The NRA plan is so stupid that 1/3rd of all public schools already use it

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Doc91678, Dec 24, 2012.

  1. Doc91678
    Offline

    Doc91678 BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2012
    Messages:
    753
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Binghamton
    Ratings:
    +99
    12/24/12
    Via New York Times:


    [. . .] Nationwide, at least 23,000 schools — about one-third of all public schools — already had armed security on staff as of the most recent data, for the 2009-10 school year, and a number of states and districts that do not use them have begun discussing the idea in recent days. . .

    Plus the NRA plan was much more comprehensive than just armed guards.


    (Excerpt)

    Read more at
    The NRA plan is so stupid that 1/3rd of all public schools already use it - The Feed - National Review Online
     
  2. OKTexas
    Offline

    OKTexas New Life Member of the NRA 12/15 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    24,079
    Thanks Received:
    3,753
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Near Magnolia, TX
    Ratings:
    +11,222
    Ya mean Wayne ain't so bat shit crazy after all? That'll piss off the libs. Ain't it great?
     
  3. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,394
    I am being nice for Christmas. :D
     
  4. OKTexas
    Offline

    OKTexas New Life Member of the NRA 12/15 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    24,079
    Thanks Received:
    3,753
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Near Magnolia, TX
    Ratings:
    +11,222
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. eflatminor
    Offline

    eflatminor Classical Liberal

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    9,246
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,053
    Where was the outrage when President Clinton championed "COPS in School," a Justice Department program that helps pay the costs of placing police officers in schools?

    Clinton stated:

    "Already, it has placed 2,200 officers in more than 1,000 communities across our nation, where they are heightening school safety"

    Clinton also signed crime legislation passed by a Republican Congress that paid local schools to hire armed security.

    For what it's worth, I disagree with both Clinton and LaPierre. The federal government should have no role in such matters. If states or local governments want to pay for armed individuals in public schools, that's their choice.
     
  6. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,471
    Thanks Received:
    5,416
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,315
    So, we place officers at school. At all the malls. At all public buildings. On all fire trucks answering a call. Just where does this end?

    Ol' Wayne is batshit crazy, as are the rest of you that continue to state the answer to the terrible toll that guns are taking on our society is more guns.
     
  7. OKTexas
    Offline

    OKTexas New Life Member of the NRA 12/15 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    24,079
    Thanks Received:
    3,753
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Near Magnolia, TX
    Ratings:
    +11,222
    Not necessarily more guns, just a more expeditious use of the ones we have. I favor arming teachers who wish to do so. Just the knowledge that a teacher may be armed would be a huge deterrent.
     
  8. eflatminor
    Offline

    eflatminor Classical Liberal

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    9,246
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,053
    Clinton wasn't?

    How many times must we correct you? Nobody is suggesting we need "more guns". There are plenty of firearms.

    What we are saying is the answer is NOT more gun control laws that only serve to put law abiding citizens at a disadvantage against the crazies and criminals that don't give a shit about your regulations. Why would you want to give the bad guys an edge? That's insane.

    You want to stiffen sentences for someone who uses a firearm in the commission of an actual crime? Fine. You want to put a cop your local school, go for it. But you will not put my family at a tactical disadvantage because you think AR15 rifles look icky.
     
  9. Contumacious
    Offline

    Contumacious Radical Freedom

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    17,072
    Thanks Received:
    1,469
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Adjuntas, PR , USA
    Ratings:
    +3,851
    Excuse moi Vern, did someone promised you a rose garden?

    The reason firearms were invented is because there are a lot of assholes out there.

    You stupid motherfuckers understand the situation but you want us disarmed. If you want to stay alive be aware of your surroundings, trust no one and carry a .357 S&W snub nose.

    .
     

Share This Page