it easier for them.

Even your fat orange fuck was forced to declare them in accordance with the deal. Multiple times.

False.

 

[Billiejeens]

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

I couldn't have stated it better!!!

They absolutely are pro terrorist if the terrorists are against Israel or the USA.

 

[Thunk]

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

I couldn't have stated it better!!!

They absolutely are pro terrorist if the terrorists are against Israel or the USA.

Yup...that's what the quoted paragraph is saying...with a little sarcasm thrown in for good measure.

 

[Ame®icano]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

"fail to brief them"

LOL

That was actual success. It's from different raid, but you get the point.

 

[tigerred59]

Dude, Trump can't spell Iran, find it on a map and could give two fucks about the guy he was told to kill.....if you find that a boss move...more power to ya!!

Every time you open your mouth you seem dumber than the last time. Trump's in the white house and you're in your mom's basement. Don't keep letting your mindless TDS get out in public.

Trump's in the white house? and not on a golf course? Now I know the world is coming to an end!!

 

[tigerred59]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

"fail to brief them"

LOL

That was actual success. It's from different raid, but you get the point.

View attachment 300626

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Even your fat orange fuck was forced to declare them in accordance with the deal. Multiple times.

If you are in accordance with a corrupt fixed deal then where is the advantage in that? The Obama-Kerry sham guaranteed Iran would be awash in money and their nuclear WMD would be realized in a relatively brief period of time, if Iran played along.

Leftist dopes act like this agreement was a golden ticket when it really was just a way to elevate Iran's global position while everyone watched and smiled. The agreement was always bunkum! The Lawless Underpinnings of the Iran Nuclear Deal

 

[Ame®icano]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

"fail to brief them"

LOL

That was actual success. It's from different raid, but you get the point.

View attachment 300626

View attachment 300703

You probably think "you got" my point. LOL

 

[The Purge]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

"fail to brief them"

LOL

That was actual success. It's from different raid, but you get the point.

View attachment 300626

View attachment 300703

Why a picture of the Moocher obomatoid next to Trump?

 

[Augustine_]

So MUCH MORE AT LINK
Tablet ^ | January 14, 2020 | Lee Smith


In the wake of the targeted killing of Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani, an interesting fight has broken out—after Donald Trump failed to brief them in advance of the strike, Democrats began fulsomely criticizing the president. This led Republican lawmakers to accuse their counterparts across the aisle of pro-terrorist sympathies. Maybe Republicans are still sore that Barack Obama compared them to Iranian hardliners like Soleimani for denouncing his signature foreign policy initiative, the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Or maybe it’s something else.

Because the fact is that the Democrats are not pro-terrorist. They’re simply intent on protecting the historic agreement that legalized the nuclear weapons program of a terror state.

Democratic leadership is angry it wasn’t briefed before the operation, as were some Republican lawmakers critical of the scant information in the White House intelligence briefing on the attack. But there is reason to believe senior Democrats would have leaked it to the press, as they’ve done repeatedly over the last three years to prosecute their anti-Trump campaign. In particular, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff and his staff have used CNN as a platform to push the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Why would Democrats endanger U.S. national security by leaking highly classified plans of a major operation against a terror leader? Because Soleimani was the centerpiece of the nuclear deal.

The JCPOA was the instrument Obama used to secure the administration’s ultimate goal—realigning U.S. interests with those of Iran. For the U.S. to be able to minimize its footprint in the Middle East, the Obama White House needed a proxy force—much like the Iranians use proxies to advance their interests. Soleimani managed Iranian proxies and Obama, who praised the late commander, believed he was capable of stabilizing the region on behalf of America......

------------

The JCPOA was all about kickbacks from the 150 billion dollars that were unfrozen.

Of course. You have to understand John Fucking Kerry's position. He wanted to steal some money on his own (like Fredo), not just live off of Tereza Heinz's portfolio.....So obvious...ROTFLMFAO!

We are exactly where we have been with Iran for 6 or 7 decades. A step forward was taken a few years ago, and out of all the billions of people on the planet, a minority group in the U.S. that makes up the Trump movement absolutely lost their minds and killed it. They scrapped the deal and Iran resumed work on the bomb. At the same time, the Trump movement showered love and praise on North Korea and Kim Jong Un, proving to Iran that there are great rewards ahead if they get nukes.

Only an idiot would think that Iran wasn't working on the bomb all along. The "step forward" you are so fond of just made it easier for them.

Even your fat orange fuck was forced to declare them in accordance with the deal. Multiple times.

False.

No, it's true. They hid that from you in your retardo right wing media circle jerks.